Taxon ID:
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 3 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=3 | sources=1 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: flower_color:1, recommendation_context:1, source_reference_abbreviation:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Daniels Nursery lists Mary Brand as a red peony in its 1950 hardy perennials catalog, priced at $1.00 each [S1]. The peony list uses American Peony Society ratings, and gives Mary Brand a rating of 8.7 [S1].
The source does not give parentage, breeder, origin, release date, plant habit, bloom form, season, fragrance, or hardiness details for Mary Brand [S1]. It supports only that Mary Brand was listed as a red peony in the catalog and had an American Peony Society rating [S1].
This record appears on a mixed ornamental catalog page with phlox, peonies, and gladioli, not in a fruit crop section [S1]. The available source does not identify Mary Brand as an edible fruiting perennial cultivar.
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from Nursery Plants Available from South Dakota Nurseries.
Featured source descriptions
“Listed as red.”
— [2]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No explicit zone assertion rows yet. | ||||||
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106 | Daniels planting guide, 1950 | unknown | 3 | 0 | 0 | p18 | The numbers on the peony list are stated to be ratings given by the American Peony Society.; American Peony Society rating shown as 8.7.; Listed under the red peony subsection. |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106 | p18 | source_reference_abbreviation | The numbers on the peony list are stated to be ratings given by the American Peony Society. | RED MARY BRAND ... (8.7) | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p18 | recommendation_context | American Peony Society rating shown as 8.7. | RED MARY BRAND ... (8.7) | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p18 | flower_color | Listed under the red peony subsection. | RED MARY BRAND ... (8.7) | page_block:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| source_reference_abbreviation | The numbers on the peony list are stated to be ratings given by the American Peony Society. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | American Peony Society rating shown as 8.7. | 0.96 |
| flower_color | Listed under the red peony subsection. | 0.99 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||