Cultivar 310: Romeo

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 10 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=10 | sources=4 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: flavor_profile:3, recommendation_context:2, productivity:1, selection_origin_reference:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links

Wiki Draft

Romeo is described in prairie sources as a dwarf sour cherry and is listed among the recommended varieties for northern Manitoba. Manitoba guidance places it in the University of Saskatchewan dwarf sour cherry group and recommends it for trial in very cold prairie conditions. It also notes that this group had shown good winter hardiness across the Prairies. [S4]

The strongest cultivar specific notes here come from University of Saskatchewan comparison observations, not from a full standalone profile. In those comparisons, Romeo is described as a milder fresh eating cherry than some related selections, and some evaluators considered it the best in flavor. [S3] The same comparison notes also suggest that Romeo was not among the hardiest selections at that site. Carmine Jewel was observed to be hardier, and Romeo showed about 15 percent dieback per tree in the winter of 2008 to 2009. [S2] [S3]

For season and handling, the Manitoba guide does not give a Romeo only fruit description. Its dwarf sour cherry section says these cherries flower in May or June, ripen in mid August or early September, and keep only a couple of days in the refrigerator. It recommends harvesting when the fruit is bright to dark red and slightly soft, then refrigerating, freezing, canning, or eating after pitting. Romeo is included in that recommended variety list, so these notes give useful growing context even though they apply to the crop group rather than to Romeo alone. [S4]

One source in the packet describes a different fruit also named Romeo: a 1911 Ottawa apple crab, a seedling of Salome, hardy at Morden and valued for winter display. That record does not match the University of Saskatchewan cherry material and should be treated as a same name cultivar conflict, not as evidence about Romeo cherry. [S1]

The main uncertainty is that this packet does not include a full Romeo release note or a dedicated cultivar sheet. It supports Romeo as a University of Saskatchewan associated dwarf sour cherry with favorable flavor remarks and some winter injury in 2008 to 2009, but it does not establish details such as direct parentage, exact release history, or a fuller fruit description. [S2] [S3] [S4]

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from TreeFruitsGrownInPrairieOrchards WRLeslie 1946 HQ, with 3 additional supporting sources linked below.

Featured source descriptions

“No additional individual cultivar-specific trait, pedigree, or yield descriptors are provided on this page.”
[4]
“Tree hardy at Morden.”
[5]
“Skin thick and tough; flesh deep yellow, firm, crisp, briskly sub-acid, slightly astringent.”
[5]
“Listed as a recommended variety of Dwarf Sour Cherry.”
[4]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
143Recommended fruit Varietiesunknown500p3During a -50C winter, Romeo was already in production while the other varieties were not producing.; Described as starting production at a younger age than the others.; Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and Bob agr
108Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009unknown300p1 p2Two master gardeners suggested Romeo was the mildest of the cherries for fresh eating.; Some evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor.; Romeo had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009.
107Carmine Jewel Notes: Based on observations from 2004 to 2009unknown100p1Romeo was less hardy than Carmine Jewel at this location.
111Fruit Crops for Northern Manitobaunknown100p14Listed as a recommended dwarf sour cherry variety for northern Manitoba.

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
143p3entry_hardiness_observationDuring a -50C winter, Romeo was already in production while the other varieties were not producing.Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others.page_block:0.90
143p3productivityDescribed as starting production at a younger age than the others.Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others.page_block:0.90
143p3flavor_profileMany believe Romeo is the best tasting, and Bob agrees.Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others.page_block:0.90
143p3recommendation_contextPlaced under 'Worth trying for commercial production especially in areas warmer than Saskatoon'.Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others.page_block:0.90
143p3selection_origin_referenceFormerly selection 7-7-5.8.Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others.page_block:0.90
111p14recommendation_contextListed as a recommended dwarf sour cherry variety for northern Manitoba.Dwarf Sour Cherry Recommended Varieties: · Romeopage_block:0.90
108p2flavor_profileTwo master gardeners suggested Romeo was the mildest of the cherries for fresh eating.Still others feel ‘Romeo’ is the best.page_block:0.90
108p2flavor_profileSome evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor.Still others feel ‘Romeo’ is the best.page_block:0.90
108p1entry_hardiness_observationRomeo had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009.injury to Crimson Passion and Romeo were around 15% dieback/ per tree.page_block:0.90
107p1entry_hardiness_observationRomeo was less hardy than Carmine Jewel at this location.CJ was hardier than Romeo and Crimson Passionpage_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
entry_hardiness_observationDuring a -50C winter, Romeo was already in production while the other varieties were not producing.0.95
productivityDescribed as starting production at a younger age than the others.0.96
flavor_profileMany believe Romeo is the best tasting, and Bob agrees.0.97
recommendation_contextPlaced under 'Worth trying for commercial production especially in areas warmer than Saskatoon'.0.99
selection_origin_referenceFormerly selection 7-7-5.8.0.99
recommendation_contextListed as a recommended dwarf sour cherry variety for northern Manitoba.0.98
flavor_profileTwo master gardeners suggested Romeo was the mildest of the cherries for fresh eating.0.92
flavor_profileSome evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor.0.86
entry_hardiness_observationRomeo had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009.0.97
entry_hardiness_observationRomeo was less hardy than Carmine Jewel at this location.0.94

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.