Document 147
Title: New Haskap Varieties from the University of Saskatchewan
Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/haskap/new_varieties.pdf
Archive provenance: raw historical corpus ingest queue backfill 2026-05-02 | source_site=research-groups.usask.ca | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | local_archive=/home/doug/src/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_04_second_corpus/new_varieties.pdf
Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown
Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 30
Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 1
Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program
Publisher: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program
Site: research-groups.usask.ca
Year: 2007
Page count:
Type: cultivar release handout
Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1
| ID | Relation | Source | Target | Source Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 497 | mentioned_in_document | University Of Saskatchewan | New Haskap Varieties from the University of Saskatchewan | 147 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1065 | year_reference | 2007 | Year reference 2007 |
| 1067 | institution_mention | 2007 | University Of Saskatchewan |
| 1066 | selection_origin_event | Selection origin Haskap |
Cultivar: Tundra
| Page | Basis | Snippet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | explicit_cultivar_reference | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough to melt in the mouth. |
| 2 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Characteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a. |
| Page | Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | recommendation_context | May be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time, stated with a 2007 time reference. | 0.98 |
| 1 | release_year_reference | The page evaluates Tundra in the context of commercial production at this time (2007). | 0.9 |
| 1 | fruit_size | Fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles currently available in Canada. | 0.98 |
| 1 | flavor_profile | Ranked almost at the top for flavour and fruit size; fruit was tender enough to melt in the mouth. | 0.95 |
| 1 | culinary_use | Firmness and lack of bleeding from the stem end when picked could make Tundra especially suited for Individually Quick Frozen (IQF) processing. | 0.97 |
| 1 | description_snippet | Firm fruit withstanding commercial harvesting and sorting was described as rare, especially for large-fruited blue honeysuckles. | 0.95 |
| 1 | recommendation_context | Fruit shape was deemed acceptable for the Japanese market. | 0.95 |
| 2 | fruit_size | Average fruit weight is listed as 1.49 g in the 2007 table. | 0.93 |
| 2 | flavor_profile | Flavour is listed as sweet tangy. | 0.92 |
| 2 | productivity | Yield is listed as average. | 0.9 |
| 2 | description_snippet | Fruit shape is listed as long flat bullet oval, with a small fruit end. | 0.9 |
| 2 | description_snippet | Scar is listed as dry; stems rating is a; integrity rating is a. | 0.91 |
Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Tundra (ID 1889) within document 147. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.
Citation focus: cultivar focus: Tundra (ID 1889) | page focus: 1 (auto)
Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.
| Page | Type | Quote | Claim | Entity | Jump |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | recommendation_context | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough | May be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time, stated with a 2007 time reference. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | release_year_reference | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough | The page evaluates Tundra in the context of commercial production at this time (2007). | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | fruit_size | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough | Fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles currently available in Canada. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | flavor_profile | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough | Ranked almost at the top for flavour and fruit size; fruit was tender enough to melt in the mouth. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | culinary_use | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough | Firmness and lack of bleeding from the stem end when picked could make Tundra especially suited for Individually Quick Frozen (IQF) processi | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | description_snippet | ‘Tundra’ may be the variety best suited for commercial production at this time (2007). Tundra’s fruits were firm enough to withstand commercial harvesting and sorting at the University of Saskatchewan, yet tender enough | Firm fruit withstanding commercial harvesting and sorting was described as rare, especially for large-fruited blue honeysuckles. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | fruit_size | Characteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a. | Average fruit weight is listed as 1.49 g in the 2007 table. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | flavor_profile | Characteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a. | Flavour is listed as sweet tangy. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | productivity | Characteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a. | Yield is listed as average. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | description_snippet | Characteristics table lists Tundra with dry scar, average yield, 1.49 g average fruit weight, small fruit end, long flat bullet oval fruit shape, sweet tangy flavour, stems a, integrity a. | Fruit shape is listed as long flat bullet oval, with a small fruit end. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.
| ID | Cultivar | Evidence / Claims | Relationships | History / Pages | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1888 | Borealis | 13 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1889 | Tundra | 12 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| parsed only | 9-91 | 9 | 0 | 2 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9.15 | 8 | 0 | 2 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9-92 | 6 | 0 | 1 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9-15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9.92 | 5 | 0 | 2 | No staging cultivar page yet |
Relationships: 1
History events: 3
These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.
| Status | License | Holder |
|---|---|---|
| unknown |
| Tier | Score | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| tier_3 | 55 | auto | Unclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation |
| Source Lang | Target Lang | Method | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation records. | ||||
| Translation ID | Score | Risk | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation assessments. | ||||
| Status | Visibility | Reviewer | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| No publication records. | |||
| Type | Value | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| institution_candidate | University of Saskatchewan | 0.60 |
| taxon_keyword | lonicera | 0.65 |
| taxon_keyword | vaccinium | 0.65 |
| taxon_keyword | haskap | 0.75 |
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | Thus sweet tangy is sweeter than tangy sweet. | 0.54 |
| culinary_use | juice released from damaged fruit | 0.56 |
| selection_origin_reference | Haskap | 0.57 |
| institution_reference | University of Saskatchewan | 0.60 |
| year_reference | 2007 | 0.55 |