Cultivar 1941: Jri9-6

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 15 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=15 | sources=1 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: description_snippet:3, flavor_profile:2, fruit_size:2, recommendation_context:2, anecdote_snippet:1, breeder_reference:1, growth_habit:1, productivity:1, selection_origin_reference:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links

Wiki Draft

Jri9-6 appears in the University of Saskatchewan haskap program as selection JR19-6. It was an advanced haskap selection of Lonicera caerulea. In 2010, it was evaluated against Borealis and other breeding selections. The report calls JR19-6 very promising. It had one of the largest bushes in Block 6 and was among the most productive plants there. [S1]

JR19-6 was also used as a female parent for open-pollinated seed collected in 2010. The seed came from advanced selections and was kept for possible experiments, grower distribution, or new plantings. [S1]

JR19-6 had large fruit in the trial. Table 23 lists berry dimensions of 24.8 mm long, 15.4 mm wide, and 12.2 mm deep, with a berry weight of 2.5 g. The report also says JR19-6 had the heaviest berry weight among the selections discussed on the previous narrative page. [S1]

Fruit quality was favorable. On a 1 to 5 scale, where 5 was best and a bitterness score of 5 meant no bitterness, JR19-6 scored 3 for texture, 3.5 for bloom, 4.5 for sweetness, 3 for sourness, 5 for bitterness, 4 for aroma, and 3.8 overall. Its soluble solids were 14.7 brix, with pH 3.38 and total acidity of 1.58% citric acid. The report says JR19-6 had one of the best sensory evaluations. Its sugar content was only average, but still higher than Borealis. [S1]

Winter survival was the main weakness. When pollen was collected in spring 2011, JR19-6 had winter killed very badly. The report says wet conditions may have contributed. Because few plants in the field showed winter damage in 2011, JR19-6 was not considered worth releasing as a new variety. It was used further in breeding instead. [S1]

The available source does not give direct parentage. It places JR19-6 in the University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding program and in advanced selection work involving Russian, Japanese, and Kurile germplasm. The packet does not establish its exact cross or species ancestry beyond haskap, Lonicera caerulea. [S1]

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012.

Selected source quotations

“‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.”
Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012, p61
“JR19-6 24.8 15.4 12.2 2.5”
Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012, p62
“JR19-6 3 3.5 4.5 3 5 4 3.8”
Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012, p63

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
102Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012unknown1500p47 p61 p62 p63 p64Table 25 lists JR19-6 with soluble solids of 14.7 brix, pH 3.38, and total acidity of 1.58% citric acid.; Fruit quality ratings: texture 3, bloom 3.5, sweetness 4.5, sour 3, bitterness 5, aroma 4, average 3.8.; Neighbori

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
102p64description_snippetTable 25 lists JR19-6 with soluble solids of 14.7 brix, pH 3.38, and total acidity of 1.58% citric acid.JR19-6 14.7 3.38 1.58page_block:0.90
102p63flavor_profileFruit quality ratings: texture 3, bloom 3.5, sweetness 4.5, sour 3, bitterness 5, aroma 4, average 3.8.JR19-6 3 3.5 4.5 3 5 4 3.8page_block:0.90
102p62recommendation_contextNeighboring page context identifies JR19-6 as a very promising selection in the associated lab analysis tables.JR19-6 24.8 15.4 12.2 2.5page_block:0.90
102p62description_snippetThe JR19-6 row is visually shaded in the table, marking it for emphasis.JR19-6 24.8 15.4 12.2 2.5page_block:0.90
102p62fruit_sizeTable 23 reports JR19-6 berry dimensions as 24.8 mm length, 15.4 mm width, and 12.2 mm depth, with berry weight 2.5 grams.JR19-6 24.8 15.4 12.2 2.5page_block:0.90
102p61breeder_referenceJR19-6 was used further in breeding rather than being released as a new variety.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61anecdote_snippetThe winter injury was thought to have been partly due to the wet conditions of 2012, but because few plants in that field showed winter damage in 2011, the selection was not consid‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61entry_hardiness_observationWhen pollen was collected in spring 2011, JR19-6 was found to have winter killed very badly.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61description_snippetJR19-6 was only average for sugar content but was higher than Borealis.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61flavor_profileJR19-6 had one of the best sensory evaluations.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61fruit_sizeThe tables below note that JR19-6 had the heaviest berry weight.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61productivityJR19-6 was among the most productive selections in Block 6.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61growth_habitIn Block 6, JR19-6 had one of the largest bushes.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p61recommendation_contextJR19-6 is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection.‘JR19-6’ is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection. In the ‘Block 6’ field that selection had one of the largest bushes and was among the most productive.page_block:0.90
102p47selection_origin_referenceListed as a female parent from which open-pollinated seed was gathered in 2010.JR op JR19-6page_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetTable 25 lists JR19-6 with soluble solids of 14.7 brix, pH 3.38, and total acidity of 1.58% citric acid.0.99
flavor_profileFruit quality ratings: texture 3, bloom 3.5, sweetness 4.5, sour 3, bitterness 5, aroma 4, average 3.8.0.99
recommendation_contextNeighboring page context identifies JR19-6 as a very promising selection in the associated lab analysis tables.0.77
description_snippetThe JR19-6 row is visually shaded in the table, marking it for emphasis.0.95
fruit_sizeTable 23 reports JR19-6 berry dimensions as 24.8 mm length, 15.4 mm width, and 12.2 mm depth, with berry weight 2.5 grams.0.99
breeder_referenceJR19-6 was used further in breeding rather than being released as a new variety.0.95
anecdote_snippetThe winter injury was thought to have been partly due to the wet conditions of 2012, but because few plants in that field showed winter damage in 2011, the selection was not considered worthwhile to release as a new vari0.78
entry_hardiness_observationWhen pollen was collected in spring 2011, JR19-6 was found to have winter killed very badly.0.98
description_snippetJR19-6 was only average for sugar content but was higher than Borealis.0.92
flavor_profileJR19-6 had one of the best sensory evaluations.0.94
fruit_sizeThe tables below note that JR19-6 had the heaviest berry weight.0.95
productivityJR19-6 was among the most productive selections in Block 6.0.97
growth_habitIn Block 6, JR19-6 had one of the largest bushes.0.97
recommendation_contextJR19-6 is highlighted in the tables as a very promising selection.0.99
selection_origin_referenceListed as a female parent from which open-pollinated seed was gathered in 2010.0.98

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.