Taxon ID: 3
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 52 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=52 | sources=4 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: description_snippet:18, storage_duration:6, recommendation_context:4, source_reference_abbreviation:4, column_scope_context:3, taxon_context:3, flavor_profile:1, fruit_size:1, productivity:1, recommendation_count_note:1, release_year_reference:1, table_axis_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search | taxon profile | taxonomy tree
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Monitor is a hardy plum hybrid linked to the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. Prairie sources describe it as a cross of Burbank x native plum and say it was introduced in 1920. South Dakota recommendations list it as a Minnesota hybrid plum for trial in all three fruit growing zones, and later nursery lists show it was sold there. [S4] [S1] [S2]
Prairie variety notes describe the tree as upright spreading, vigorous, and productive. The fruit is described as very large and roundish ovate, with dull bronze red skin and yellow flesh. It is tender, firm, juicy, and sweet. Quality is rated good, and the season is about mid September. [S4]
The clearest evidence for hardiness here is geographic, not a formal zone rating. South Dakota Extension listed Monitor for trial from the milder southern border districts to the plains of the northern two thirds of the state. That places it in broad northern prairie testing, not just favored sites. Its inclusion in a prairie orchard bulletin from Morden also fits that cold climate context. [S1] [S4]
Later University of Minnesota thesis work treats Monitor as a plum under Prunus spp. and follows it mainly as breeding material, not as a fruit description. In those experiments, it showed variable seed germination across environments and storage treatments, produced some root suckers in greenhouse grown seedlings, and had pollen stainability that dropped significantly after about seven months of storage. By the end of the storage experiment, it was one of the few plum cultivars below the general >50% stainability pattern. These results add biological context, but they do not change the older orchard picture of Monitor as a productive, large fruited prairie plum hybrid. [S3] [S4]
Within the archive, Monitor belongs to the older northern plum breeding stream that combined named cultivars with native material to produce larger fruited plums for cold regions. The surviving source trail is stronger on orchard description and regional adaptation than on breeder biography or naming history. [S4] [S1]
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from Minnesota #1695, with 4 additional supporting sources linked below.
Featured source descriptions
“Monitor is a plum cultivar used in field initial stem diameter analysis and is the lower anchor of the stated field range (1.16 mm).”
— [1]
“Replications of seedlings from 'Monitor' germinated in the greenhouse produced one or more root suckers during the experiment.”
— [1]
“For seed stored for 25 months in the field environment of Experiment II, average percent germination was 4.2% (Table 5).”
— [1]
“There were ≤ 4 replications from 'Monitor' that produced suckers.”
— [1]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: Genus: Prunus | open genus tree
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 | ||
| ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 | ||
| ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 |
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Minnesota #1695 | unknown | 31 | 0 | 0 | p47 p48 p49 p50 p52 p73 p80 p84 | Its row includes group letters A-F, BC, A-C, B-G, B-G, B-D, D-H, D-G, GH, and J by month.; Monitor has stored values of 87%, 85%, 86%, 88%, 81%, 76%, 75%, 70%, 58%, and 48% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months res |
| 2 | South Dakota Fruit Garden (visual sample pages 9-11) | public_domain | 9 | 0 | 0 | p1 | LaCrescent (yellow); ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State; {"column_label": "ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": ["LaCrescent (yellow)"], "page_number": |
| 105 | Hardy fruits for Northern planting, trees, shrubs, 1937 | unknown | 9 | 0 | 0 | p8 p21 | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm.; Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937.; Listed under the Plum Trees section.; Season is late August. |
| 112 | Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits | unknown | 3 | 0 | 0 | p3 p4 | Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.; Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.; Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid. |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105 | p21 | description_snippet | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | Plum Trees MONITOR | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | recommendation_context | Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937. | Plum Trees MONITOR | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p21 | taxon_context | Listed under the Plum Trees section. | Plum Trees MONITOR | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | description_snippet | Season is late August. | Monitor is one of the market Plums we have been looking for here in the Northwest. It has high quality, firm flesh and a large size. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | productivity | Very productive and a regular bearer. | Monitor is one of the market Plums we have been looking for here in the Northwest. It has high quality, firm flesh and a large size. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | fruit_size | Large size, some fruits more than 1 3/4 inches in diameter. | Monitor is one of the market Plums we have been looking for here in the Northwest. It has high quality, firm flesh and a large size. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | description_snippet | Firm flesh. | Monitor is one of the market Plums we have been looking for here in the Northwest. It has high quality, firm flesh and a large size. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | flavor_profile | High quality. | Monitor is one of the market Plums we have been looking for here in the Northwest. It has high quality, firm flesh and a large size. | page_block:0.90 |
| 105 | p8 | recommendation_context | Presented as one of the market plums sought for the Northwest. | Monitor is one of the market Plums we have been looking for here in the Northwest. It has high quality, firm flesh and a large size. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p122 | description_snippet | Its row includes group letters A-F, BC, A-C, B-G, B-G, B-D, D-H, D-G, GH, and Jby month. | 'Monitor' 87% A-F 85% BC 86% A-C 88% B-G 81% B-G 76% B-D 75% D-H 70% D-G 58% GH 48% J | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p122 | storage_duration | Monitor has stored values of 87%, 85%, 86%, 88%, 81%, 76%, 75%, 70%, 58%, and 48% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months respectively. | 'Monitor' 87% A-F 85% BC 86% A-C 88% B-G 81% B-G 76% B-D 75% D-H 70% D-G 58% GH 48% J | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | entry_location | Collection week is shown as Week 18. | 'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | source_reference_abbreviation | Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997. | 'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | release_year_reference | Introduction year listed as 1920. | 'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p112 | source_reference_abbreviation | Primary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability. | Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at le | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p112 | entry_hardiness_observation | Monitor's pollen longevity in storage appears lower than the page-level majority, while many cultivars remained above 50 percent stainability over approximately nine months. | Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at le | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p112 | description_snippet | Monitor is a plum cultivar named in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not retain more than 50 percent stainability at t | Except for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at le | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p111 | source_reference_abbreviation | Statistical change is reported with reference to the study’s Table 2 data. | After seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums La Crescent, Monitor, and Toka. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p111 | storage_duration | Monitor pollen showed significant stainability decline after seven months in storage. | After seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums La Crescent, Monitor, and Toka. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p109 | storage_duration | Stainability declined significantly after seven or more months in storage. | Average % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p108 | storage_duration | Monitor showed significant decreases in pollen stainability after seven or more months of storage. | Average % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage whereas 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p101 | description_snippet | Monitor is included with La Crescent and Toka as plum cultivars with significant storage-related decline. | Average % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p101 | storage_duration | Pollen stainability for Monitor decreased significantly after seven months of storage at -20°C. | Average % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p88 | source_reference_abbreviation | Entry is embedded in Table 6: Continued with no separate figure or narrative context on this page. | Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ 51.0 ab 4.29 bc 0.19 4.53 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p88 | description_snippet | Prunus spp. 'Monitor' appears with the values 51.0 ab, 4.29 bc, 0.19, and 4.53 in the continuation table row set. | Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ 51.0 ab 4.29 bc 0.19 4.53 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p86 | description_snippet | Included in the plum continuation of Table 5. | Table 5: Continued ... 'Monitor' 4.2 d 0.0 c | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p86 | storage_duration | Plum 'Monitor' field germination was 4.2% at 25 months and 0.0% at 1 month (Table 5). | Table 5: Continued ... 'Monitor' 4.2 d 0.0 c | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p84 | description_snippet | Mean weeks to germination are 2.1 (non-scarified) and 2.0 (scarified). | 'Monitor' 54.2 abcd 66.7 2.1 2.0 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p84 | description_snippet | Monitor shows non-scarified germination of 54.2 with group abcd and scarified germination of 66.7. | 'Monitor' 54.2 abcd 66.7 2.1 2.0 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | description_snippet | Row includes treatment values 25.0 and 33.3 plus trailing values 16.7, 0.8, 1.9 with annotations abc / ab / bcde. | Plum 'Monitor' 25.0 abc 33.3 ab; 16.7 bcde; 0.8; 1.9. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | taxon_context | This cultivar entry is part of the Plum rows in Table 3. | Plum 'Monitor' 25.0 abc 33.3 ab; 16.7 bcde; 0.8; 1.9. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p73 | description_snippet | The row is captured as 'Monitor HRC x x 13 2'. | Monitor HRC x x 13 2 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p73 | entry_location | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | Monitor HRC x x 13 2 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p52 | recommendation_context | Its variable germination is presented as potentially reducing relative invasiveness versus high-germinating cultivars. | "Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p52 | description_snippet | Germination pattern was variable across environments, scarification, and storage conditions. | "Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p50 | description_snippet | Monitor is referenced as a plum cultivar with single replications in Table 9. | Replications from Hazel and South Dakota, and single replications from Compass, Gracious, Monitor, and Whittaker (Table 9). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p49 | description_snippet | Monitor had fewer than four greenhouse replications producing root suckers (Table 9). | ... from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). ... There were < 4 replications from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', and 'Whittake | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p49 | description_snippet | Monitor was among the cultivars with root suckers in greenhouse replications. | ... from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). ... There were < 4 replications from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', and 'Whittake | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p48 | description_snippet | Monitor is a plum cultivar used in field initial stem diameter analysis and is the lower anchor of the stated field range (1.16 mm). | Averages for seedlings started in the field ranged from 1.16 mm for seedlings from 'Monitor' to 2.39 mm for seedlings from 'Todd' with 'Todd' differing significantly from a number of plum cultivars (Table 7). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p47 | entry_hardiness_observation | In 25-month field storage tests, 'Monitor' is at the low end of the plum germination range at 4.2% (Table 5). | For seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5). | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | recommendation_context | Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor. | Monitor | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p3 | description_snippet | Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2. | Monitor — P. salicina hybrid | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p3 | entry_pedigree | Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid. | Monitor — P. salicina hybrid | page_block:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | recommendation_count_note | LaCrescent (yellow) | Monitor LaCrescent (yellow) | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": ["LaCrescent (yellow)"], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_ | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "vi | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_t | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | Monitor | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | Included among sturdy, vigorous trees and plants grown by the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm. | 0.86 |
| recommendation_context | Offered as one of the free membership premium choices for 1937. | 0.98 |
| taxon_context | Listed under the Plum Trees section. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Season is late August. | 0.95 |
| productivity | Very productive and a regular bearer. | 0.96 |
| fruit_size | Large size, some fruits more than 1 3/4 inches in diameter. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Firm flesh. | 0.92 |
| flavor_profile | High quality. | 0.92 |
| recommendation_context | Presented as one of the market plums sought for the Northwest. | 0.95 |
| description_snippet | Its row includes group letters A-F, BC, A-C, B-G, B-G, B-D, D-H, D-G, GH, and J by month. | 0.86 |
| storage_duration | Monitor has stored values of 87%, 85%, 86%, 88%, 81%, 76%, 75%, 70%, 58%, and 48% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months respectively. | 0.93 |
| entry_location | Collection week is shown as Week 18. | 0.95 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997. | 0.96 |
| release_year_reference | Introduction year listed as 1920. | 0.97 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Primary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability. | 0.86 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | Monitor's pollen longevity in storage appears lower than the page-level majority, while many cultivars remained above 50 percent stainability over approximately nine months. | 0.89 |
| description_snippet | Monitor is a plum cultivar named in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not retain more than 50 percent stainability at the end of the storage experiment. | 0.93 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Statistical change is reported with reference to the study’s Table 2 data. | 0.86 |
| storage_duration | Monitor pollen showed significant stainability decline after seven months in storage. | 0.98 |
| storage_duration | Stainability declined significantly after seven or more months in storage. | 0.88 |
| storage_duration | Monitor showed significant decreases in pollen stainability after seven or more months of storage. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Monitor is included with La Crescent and Toka as plum cultivars with significant storage-related decline. | 0.94 |
| storage_duration | Pollen stainability for Monitor decreased significantly after seven months of storage at -20°C. | 0.96 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Entry is embedded in Table 6: Continued with no separate figure or narrative context on this page. | 0.95 |
| description_snippet | Prunus spp. 'Monitor' appears with the values 51.0 ab, 4.29 bc, 0.19, and 4.53 in the continuation table row set. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Included in the plum continuation of Table 5. | 0.99 |
| storage_duration | Plum 'Monitor' field germination was 4.2% at 25 months and 0.0% at 1 month (Table 5). | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Mean weeks to germination are 2.1 (non-scarified) and 2.0 (scarified). | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Monitor shows non-scarified germination of 54.2 with group abcd and scarified germination of 66.7. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Row includes treatment values 25.0 and 33.3 plus trailing values 16.7, 0.8, 1.9 with annotations abc / ab / bcde. | 0.90 |
| taxon_context | This cultivar entry is part of the Plum rows in Table 3. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | The row is captured as 'Monitor HRC x x 13 2'. | 0.95 |
| entry_location | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | 0.99 |
| recommendation_context | Its variable germination is presented as potentially reducing relative invasiveness versus high-germinating cultivars. | 0.81 |
| description_snippet | Germination pattern was variable across environments, scarification, and storage conditions. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Monitor is referenced as a plum cultivar with single replications in Table 9. | 0.90 |
| description_snippet | Monitor had fewer than four greenhouse replications producing root suckers (Table 9). | 0.93 |
| description_snippet | Monitor was among the cultivars with root suckers in greenhouse replications. | 0.95 |
| description_snippet | Monitor is a plum cultivar used in field initial stem diameter analysis and is the lower anchor of the stated field range (1.16 mm). | 0.95 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | In 25-month field storage tests, 'Monitor' is at the low end of the plum germination range at 4.2% (Table 5). | 0.90 |
| recommendation_context | Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2. | 0.84 |
| entry_pedigree | Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid. | 0.97 |
| recommendation_count_note | LaCrescent (yellow) | 0.92 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE III All Rest and Northern two-thirds of State", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": ["LaCrescent (yellow)"], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, "row_label": | 0.94 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, " | 0.94 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills | 0.92 |
| taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.92 |
| table_axis_context | For Trial | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE I Southern Border, Lincoln Co., West & lower Valleys around Black Hills", "cultivar_name": "Monitor", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, "row_la | 0.94 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||