Cultivar 140: Superior

Taxon ID: 3

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 64 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: supported | claims=64 | sources=6 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: description_snippet:15, recommendation_context:11, storage_duration:5, source_reference_abbreviation:4, flavor_profile:3, fruit_color:3, fruit_size:3, taxon_context:3, column_scope_context:2, productivity:2, selection_origin_reference:2, caption_context:1, release_year_reference:1, table_axis_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search | taxon profile | taxonomy tree

Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links

Wiki Draft

Superior is a plum from the University of Minnesota. It was bred from Burbank x Kaga and distributed as a northern hybrid plum, not a European prune type [S3]. Sources place its introduction in 1932 or 1933. One prairie source says it was formerly known as Minn. 194 [S3] [S5]. It was listed for trial in South Dakota home fruit plantings and was widely sold by South Dakota nurseries. This shows it was broadly present in the northern nursery trade even where hardiness was not fully settled [S1] [S2].

The Minnesota bulletin describes the fruit in detail. It says the fruit is about 1 3/4 inches in both dimensions, cordate in form, with a pointed apex, red skin, medium bloom, and yellow flesh that is juicy and smooth [S3]. The same source rates the flavor very good and slightly tart near the skin. It also says bloom is in early May and ripening is in late August [S3]. A prairie orchard source describes the fruit as very large, conic, dark red with heavy bloom, and with yellow flesh that is tender, juicy, sprightly, and sweetish. It places the season later, from mid September to late September [S5]. These descriptions agree on a large, high quality red plum with yellow flesh, but they do not fully agree on season [S3] [S5].

Reports on the tree also give Superior a strong horticultural profile. The Minnesota bulletin calls it very vigorous, upright, and spreading, with good foliage, good fruit adherence, and heavy productivity, enough that thinning is often needed. It also notes slight susceptibility to leaf spot [S3]. This suggests a hardy breeding plum selected as much for tree performance and crop load as for dessert quality [S3].

Its cold climate record is mixed. South Dakota Extension listed it for trial in the milder and intermediate fruit growing parts of the state, not as a universally dependable plum [S1]. A Manitoba prairie source is more direct. It calls the tree tender at Morden and fruitful only after mild winters [S5]. The safest reading is that Superior was grown and tested in northern regions, but its winter performance was less dependable than that of the toughest prairie plums [S1] [S5].

In the broader archive, Superior belongs to the University of Minnesota plum breeding stream and has a clear historical pedigree through Burbank x Kaga [S3] [S5]. Later University of Minnesota research continued to use it as germplasm in fertility studies, where its seed germination and pollen storage behavior were measured alongside other winter hardy plums [S4]. Those studies are not evidence of parentage, but they do show that Superior remained part of the working northern Prunus collection decades after release [S4].

One notable modern research detail is that Superior's pollen stainability declined significantly after only three months in freezer storage. By the end of the experiment, it was one of the few plum cultivars in that study to fall below the general more-than-50-percent pattern [S4]. This does not change the cultivar's historical identity, but it adds an unusual reproductive note for breeders considering stored pollen use [S4].

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from 9c684c14 7509 4b78 a803 0bf01a64aa28, with 8 additional supporting sources linked below.

Featured source descriptions

“Form cordate; apex pointed with russeted point; cavity moderately wide and deep; suture continuous, a line; stem 1 inch long, thick.”
[9]
“Flesh is yellow, juicy, and has smooth texture.”
[9]
“Has good foliage and good fruit adherence.”
[9]
“Blooms early May and ripens late August.”
[9]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

Superior plum

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairierecommendation_tablerecommendedPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids0.84
ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hillsrecommendation_tablerecommendedPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids0.84

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
7Minnesota #1695unknown2000p46 p73 p80 p101 p107 p108 p109 p111For 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66% (CD), 6 months 56% (H), 7 months 53% (G), 8 months 56% (H), 9 months 49% (J).;
105Hardy fruits for Northern planting, trees, shrubs, 1937unknown1500p3 p8 p21Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.; Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937.; Listed under the Plum Trees section.; Supply noted as limited
112Pollination Studies with Stone Fruitsunknown1100p3 p4 p6 p7 p9Listed as the plum cultivar in row 4 of the recommended orchard arrangement.; Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.; The page suggests Superior may not be fully winter hardy in no
2South Dakota Fruit Garden (visual sample pages 9-11)public_domain600p1ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie; {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "not
106Daniels planting guide, 1950unknown600p23Said to have proven itself worthy of its name and to be one of the finest of all the plums.; Productivity is specifically praised.; Fruit is described as having good red color.; Flavor, good red color, texture, size, and
139Planting time, 1950 / Alpha Nurseryunknown600p7Fruit ripens over a long period.; Described as a heavy yielder.; Described as very large.; Described as juicy and sweet.

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
139p7description_snippetFruit ripens over a long period.SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder.page_block:0.90
139p7productivityDescribed as a heavy yielder.SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder.page_block:0.90
139p7fruit_sizeDescribed as very large.SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder.page_block:0.90
139p7flavor_profileDescribed as juicy and sweet.SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder.page_block:0.90
139p7fruit_colorRed skin and yellow flesh.SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder.page_block:0.90
139p7selection_origin_referenceDescribed as a plum from Minnesota.SUPERIOR—Awonderful plum from Minnesota. Red skin, yellow flesh, juicy and sweet, very large. Fruit ripens over a long period. Heavy yielder.page_block:0.90
105p21description_snippetIncluded among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.Plum Trees SUPERIORpage_block:0.90
105p21recommendation_contextOffered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937.Plum Trees SUPERIORpage_block:0.90
105p21taxon_contextListed under the Plum Trees section.Plum Trees SUPERIORpage_block:0.90
105p8recommendation_contextSupply noted as limited; readers are told to order early.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8description_snippetCan be peeled like a peach.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8flavor_profileDelicious quality.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8description_snippetFirm flesh.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8fruit_colorBeautiful red color.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8fruit_sizeFruit very large.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8description_snippetDescribed as a sensational new plum and considered the most perfect plum among fine plums introduced by the station.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p8selection_origin_referenceOriginated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.Superior (See color cut, front cover). This sensational new Plum was originated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm and is considered the most perfect Plum of all fine Plums introduced by the station.page_block:0.90
105p3recommendation_contextIncluded in the 12-tree Model Home Orchard assortment with 1 tree.SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4page_block:0.90
105p3caption_contextShown as a red plum illustration on this page.SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4page_block:0.90
105p3source_reference_abbreviationCross-referenced to page 4 for fuller description.SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4page_block:0.90
105p3recommendation_contextOffered at 3-4 ft. size for 55 cents each.SUPERIOR PLUM 3-4 feet, 55c each See page 4page_block:0.90
7p123storage_durationFor 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66% (CD), 6 months 56% (H), 7 months 53% ('Superior' 86% B-F 78% C 78% BC 72% H 62% G 66% CD 56% H 53% G 56% H 49% Jpage_block:0.90
7p118entry_locationCollection week is shown as Week 17.'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997page_block:0.90
7p118source_reference_abbreviationSource citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997.'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997page_block:0.90
7p118release_year_referenceIntroduction year listed as 1933.'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997page_block:0.90
7p112source_reference_abbreviationPrimary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability.Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at lepage_block:0.90
7p112entry_hardiness_observationSuperior appears to have lower retained pollen stainability relative to the majority group after nine months of storage.Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at lepage_block:0.90
7p112description_snippetSuperior is a plum cultivar named in the same pollen stainability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not stay above 50 percent stainability at experiment end.Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at lepage_block:0.90
7p111description_snippetCompared with other tested plum entries, Superior declines earlier under storage in this study.In contrast, Superior had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage.page_block:0.90
7p111storage_durationSuperior showed significant pollen stainability decline after only three months in storage.In contrast, Superior had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage.page_block:0.90
7p109storage_durationSignificant decrease in pollen stainability after only three months in storage.'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).page_block:0.90
7p108storage_durationSuperior had significant decreases in pollen stainability after only three months of storage.Average % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage whereas 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).page_block:0.90
7p107description_snippetSuperior was significantly different than Mount Royal for pollen stainability in Table 2.with Superior’ and La Crescent’ was also significantly different than ‘Mount Royal’ (Table 2).page_block:0.90
7p101description_snippetSuperior is the named cultivar with earlier significant pollen viability reduction relative to the seven-month decline timing of other named plums.Average % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.page_block:0.90
7p101storage_durationPollen stainability for Superior declined significantly after as few as three months of storage at -20°C.Average % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.page_block:0.90
7p80source_reference_abbreviationAsterisked values appear in-table and likely indicate statistical significance in this dataset.Plum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *.page_block:0.90
7p80description_snippetRow records 8.3 and 75.0 with asterisked significance, plus 8.3 and values 0.3, 3.0 with asterisks.Plum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *.page_block:0.90
7p80taxon_contextPlum row in Table 3 continuation.Plum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *.page_block:0.90
7p73description_snippetThe row is captured as 'Superior HRC x - -'.Superior HRC x - -page_block:0.90
7p73entry_locationCollection/source field on this row is HRC.Superior HRC x - -page_block:0.90
7p46description_snippetSuperior appears in the explicit plum trio with significant differences between scarified and non-scarified treatments (p<0.05).Within the plums Hennepin, Superior, and Winona there were significant differences for % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed (p<0.05; Table 3).page_block:0.90
112p9recommendation_contextListed as the plum cultivar in row 4 of the recommended orchard arrangement.4 Superiorpage_block:0.90
112p7recommendation_contextListed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Superior plumpage_block:0.90
112p6entry_hardiness_observationThe page suggests Superior may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota.Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility.page_block:0.90
112p6recommendation_contextTable 9 lists Superior among suggested plum varieties for planting.Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility.page_block:0.90
112p6recommendation_contextIncluded among pollinizers likely to be grown in home and commercial plantings even though compatibility is only fair in the discussion text.Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility.page_block:0.90
112p4entry_pedigreeSpecies/background listed as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. simonii).Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)page_block:0.90
112p4description_snippetBloom season: medium early.Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)page_block:0.90
112p4description_snippetPollinated 18 varieties tested.Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)page_block:0.90
112p4recommendation_contextRated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)page_block:0.90
112p3recommendation_contextAmong the hybrids mentioned in Table 2, only Superior proved to have any value as a pollinizer.Superior — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)page_block:0.90
112p3entry_pedigreeListed in Table 2 as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii).Superior — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)page_block:0.90
106p23recommendation_contextSaid to have proven itself worthy of its name and to be one of the finest of all the plums.SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties.page_block:0.90
106p23productivityProductivity is specifically praised.SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties.page_block:0.90
106p23fruit_colorFruit is described as having good red color.SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties.page_block:0.90
106p23flavor_profileFlavor, good red color, texture, size, and productivity are all praised.SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties.page_block:0.90
106p23fruit_sizeDescribed as the largest of the Minnesota varieties.SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties.page_block:0.90
106p23description_snippetMid-season plum.SUPERIOR—Mid-season. Largest of the Minnesota varieties.page_block:0.90
2p1column_scope_contextZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General PrairiePLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1taxon_contextPLUMS, Minn. HybridsPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1table_axis_contextFor TrialPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1structured_entry_json{"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "vPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1column_scope_contextZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black HillsPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1taxon_contextPLUMS, Minn. HybridsPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1table_axis_contextFor TrialPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90
2p1structured_entry_json{"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Superiorvisual_page_probe:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetFruit ripens over a long period.0.93
productivityDescribed as a heavy yielder.0.95
fruit_sizeDescribed as very large.0.94
flavor_profileDescribed as juicy and sweet.0.95
fruit_colorRed skin and yellow flesh.0.95
selection_origin_referenceDescribed as a plum from Minnesota.0.94
description_snippetIncluded among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.0.86
recommendation_contextOffered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937.0.98
taxon_contextListed under the Plum Trees section.0.99
recommendation_contextSupply noted as limited; readers are told to order early.0.88
description_snippetCan be peeled like a peach.0.91
flavor_profileDelicious quality.0.93
description_snippetFirm flesh.0.93
fruit_colorBeautiful red color.0.94
fruit_sizeFruit very large.0.96
description_snippetDescribed as a sensational new plum and considered the most perfect plum among fine plums introduced by the station.0.95
selection_origin_referenceOriginated at the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.0.98
recommendation_contextIncluded in the 12-tree Model Home Orchard assortment with 1 tree.0.94
caption_contextShown as a red plum illustration on this page.0.98
source_reference_abbreviationCross-referenced to page 4 for fuller description.0.97
recommendation_contextOffered at 3-4 ft. size for 55 cents each.0.99
storage_durationFor 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66% (CD), 6 months 56% (H), 7 months 53% (G), 8 months 56% (H), 9 months 49% (J).0.95
entry_locationCollection week is shown as Week 17.0.95
source_reference_abbreviationSource citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997.0.96
release_year_referenceIntroduction year listed as 1933.0.97
source_reference_abbreviationPrimary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability.0.86
entry_hardiness_observationSuperior appears to have lower retained pollen stainability relative to the majority group after nine months of storage.0.89
description_snippetSuperior is a plum cultivar named in the same pollen stainability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not stay above 50 percent stainability at experiment end.0.93
description_snippetCompared with other tested plum entries, Superior declines earlier under storage in this study.0.92
storage_durationSuperior showed significant pollen stainability decline after only three months in storage.0.99
storage_durationSignificant decrease in pollen stainability after only three months in storage.0.90
storage_durationSuperior had significant decreases in pollen stainability after only three months of storage.0.99
description_snippetSuperior was significantly different than Mount Royal for pollen stainability in Table 2.0.84
description_snippetSuperior is the named cultivar with earlier significant pollen viability reduction relative to the seven-month decline timing of other named plums.0.95
storage_durationPollen stainability for Superior declined significantly after as few as three months of storage at -20°C.0.97
source_reference_abbreviationAsterisked values appear in-table and likely indicate statistical significance in this dataset.0.84
description_snippetRow records 8.3 and 75.0 with asterisked significance, plus 8.3 and values 0.3, 3.0 with asterisks.0.90
taxon_contextPlum row in Table 3 continuation.0.99
description_snippetThe row is captured as 'Superior HRC x - -'.0.95
entry_locationCollection/source field on this row is HRC.0.99
description_snippetSuperior appears in the explicit plum trio with significant differences between scarified and non-scarified treatments (p<0.05).0.97
recommendation_contextListed as the plum cultivar in row 4 of the recommended orchard arrangement.0.96
recommendation_contextListed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.0.90
entry_hardiness_observationThe page suggests Superior may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota.0.90
recommendation_contextTable 9 lists Superior among suggested plum varieties for planting.0.96
recommendation_contextIncluded among pollinizers likely to be grown in home and commercial plantings even though compatibility is only fair in the discussion text.0.93
entry_pedigreeSpecies/background listed as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. simonii).0.98
description_snippetBloom season: medium early.0.97
description_snippetPollinated 18 varieties tested.0.97
recommendation_contextRated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.0.99
recommendation_contextAmong the hybrids mentioned in Table 2, only Superior proved to have any value as a pollinizer.0.97
entry_pedigreeListed in Table 2 as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii).0.99
recommendation_contextSaid to have proven itself worthy of its name and to be one of the finest of all the plums.0.95
productivityProductivity is specifically praised.0.92
fruit_colorFruit is described as having good red color.0.93
flavor_profileFlavor, good red color, texture, size, and productivity are all praised.0.92
fruit_sizeDescribed as the largest of the Minnesota varieties.0.98
description_snippetMid-season plum.0.97
column_scope_contextZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie0.92
structured_entry_json{"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, 0.94
column_scope_contextZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills0.92
taxon_contextPLUMS, Minn. Hybrids0.92
table_axis_contextFor Trial0.92
structured_entry_json{"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Superior", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, "row_l0.94

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.