Taxon ID:
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 10 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=10 | sources=4 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: flavor_profile:3, recommendation_context:2, productivity:1, selection_origin_reference:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Romeo is described in prairie sources as a dwarf sour cherry and is listed among the recommended varieties for northern Manitoba. Manitoba guidance places it in the University of Saskatchewan dwarf sour cherry group and recommends it for trial in very cold prairie conditions. It also notes that this group had shown good winter hardiness across the Prairies. [S4]
The strongest cultivar specific notes here come from University of Saskatchewan comparison observations, not from a full standalone profile. In those comparisons, Romeo is described as a milder fresh eating cherry than some related selections, and some evaluators considered it the best in flavor. [S3] The same comparison notes also suggest that Romeo was not among the hardiest selections at that site. Carmine Jewel was observed to be hardier, and Romeo showed about 15 percent dieback per tree in the winter of 2008 to 2009. [S2] [S3]
For season and handling, the Manitoba guide does not give a Romeo only fruit description. Its dwarf sour cherry section says these cherries flower in May or June, ripen in mid August or early September, and keep only a couple of days in the refrigerator. It recommends harvesting when the fruit is bright to dark red and slightly soft, then refrigerating, freezing, canning, or eating after pitting. Romeo is included in that recommended variety list, so these notes give useful growing context even though they apply to the crop group rather than to Romeo alone. [S4]
One source in the packet describes a different fruit also named Romeo: a 1911 Ottawa apple crab, a seedling of Salome, hardy at Morden and valued for winter display. That record does not match the University of Saskatchewan cherry material and should be treated as a same name cultivar conflict, not as evidence about Romeo cherry. [S1]
The main uncertainty is that this packet does not include a full Romeo release note or a dedicated cultivar sheet. It supports Romeo as a University of Saskatchewan associated dwarf sour cherry with favorable flavor remarks and some winter injury in 2008 to 2009, but it does not establish details such as direct parentage, exact release history, or a fuller fruit description. [S2] [S3] [S4]
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from TreeFruitsGrownInPrairieOrchards WRLeslie 1946 HQ, with 3 additional supporting sources linked below.
Featured source descriptions
“No additional individual cultivar-specific trait, pedigree, or yield descriptors are provided on this page.”
— [4]
“Tree hardy at Morden.”
— [5]
“Skin thick and tough; flesh deep yellow, firm, crisp, briskly sub-acid, slightly astringent.”
— [5]
“Listed as a recommended variety of Dwarf Sour Cherry.”
— [4]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No explicit zone assertion rows yet. | ||||||
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143 | Recommended fruit Varieties | unknown | 5 | 0 | 0 | p3 | During a -50C winter, Romeo was already in production while the other varieties were not producing.; Described as starting production at a younger age than the others.; Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and Bob agr |
| 108 | Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009 | unknown | 3 | 0 | 0 | p1 p2 | Two master gardeners suggested Romeo was the mildest of the cherries for fresh eating.; Some evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor.; Romeo had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009. |
| 107 | Carmine Jewel Notes: Based on observations from 2004 to 2009 | unknown | 1 | 0 | 0 | p1 | Romeo was less hardy than Carmine Jewel at this location. |
| 111 | Fruit Crops for Northern Manitoba | unknown | 1 | 0 | 0 | p14 | Listed as a recommended dwarf sour cherry variety for northern Manitoba. |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143 | p3 | entry_hardiness_observation | During a -50C winter, Romeo was already in production while the other varieties were not producing. | Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others. | page_block:0.90 |
| 143 | p3 | productivity | Described as starting production at a younger age than the others. | Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others. | page_block:0.90 |
| 143 | p3 | flavor_profile | Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and Bob agrees. | Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others. | page_block:0.90 |
| 143 | p3 | recommendation_context | Placed under 'Worth trying for commercial production especially in areas warmer than Saskatoon'. | Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others. | page_block:0.90 |
| 143 | p3 | selection_origin_reference | Formerly selection 7-7-5.8. | Romeo (formerly 7-7-5.8) Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and I (Bob) agree. It start producing at a younger age than the others. | page_block:0.90 |
| 111 | p14 | recommendation_context | Listed as a recommended dwarf sour cherry variety for northern Manitoba. | Dwarf Sour Cherry Recommended Varieties: · Romeo | page_block:0.90 |
| 108 | p2 | flavor_profile | Two master gardeners suggested Romeo was the mildest of the cherries for fresh eating. | Still others feel ‘Romeo’ is the best. | page_block:0.90 |
| 108 | p2 | flavor_profile | Some evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor. | Still others feel ‘Romeo’ is the best. | page_block:0.90 |
| 108 | p1 | entry_hardiness_observation | Romeo had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009. | injury to Crimson Passion and Romeo were around 15% dieback/ per tree. | page_block:0.90 |
| 107 | p1 | entry_hardiness_observation | Romeo was less hardy than Carmine Jewel at this location. | CJ was hardier than Romeo and Crimson Passion | page_block:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| entry_hardiness_observation | During a -50C winter, Romeo was already in production while the other varieties were not producing. | 0.95 |
| productivity | Described as starting production at a younger age than the others. | 0.96 |
| flavor_profile | Many believe Romeo is the best tasting, and Bob agrees. | 0.97 |
| recommendation_context | Placed under 'Worth trying for commercial production especially in areas warmer than Saskatoon'. | 0.99 |
| selection_origin_reference | Formerly selection 7-7-5.8. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | Listed as a recommended dwarf sour cherry variety for northern Manitoba. | 0.98 |
| flavor_profile | Two master gardeners suggested Romeo was the mildest of the cherries for fresh eating. | 0.92 |
| flavor_profile | Some evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor. | 0.86 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | Romeo had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009. | 0.97 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | Romeo was less hardy than Carmine Jewel at this location. | 0.94 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||