Taxon ID:
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 3 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=3 | sources=1 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: flower_color:1, recommendation_context:1, source_reference_abbreviation:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Festiva Maxima is listed as a white peony in the 1950 Daniels Nursery planting guide. It appears on a hardy perennials catalog page, not in a fruit crop source. The entry is in the peony list, where peonies were offered at $1.00 each. [S1]
The source gives no origin, breeder, parentage, release date, plant habit, bloom details beyond white color, or hardiness details for Festiva Maxima. Its main value here is catalog placement and rating. Daniels gives it an American Peony Society rating of 9.3, and the page states that the numbers in the peony list are American Peony Society ratings. [S1]
Treat this as an ornamental perennial catalog citation, not evidence for an edible fruiting cultivar. It documents nursery availability and peony reputation in 1950, but it does not support Pomologica fruit, culinary, or cold hardiness claims beyond inclusion in a hardy perennials section. [S1]
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from Nursery Plants Available from South Dakota Nurseries.
Featured source descriptions
“Listed as white.”
— [2]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No explicit zone assertion rows yet. | ||||||
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106 | Daniels planting guide, 1950 | unknown | 3 | 0 | 0 | p18 | The numbers on the peony list are stated to be ratings given by the American Peony Society.; American Peony Society rating shown as 9.3.; Listed under the white peony subsection. |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106 | p18 | source_reference_abbreviation | The numbers on the peony list are stated to be ratings given by the American Peony Society. | WHITE FESTIVA MAXIMA ... (9.3) | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p18 | recommendation_context | American Peony Society rating shown as 9.3. | WHITE FESTIVA MAXIMA ... (9.3) | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p18 | flower_color | Listed under the white peony subsection. | WHITE FESTIVA MAXIMA ... (9.3) | page_block:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| source_reference_abbreviation | The numbers on the peony list are stated to be ratings given by the American Peony Society. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | American Peony Society rating shown as 9.3. | 0.94 |
| flower_color | Listed under the white peony subsection. | 0.98 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||