Taxon ID: 3
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 64 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: supported | claims=64 | sources=6 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: description_snippet:15, recommendation_context:11, storage_duration:5, source_reference_abbreviation:4, flavor_profile:3, fruit_color:3, fruit_size:3, taxon_context:3, column_scope_context:2, productivity:2, selection_origin_reference:2, caption_context:1, release_year_reference:1, table_axis_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search | taxon profile | taxonomy tree
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Superior is a plum from the University of Minnesota. It was bred from Burbank x Kaga and distributed as a northern hybrid plum, not a European prune type [S3]. Sources place its introduction in 1932 or 1933. One prairie source says it was formerly known as Minn. 194 [S3] [S5]. It was listed for trial in South Dakota home fruit plantings and was widely sold by South Dakota nurseries. This shows it was broadly present in the northern nursery trade even where hardiness was not fully settled [S1] [S2].
The Minnesota bulletin describes the fruit in detail. It says the fruit is about 1 3/4 inches in both dimensions, cordate in form, with a pointed apex, red skin, medium bloom, and yellow flesh that is juicy and smooth [S3]. The same source rates the flavor very good and slightly tart near the skin. It also says bloom is in early May and ripening is in late August [S3]. A prairie orchard source describes the fruit as very large, conic, dark red with heavy bloom, and with yellow flesh that is tender, juicy, sprightly, and sweetish. It places the season later, from mid September to late September [S5]. These descriptions agree on a large, high quality red plum with yellow flesh, but they do not fully agree on season [S3] [S5].
Reports on the tree also give Superior a strong horticultural profile. The Minnesota bulletin calls it very vigorous, upright, and spreading, with good foliage, good fruit adherence, and heavy productivity, enough that thinning is often needed. It also notes slight susceptibility to leaf spot [S3]. This suggests a hardy breeding plum selected as much for tree performance and crop load as for dessert quality [S3].
Its cold climate record is mixed. South Dakota Extension listed it for trial in the milder and intermediate fruit growing parts of the state, not as a universally dependable plum [S1]. A Manitoba prairie source is more direct. It calls the tree tender at Morden and fruitful only after mild winters [S5]. The safest reading is that Superior was grown and tested in northern regions, but its winter performance was less dependable than that of the toughest prairie plums [S1] [S5].
In the broader archive, Superior belongs to the University of Minnesota plum breeding stream and has a clear historical pedigree through Burbank x Kaga [S3] [S5]. Later University of Minnesota research continued to use it as germplasm in fertility studies, where its seed germination and pollen storage behavior were measured alongside other winter hardy plums [S4]. Those studies are not evidence of parentage, but they do show that Superior remained part of the working northern Prunus collection decades after release [S4].
One notable modern research detail is that Superior's pollen stainability declined significantly after only three months in freezer storage. By the end of the experiment, it was one of the few plum cultivars in that study to fall below the general more-than-50-percent pattern [S4]. This does not change the cultivar's historical identity, but it adds an unusual reproductive note for breeders considering stored pollen use [S4].
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from 9c684c14 7509 4b78 a803 0bf01a64aa28, with 8 additional supporting sources linked below.
Featured source descriptions
“Form cordate; apex pointed with russeted point; cavity moderately wide and deep; suture continuous, a line; stem 1 inch long, thick.”
— [9]
“Flesh is yellow, juicy, and has smooth texture.”
— [9]
“Has good foliage and good fruit adherence.”
— [9]
“Blooms early May and ripens late August.”
— [9]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 | ||
| ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 |
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Minnesota #1695 | unknown | 20 | 0 | 0 | p46 p73 p80 p101 p107 p108 p109 p111 | For 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66% (CD), 6 months 56% (H), 7 months 53% (G), 8 months 56% (H), 9 months 49% (J).; |
| 105 | Hardy fruits for Northern planting, trees, shrubs, 1937 | unknown | 15 | 0 | 0 | p3 p8 p21 | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.; Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937.; Listed under the Plum Trees section.; Supply noted as limited |
| 112 | Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits | unknown | 11 | 0 | 0 | p3 p4 p6 p7 p9 | Listed as the plum cultivar in row 4 of the recommended orchard arrangement.; Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.; The page suggests Superior may not be fully winter hardy in no |
| 2 | South Dakota Fruit Garden (visual sample pages 9-11) | public_domain | 6 | 0 | 0 | p1 | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie; {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "not |
| 106 | Daniels planting guide, 1950 | unknown | 6 | 0 | 0 | p23 | Said to have proven itself worthy of its name and to be one of the finest of all the plums.; Productivity is specifically praised.; Fruit is described as having good red color.; Flavor, good red color, texture, size, and |
| 139 | Planting time, 1950 / Alpha Nursery | unknown | 6 | 0 | 0 | p7 | Fruit ripens over a long period.; Described as a heavy yielder.; Described as very large.; Described as juicy and sweet. |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 139 | p7 | description_snippet | Fruit ripens over a long period. | SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder. | page_block:0.90 |
| 139 | p7 | productivity | Described as a heavy yielder. | SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder. | page_block:0.90 |
| 139 | p7 | fruit_size | Described as very large. | SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder. | page_block:0.90 |
| 139 | p7 | flavor_profile | Described as juicy and sweet. | SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder. | page_block:0.90 |
| 139 | p7 | fruit_color | Red skin and yellow flesh. | SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder. | page_block:0.90 |
| 139 | p7 | selection_origin_reference | Described as a plum from Minnesota. | SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | description_snippet | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | Plum Trees SUPERIOR | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | recommendation_context | Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937. | Plum Trees SUPERIOR | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | taxon_context | Listed under the Plum Trees section. | Plum Trees SUPERIOR | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | recommendation_context | Supply noted as limited; readers are told to order early. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | description_snippet | Can be peeled like a peach. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | flavor_profile | Delicious quality. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | description_snippet | Firm flesh. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | fruit_color | Beautiful red color. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | fruit_size | Fruit very large. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | description_snippet | Described as a sensational new plum and considered the most perfect plum among fine plums introduced by the station. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | selection_origin_reference | Originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p3 | recommendation_context | Included in the 12-tree Model Home Orchard assortment with 1 tree. | SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4 | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p3 | caption_context | Shown as a red plum illustration on this page. | SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4 | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p3 | source_reference_abbreviation | Cross-referenced to page 4 for fuller description. | SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4 | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p3 | recommendation_context | Offered at 3-4 ft. size for 55 cents each. | SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p123 | storage_duration | For 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66% (CD), 6 months 56% (H), 7 months 53% ( | 'Superior' 86% B-F 78% C 78% BC 72% H 62% G 66% CD 56% H 53% G 56% H 49% J | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | entry_location | Collection week is shown as Week 17. | 'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | source_reference_abbreviation | Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997. | 'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | release_year_reference | Introduction year listed as 1933. | 'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p112 | source_reference_abbreviation | Primary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability. | Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at le | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p112 | entry_hardiness_observation | Superior appears to have lower retained pollen stainability relative to the majority group after nine months of storage. | Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at le | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p112 | description_snippet | Superior is a plum cultivar named in the same pollen stainability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not stay above 50 percent stainability at experiment end. | Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at le | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p111 | description_snippet | Compared with other tested plum entries, Superior declines earlier under storage in this study. | In contrast, Superior had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p111 | storage_duration | Superior showed significant pollen stainability decline after only three months in storage. | In contrast, Superior had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p109 | storage_duration | Significant decrease in pollen stainability after only three months in storage. | 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p108 | storage_duration | Superior had significant decreases in pollen stainability after only three months of storage. | Average % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage whereas 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p107 | description_snippet | Superior was significantly different than Mount Royal for pollen stainability in Table 2. | with Superior’ and La Crescent’ was also significantly different than ‘Mount Royal’ (Table 2). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p101 | description_snippet | Superior is the named cultivar with earlier significant pollen viability reduction relative to the seven-month decline timing of other named plums. | Average % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p101 | storage_duration | Pollen stainability for Superior declined significantly after as few as three months of storage at -20°C. | Average % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | source_reference_abbreviation | Asterisked values appear in-table and likely indicate statistical significance in this dataset. | Plum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | description_snippet | Row records 8.3 and 75.0 with asterisked significance, plus 8.3 and values 0.3, 3.0 with asterisks. | Plum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | taxon_context | Plum row in Table 3 continuation. | Plum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p73 | description_snippet | The row is captured as 'Superior HRC x - -'. | Superior HRC x - - | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p73 | entry_location | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | Superior HRC x - - | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p46 | description_snippet | Superior appears in the explicit plum trio with significant differences between scarified and non-scarified treatments (p<0.05). | Within the plums Hennepin, Superior, and Winona there were significant differences for % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed (p<0.05; Table 3). | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p9 | recommendation_context | Listed as the plum cultivar in row 4 of the recommended orchard arrangement. | 4 Superior | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p7 | recommendation_context | Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums. | Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Superior plum | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | entry_hardiness_observation | The page suggests Superior may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota. | Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | recommendation_context | Table 9 lists Superior among suggested plum varieties for planting. | Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p6 | recommendation_context | Included among pollinizers likely to be grown in home and commercial plantings even though compatibility is only fair in the discussion text. | Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility. | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | entry_pedigree | Species/background listed as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. simonii). | Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii) | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | description_snippet | Bloom season: medium early. | Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii) | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | description_snippet | Pollinated 18 varieties tested. | Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii) | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | recommendation_context | Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4. | Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii) | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p3 | recommendation_context | Among the hybrids mentioned in Table 2, only Superior proved to have any value as a pollinizer. | Superior — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii) | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p3 | entry_pedigree | Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii). | Superior — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii) | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | recommendation_context | Said to have proven itself worthy of its name and to be one of the finest of all the plums. | SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | productivity | Productivity is specifically praised. | SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | fruit_color | Fruit is described as having good red color. | SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | flavor_profile | Flavor, good red color, texture, size, and productivity are all praised. | SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | fruit_size | Described as the largest of the Minnesota varieties. | SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties. | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | description_snippet | Mid-season plum. | SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties. | page_block:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "v | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_ | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superior | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | Fruit ripens over a long period. | 0.93 |
| productivity | Described as a heavy yielder. | 0.95 |
| fruit_size | Described as very large. | 0.94 |
| flavor_profile | Described as juicy and sweet. | 0.95 |
| fruit_color | Red skin and yellow flesh. | 0.95 |
| selection_origin_reference | Described as a plum from Minnesota. | 0.94 |
| description_snippet | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | 0.86 |
| recommendation_context | Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937. | 0.98 |
| taxon_context | Listed under the Plum Trees section. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | Supply noted as limited; readers are told to order early. | 0.88 |
| description_snippet | Can be peeled like a peach. | 0.91 |
| flavor_profile | Delicious quality. | 0.93 |
| description_snippet | Firm flesh. | 0.93 |
| fruit_color | Beautiful red color. | 0.94 |
| fruit_size | Fruit very large. | 0.96 |
| description_snippet | Described as a sensational new plum and considered the most perfect plum among fine plums introduced by the station. | 0.95 |
| selection_origin_reference | Originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | 0.98 |
| recommendation_context | Included in the 12-tree Model Home Orchard assortment with 1 tree. | 0.94 |
| caption_context | Shown as a red plum illustration on this page. | 0.98 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Cross-referenced to page 4 for fuller description. | 0.97 |
| recommendation_context | Offered at 3-4 ft. size for 55 cents each. | 0.99 |
| storage_duration | For 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66% (CD), 6 months 56% (H), 7 months 53% (G), 8 months 56% (H), 9 months 49% (J). | 0.95 |
| entry_location | Collection week is shown as Week 17. | 0.95 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997. | 0.96 |
| release_year_reference | Introduction year listed as 1933. | 0.97 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Primary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability. | 0.86 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | Superior appears to have lower retained pollen stainability relative to the majority group after nine months of storage. | 0.89 |
| description_snippet | Superior is a plum cultivar named in the same pollen stainability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not stay above 50 percent stainability at experiment end. | 0.93 |
| description_snippet | Compared with other tested plum entries, Superior declines earlier under storage in this study. | 0.92 |
| storage_duration | Superior showed significant pollen stainability decline after only three months in storage. | 0.99 |
| storage_duration | Significant decrease in pollen stainability after only three months in storage. | 0.90 |
| storage_duration | Superior had significant decreases in pollen stainability after only three months of storage. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Superior was significantly different than Mount Royal for pollen stainability in Table 2. | 0.84 |
| description_snippet | Superior is the named cultivar with earlier significant pollen viability reduction relative to the seven-month decline timing of other named plums. | 0.95 |
| storage_duration | Pollen stainability for Superior declined significantly after as few as three months of storage at -20°C. | 0.97 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Asterisked values appear in-table and likely indicate statistical significance in this dataset. | 0.84 |
| description_snippet | Row records 8.3 and 75.0 with asterisked significance, plus 8.3 and values 0.3, 3.0 with asterisks. | 0.90 |
| taxon_context | Plum row in Table 3 continuation. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | The row is captured as 'Superior HRC x - -'. | 0.95 |
| entry_location | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Superior appears in the explicit plum trio with significant differences between scarified and non-scarified treatments (p<0.05). | 0.97 |
| recommendation_context | Listed as the plum cultivar in row 4 of the recommended orchard arrangement. | 0.96 |
| recommendation_context | Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums. | 0.90 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | The page suggests Superior may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota. | 0.90 |
| recommendation_context | Table 9 lists Superior among suggested plum varieties for planting. | 0.96 |
| recommendation_context | Included among pollinizers likely to be grown in home and commercial plantings even though compatibility is only fair in the discussion text. | 0.93 |
| entry_pedigree | Species/background listed as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. simonii). | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Bloom season: medium early. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Pollinated 18 varieties tested. | 0.97 |
| recommendation_context | Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | Among the hybrids mentioned in Table 2, only Superior proved to have any value as a pollinizer. | 0.97 |
| entry_pedigree | Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii). | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | Said to have proven itself worthy of its name and to be one of the finest of all the plums. | 0.95 |
| productivity | Productivity is specifically praised. | 0.92 |
| fruit_color | Fruit is described as having good red color. | 0.93 |
| flavor_profile | Flavor, good red color, texture, size, and productivity are all praised. | 0.92 |
| fruit_size | Described as the largest of the Minnesota varieties. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Mid-season plum. | 0.97 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, | 0.94 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | 0.92 |
| taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.92 |
| table_axis_context | For Trial | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, "row_l | 0.94 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||