Taxon ID: 3
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 25 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=25 | sources=4 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: description_snippet:8, taxon_context:3, recommendation_context:2, column_scope_context:1, culinary_use:1, flavor_profile:1, fruit_color:1, fruit_size:1, productivity:1, selection_origin_reference:1, storage_duration:1, table_axis_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search | taxon profile | taxonomy tree
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Pipestone is a cold climate plum introduced from the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm in 1942 under the earlier designation Minn. 218. Prairie sources describe it as a large, high quality red plum, not just a trial selection. [S3] [S6] It was also listed for trial among Minnesota hybrid plums in South Dakota Zone II and appeared in nursery trade listings there. This shows that it moved beyond station records into regional recommendation and commerce. [S1] [S2]
Its history is not fully settled. A University of Minnesota bulletin gives its parentage as Burbank x (Burbank x Wolf) and says the University of Minnesota introduced it in 1942. [S3] A prairie orchard source also ties it to the Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm, says it was formerly known as Minn. 218, and gives the cross as Prunus salicina x Prunus americana. [S6] A later prairie index instead lists Pipestone as P. nigra x P. salicina from the University of Saskatchewan with the year 1960. [S5] Sources disagree on both parentage and whether the key introduction belongs with Minnesota in 1942 or with a Saskatchewan record in 1960. [S3] [S5] [S6]
The fruit is described as very large, up to about 1 3/8 inches in both length and width. It is cordate to round conic in form, with deep red skin, a fairly heavy gray or blue bloom, and bright yellow flesh. [S3] [S6] Sources describe the skin as thin but tough, and the flesh as juicy, tender, melting to medium firm. The flavor is sweet and pleasant, and quality is rated very good to excellent. [S3] [S6] It blooms in early May and ripens from late August into early September. [S3] [S6]
Tree descriptions are broadly consistent. Pipestone is described as upright to spreading, moderately vigorous to vigorous, large, hardy, and productive, with fair fruit adherence. [S3] [S6] The South Dakota recommendation table places it only for trial in Zone II rather than among the broadest statewide standards. But the Morden note calls it hardy and productive there, which gives it clear prairie relevance. [S1] [S6]
In the archive, Pipestone matters as part of the northern plum breeding stream that linked Minnesota evaluation work, prairie orchard testing, and later regional nursery distribution. [S2] [S3] [S6] Later University of Minnesota thesis data show that its seed and seedlings were still being studied for germination, seedling growth, herbivory, and survival. This preserves it as living breeding material as well as a named fruit. [S4]
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from 9c684c14 7509 4b78 a803 0bf01a64aa28, with 6 additional supporting sources linked below.
Featured source descriptions
“Origin: University of Minnesota, introduced in 1942.”
— [7]
“Fruit form cordate with broadly pointed apex depressed at tip; cavity moderately wide and deep; suture definite, a line.”
— [7]
“Skin moderately thin, tough, slightly astringent.”
— [7]
“Blooms early May and ripens late August.”
— [7]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: Genus: Prunus | open genus tree
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | recommendation_table | recommended | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.84 |
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Minnesota #1695 | unknown | 12 | 0 | 0 | p47 p50 p73 p80 p84 p86 p89 | The row is under the Fruit Type heading Plum and column species value Prunus spp.; Listed under Table 6 (Female Parent Greenhouse Replication, Plum section) with female-parent growth measurements: Height 74.6 cm, stem di |
| 106 | Daniels planting guide, 1950 | unknown | 8 | 0 | 0 | p23 | Described as an excellent canner.; Described as a very heavy producer.; Fruit is described as high in quality.; Early in season. |
| 2 | South Dakota Fruit Garden (visual sample pages 9-11) | public_domain | 4 | 0 | 0 | p1 | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie; PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids; For Trial; {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", |
| 112 | Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits | unknown | 1 | 0 | 0 | p4 | Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor. |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | p89 | taxon_context | The row is under the Fruit Type heading Plum and column species value Prunus spp. | Plum Prunus spp. 'Pipestone' 74.6 ab 5.98 abc 0.02 0.09 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p89 | description_snippet | Listed under Table 6 (Female Parent Greenhouse Replication, Plum section) with female-parent growth measurements: Height 74.6 cm, stem diameter 5.98 mm, change in stem diameter 0.0 | Plum Prunus spp. 'Pipestone' 74.6 ab 5.98 abc 0.02 0.09 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p86 | description_snippet | Table row listed under the plum section of Table 5. | Table 5: Continued ... 'Pipestone' 4.2 d 12.5 ab | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p86 | storage_duration | Plum 'Pipestone' had 4.2% germination at 25 months and 12.5% at 1 month in Table 5. | Table 5: Continued ... 'Pipestone' 4.2 d 12.5 ab | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p84 | description_snippet | Mean weeks to germination are 2.0 (non-scarified) and 1.5 (scarified). | 'Pipestone' 12.5 de 29.2 2.0 1.5 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p84 | description_snippet | Pipestone shows non-scarified germination of 12.5 with group de and scarified germination of 29.2. | 'Pipestone' 12.5 de 29.2 2.0 1.5 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | description_snippet | Row reads 41.7 and 50.0 with subsequent values 8.3, 2.0, 1.7 and significance labels abc / ab / cde. | Plum 'Pipestone' 41.7 abc 50.0 ab; 8.3 cde; 2.0; 1.7. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p80 | taxon_context | Entry is a plum cultivar row in Table 3. | Plum 'Pipestone' 41.7 abc 50.0 ab; 8.3 cde; 2.0; 1.7. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p73 | description_snippet | The row is captured as 'Pipestone HRC x x 6 4'. | Pipestone HRC x x 6 4 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p73 | entry_location | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | Pipestone HRC x x 6 4 | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p50 | description_snippet | Greenhouse survival at the end of Experiment III was reported as 33% for Pipestone seedlings (Table 10). | At the end of Experiment III, % survival among plum seedlings started in the greenhouse ranged from 33% for seedlings from Pipestone to 89% for seedlings from Mount Royal (Table 10). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p47 | entry_hardiness_observation | In 25-month field storage tests, 'Pipestone' is in the low germination group at 4.2% (Table 5). | For seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5). | page_block:0.90 |
| 112 | p4 | recommendation_context | Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor. | Pipestone | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | culinary_use | Described as an excellent canner. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | productivity | Described as a very heavy producer. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | flavor_profile | Fruit is described as high in quality. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | description_snippet | Early in season. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | fruit_size | Described as one of the largest plums. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | fruit_color | Fruit is of good red color. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | recommendation_context | Rated by experts as one of the best of them all. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 106 | p23 | selection_origin_reference | Described as one of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm. | PIPESTONE—One of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm | page_block:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | column_scope_context | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Pipestone | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Pipestone | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | table_axis_context | For Trial | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Pipestone | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| 2 | p1 | structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Pipestone", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": " | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | For Trial | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | Pipestone | visual_page_probe:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| taxon_context | The row is under the Fruit Type heading Plum and column species value Prunus spp. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Listed under Table 6 (Female Parent Greenhouse Replication, Plum section) with female-parent growth measurements: Height 74.6 cm, stem diameter 5.98 mm, change in stem diameter 0.02 mm, ΔTCA 0.09 mm2. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Table row listed under the plum section of Table 5. | 0.99 |
| storage_duration | Plum 'Pipestone' had 4.2% germination at 25 months and 12.5% at 1 month in Table 5. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Mean weeks to germination are 2.0 (non-scarified) and 1.5 (scarified). | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Pipestone shows non-scarified germination of 12.5 with group de and scarified germination of 29.2. | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Row reads 41.7 and 50.0 with subsequent values 8.3, 2.0, 1.7 and significance labels abc / ab / cde. | 0.90 |
| taxon_context | Entry is a plum cultivar row in Table 3. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | The row is captured as 'Pipestone HRC x x 6 4'. | 0.95 |
| entry_location | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Greenhouse survival at the end of Experiment III was reported as 33% for Pipestone seedlings (Table 10). | 0.96 |
| entry_hardiness_observation | In 25-month field storage tests, 'Pipestone' is in the low germination group at 4.2% (Table 5). | 0.90 |
| recommendation_context | Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor. | 0.99 |
| culinary_use | Described as an excellent canner. | 0.95 |
| productivity | Described as a very heavy producer. | 0.94 |
| flavor_profile | Fruit is described as high in quality. | 0.90 |
| description_snippet | Early in season. | 0.91 |
| fruit_size | Described as one of the largest plums. | 0.95 |
| fruit_color | Fruit is of good red color. | 0.96 |
| recommendation_context | Rated by experts as one of the best of them all. | 0.95 |
| selection_origin_reference | Described as one of the most recent introductions of the State Fruit Breeding Farm. | 0.98 |
| column_scope_context | ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie | 0.92 |
| taxon_context | PLUMS, Minn. Hybrids | 0.92 |
| table_axis_context | For Trial | 0.92 |
| structured_entry_json | {"column_label": "ZONE II Counties in Minne-sota that have North Slopes & Valleys of General Prairie", "cultivar_name": "Pipestone", "notes": [], "page_number": 1, "parser_mode": "visual_table_page", "row_context": null, | 0.94 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||