New Haskap Varieties from the University of Saskatchewan

Document 147

Title: New Haskap Varieties from the University of Saskatchewan

Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/haskap/new_varieties.pdf

Archive provenance: raw historical corpus ingest queue backfill 2026-05-02 | source_site=research-groups.usask.ca | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | local_archive=/home/doug/src/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_04_second_corpus/new_varieties.pdf

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 30

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program

Publisher: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program

Site: research-groups.usask.ca

Year: 2007

Page count:

Type: cultivar release handout

Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1

Relationship Records

IDRelationSourceTargetSource Doc
497mentioned_in_documentUniversity Of SaskatchewanNew Haskap Varieties from the University of Saskatchewan147

History Records

IDTypeYearLabel
1065year_reference2007Year reference 2007
1067institution_mention2007University Of Saskatchewan
1066selection_origin_eventSelection origin Haskap

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

5 additional parsed names from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Select a linked cultivar to inspect the raw parsed details from this document beside the source PDF.

Citation focus: no focus applied

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

PageTypeQuoteClaimEntityJump
1recommendation_context‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough May be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time, stated with a 2007 time reference.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
1release_year_reference‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough The page evaluates Tundra in the context of commercial production at this time (2007).cultivar 1889Open Review parse
1fruit_size‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough Fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles currently available in Canada.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
1flavor_profile‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough Ranked almost at the top for flavour and fruit size; fruit was tender enough to melt in the mouth.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
1culinary_use‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough Firmness and lack of bleeding from the stem end when picked could make Tundra especially suited for Individually Quick Frozen (IQF) processicultivar 1889Open Review parse
1description_snippet‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough Firm fruit withstanding commercial harvesting and sorting was described as rare, especially for large-fruited blue honeysuckles.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
1release_year_reference‘Borealis’ has the distinction of having the best testing and largest fruit size in our breeding program as of 2007.Borealis was described as having the best tasting and largest fruit size in the breeding program as of 2007.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
1fruit_size‘Borealis’ has the distinction of having the best testing and largest fruit size in our breeding program as of 2007.Fruits were usually twice the size of any of the 35 Russian varieties in the collection of similar age.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
1flavor_profile‘Borealis’ has the distinction of having the best testing and largest fruit size in our breeding program as of 2007.Chosen by the breeder and a University panel as having the best flavour; a Japanese company also chose it as the best tasting of 43 samples.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
1culinary_use‘Borealis’ has the distinction of having the best testing and largest fruit size in our breeding program as of 2007.Not suitable for IQF because it does not have the firmness of Tundra and tends to get mushy when handled with equipment.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
1recommendation_context‘Borealis’ has the distinction of having the best testing and largest fruit size in our breeding program as of 2007.May be best for home gardeners or U-pick operations that can hand pick the delicate fruit.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
1description_snippet‘Borealis’ has the distinction of having the best testing and largest fruit size in our breeding program as of 2007.If shake harvested, the berries will be damaged and need quick processing.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
2fruit_sizeCharacteristics table lists Borealis with wet scar, average yield, 1.62 g average fruit weight, small + bb fruit end, short flat boxy fruit shape, sweet tart flavour, stems a, integrity c+.Average fruit weight is listed as 1.62 g in the 2007 table.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
2flavor_profileCharacteristics table lists Borealis with wet scar, average yield, 1.62 g average fruit weight, small + bb fruit end, short flat boxy fruit shape, sweet tart flavour, stems a, integrity c+.Flavour is listed as sweet tart.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
2productivityCharacteristics table lists Borealis with wet scar, average yield, 1.62 g average fruit weight, small + bb fruit end, short flat boxy fruit shape, sweet tart flavour, stems a, integrity c+.Yield is listed as average.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
2description_snippetCharacteristics table lists Borealis with wet scar, average yield, 1.62 g average fruit weight, small + bb fruit end, short flat boxy fruit shape, sweet tart flavour, stems a, integrity c+.Fruit shape is listed as short flat boxy; fruit end is listed as small + bb.cultivar 1888Open Review parse
2fruit_sizeCharacteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a.Average fruit weight is listed as 1.49 g in the 2007 table.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
2flavor_profileCharacteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a.Flavour is listed as sweet tangy.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
2productivityCharacteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a.Yield is listed as average.cultivar 1889Open Review parse
2description_snippetCharacteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a.Fruit shape is listed as long flat bullet oval, with a small fruit end.cultivar 1889Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

IDCultivarEvidence / ClaimsRelationshipsHistory / PagesLink
1888Borealis1300Open cultivar
1889Tundra1200Open cultivar
parsed only9-91902No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only9.15802No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only9-92601No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only9-15501No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only9.92502No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 1

History events: 3

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

StatusLicenseHolder
unknown

Credibility Records

TierScoreAssessorRationale
tier_355autoUnclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation

Translation Records

Source LangTarget LangMethodStatusNote
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation IDScoreRiskAssessorRationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

StatusVisibilityReviewerNote
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

TypeValueConfidence
institution_candidateUniversity of Saskatchewan0.60
taxon_keywordlonicera0.65
taxon_keywordvaccinium0.65
taxon_keywordhaskap0.75

Extracted Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetThus sweet tangy is sweeter than tangy sweet.0.54
culinary_usejuice released from damaged fruit0.56
selection_origin_referenceHaskap0.57
institution_referenceUniversity of Saskatchewan0.60
year_reference20070.55