Cultivar 2182: Dr Van Fleet

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 4 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=4 | sources=2 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: description_snippet:2, culinary_use:1, flavor_profile:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links

Wiki Draft

Daniels Nursery lists Dr Van Fleet as a rose cultivar in a 1950 northern planting guide, on a page of roses offered for the Northwest, Minnesota, and the Dakotas. The catalog describes it for ornamental flowers, not edible fruit, within the broader Rosa section. [S1]

The description is brief: Dr Van Fleet has enormous light pink flowers on long stems, blooms freely, and is very fragrant. [S1]

The page does not give parentage, breeder, release date, disease resistance, fruit use, or a botanical treatment. It says the roses on the page were field grown, two-year-old nursery stock, sold for northern conditions but still requiring winter protection. [S1]

Hardiness should be treated cautiously. Daniels Nursery marketed these roses for rugged Northwest conditions, including Minnesota and the Dakotas, but the page also says they require winter protection. [S1]

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from Daniels planting guide, 1950, with 1 additional supporting sources linked below.

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
106Daniels planting guide, 1950unknown200p12Flowers are described as very fragrant.; Enormous light-pink flowers borne freely on long stems.
139Planting time, 1950 / Alpha Nurseryunknown200p5Not a food use; catalog notes it is very fine for cut flowers.; Very large double pink flowers on single stems.

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
139p5culinary_useNot a food use; catalog notes it is very fine for cut flowers.DR. VAN FLEET—Very large double pink, on single stems; very fine for cut flowers.page_block:0.90
139p5description_snippetVery large double pink flowers on single stems.DR. VAN FLEET—Very large double pink, on single stems; very fine for cut flowers.page_block:0.90
106p12flavor_profileFlowers are described as very fragrant.DR. VAN FLEET—Enormous flowers of light pink freely borne on long stems. Very fragrant.page_block:0.90
106p12description_snippetEnormous light-pink flowers borne freely on long stems.DR. VAN FLEET—Enormous flowers of light pink freely borne on long stems. Very fragrant.page_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
culinary_useNot a food use; catalog notes it is very fine for cut flowers.0.82
description_snippetVery large double pink flowers on single stems.0.96
flavor_profileFlowers are described as very fragrant.0.94
description_snippetEnormous light-pink flowers borne freely on long stems.0.97

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.