Taxon ID: 3
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 33 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=33 | sources=4 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: recommendation_context:8, description_snippet:6, flavor_profile:2, fruit_color:2, keeping_quality:2, productivity:2, taxon_context:2, breeder_reference:1, column_scope_context:1, selection_origin_reference:1, source_reference_abbreviation:1, storage_duration:1, table_axis_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search | taxon profile | taxonomy tree
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Ember is a cold climate plum hybrid from the University of Minnesota. It was bred from Shiro x South Dakota No. 33 and named in 1936. Prairie sources also note that it was formerly released as Minn. 83. [S2] [S3] Prairie orchard literature treats it as a plum or plum hybrid noted for hardiness, productivity, and good fruit quality, not as a minor trial seedling. [S2] [S3]
Sources place its origin with the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm or University of Minnesota breeding work. [S2] [S3] South Dakota extension later listed Ember among Minnesota hybrid plums for trial in the warmest South Dakota fruit zone, along the southern border and in the lower Black Hills valleys. This helps place its recommended range but is not itself a hardiness rating. [S1]
The fruit is described as large, about 1 1/4 inches in diameter, and round to round conic or ovate roundish. The skin is yellow and heavily washed or mostly covered with bright red blush, with a noticeable bloom. [S2] [S3] The flesh is deep or rich yellow, very firm, meaty, juicy, and sweet, with a pleasant flavor and very good quality. [S2] [S3] The stone is cling. [S2]
Ember ripens late enough to stand out among hardy plums. One source says early September, while a prairie orchard source reports mid September at Morden, Manitoba. [S2] [S3] The fruit is also said to hang after ripening and keep for two weeks or more after harvest, which suggests better holding ability than many plums of its class. [S2]
The tree is described as low and spreading or simply spreading, vigorous, hardy, and productive. [S2] [S3] Bloom is reported in early May. [S2] Its hardiness, spreading habit, and productive bearing help explain why it appeared in prairie orchard reference literature rather than remaining only a Minnesota breeding record. [S2] [S3]
In broader context, Ember belongs with the hardy Prunus material developed and tested for northern conditions in Minnesota and the prairie region. [S1] [S2] [S3] Its parentage links the named Japanese plum Shiro with South Dakota breeding material, showing the kind of cross regional northern breeding that shaped many prairie suitable plums. [S2] [S3]
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from 9c684c14 7509 4b78 a803 0bf01a64aa28, with 5 additional supporting sources linked below.
Featured source descriptions
“Origin: University of Minnesota, named in 1936.”
— [6]
“Form: round, conic; apex slightly pointed; cavity small and shallow; suture a line; stem 1/4 inch long and slender.”
— [6]
“Blooms early May and ripens early September.”
— [6]
“Stone: long, oval, cling.”
— [6]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 |
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105 | Hardy fruits for Northern planting, trees, shrubs, 1937 | unknown | 12 | 0 | 0 | p8 p21 | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.; Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937.; Listed under the Plum Trees section.; Presented with earlier |
| 112 | Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits | unknown | 12 | 0 | 0 | p4 p6 p7 p9 | Placed between pollinizer rows and varieties that provide supplementary pollination.; Described as a high-quality but sometimes shy-bearing variety.; Listed as the plum cultivar in row 7 of the recommended orchard arrang |
| 106 | Daniels planting guide, 1950 | unknown | 5 | 0 | 0 | p23 | Described as a heavy bearer and one of the best.; Fruit is described as high quality.; Skin is yellowish with an attractive red blush.; Described as the longest keeper of all listed plums on the page. |
| 2 | South Dakota Fruit Garden (visual sample pages 9-11) | public_domain | 4 | 0 | 0 | p1 | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills; PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids; For Trial; {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_na |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105 | p21 | description_snippet | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | Plum Trees EMBER | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | recommendation_context | Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937. | Plum Trees EMBER | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | taxon_context | Listed under the Plum Trees section. | Plum Trees EMBER | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | recommendation_context | Presented with earlier varieties as making a splendid assortment for home or market. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | storage_duration | After picking will keep in good condition for two or three weeks. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | keeping_quality | Hangs to the tree tenaciously even at full maturity. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | fruit_color | Yellow with attractive red blush. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | flavor_profile | Has exceptionally fine dessert and canning qualities. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | description_snippet | Alate plum of good size. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | breeder_reference | Professor W. H. Alderman, Chief, Division of Horticulture, is quoted in support of the description. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | selection_origin_reference | Originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | source_reference_abbreviation | Also identified as Minnesota No. 83. | Ember (Minnesota No. 83), the new Plum originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm about which there have been so many fine reports. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p9 | recommendation_context | Placed between pollinizer rows and varieties that provide supplementary pollination. | 7 Ember ... Underwood and Ember, are placed between the pollinizer rows | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p9 | productivity | Described as a high-quality but sometimes shy-bearing variety. | 7 Ember ... Underwood and Ember, are placed between the pollinizer rows | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p9 | recommendation_context | Listed as the plum cultivar in row 7 of the recommended orchard arrangement. | 7 Ember ... Underwood and Ember, are placed between the pollinizer rows | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p7 | recommendation_context | Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums. | Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Ember plum | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | description_snippet | Table 9 gives the season of bloom as mid-season. | Ember Mid-season | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | entry_hardiness_observation | The text suggests Ember may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota. | Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | recommendation_context | Table 9 lists Ember as a recommended variety with Toka, South Dakota, and Superior rated good, Redglow poor, and Ember not used against itself. | Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | recommendation_context | Included among orchard pollinizers despite only fair compatibility from the standpoint of the discussion text. | Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | entry_pedigree | Species/background listed as P. salicina hybrid x P. americana. | Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | description_snippet | Bloom season: medium. | Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | description_snippet | Pollinated 24 varieties tested. | Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | recommendation_context | Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4. | Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | productivity | Described as a heavy bearer and one of the best. | EMBER—Mid-season, to late. The longest keeper of them all. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | flavor_profile | Fruit is described as high quality. | EMBER—Mid-season, to late. The longest keeper of them all. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | fruit_color | Skin is yellowish with an attractive red blush. | EMBER—Mid-season, to late. The longest keeper of them all. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | keeping_quality | Described as the longest keeper of all listed plums on the page. | EMBER—Mid-season, to late. The longest keeper of them all. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | description_snippet | Mid-season to late plum. | EMBER—Mid-season, to late. The longest keeper of them all. | page_block:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Ember | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Ember | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Ember | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Ember", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_tab | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Ember | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | 0.86 |
| recommendation_context | Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937. | 0.98 |
| taxon_context | Listed under the Plum Trees section. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | Presented with earlier varieties as making a splendid assortment for home or market. | 0.90 |
| storage_duration | After picking will keep in good condition for two or three weeks. | 0.97 |
| keeping_quality | Hangs to the tree tenaciously even at full maturity. | 0.95 |
| fruit_color | Yellow with attractive red blush. | 0.96 |
| flavor_profile | Has exceptionally fine dessert and canning qualities. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | A late plum of good size. | 0.95 |
| breeder_reference | Professor W. H. Alderman, Chief, Division of Horticulture, is quoted in support of the description. | 0.94 |
| selection_origin_reference | Originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | 0.97 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Also identified as Minnesota No. 83. | 0.98 |
| recommendation_context | Placed between pollinizer rows and varieties that provide supplementary pollination. | 0.96 |
| productivity | Described as a high-quality but sometimes shy-bearing variety. | 0.96 |
| recommendation_context | Listed as the plum cultivar in row 7 of the recommended orchard arrangement. | 0.97 |
| recommendation_context | Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums. | 0.90 |
| description_snippet | Table 9 gives the season of bloom as mid-season. | 0.83 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | The text suggests Ember may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota. | 0.89 |
| recommendation_context | Table 9 lists Ember as a recommended variety with Toka, South Dakota, and Superior rated good, Redglow poor, and Ember not used against itself. | 0.86 |
| recommendation_context | Included among orchard pollinizers despite only fair compatibility from the standpoint of the discussion text. | 0.92 |
| entry_pedigree | Species/background listed as P. salicina hybrid x P. americana. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Bloom season: medium. | 0.96 |
| description_snippet | Pollinated 24 varieties tested. | 0.96 |
| recommendation_context | Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4. | 0.99 |
| productivity | Described as a heavy bearer and one of the best. | 0.93 |
| flavor_profile | Fruit is described as high quality. | 0.90 |
| fruit_color | Skin is yellowish with an attractive red blush. | 0.96 |
| keeping_quality | Described as the longest keeper of all listed plums on the page. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Mid-season to late plum. | 0.97 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | 0.92 |
| taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.92 |
| table_axis_context | For Trial | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Ember", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, "row_labe | 0.94 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||