Document 108
Title: Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009
Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/cherrys/Juliet-notes.pdf
Archive provenance: discovery_round_01 curated pdf import | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | source_root=https://research-groups.usask.ca | local_archive=/usr/local/var/www/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_01_second_corpus/Juliet-notes.pdf
Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown
Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 71
Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 1
Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program
Publisher:
Site:
Year:
Page count:
Type: cultivar observation notes
Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1
# Document Assessment
This document looks useful, but only parts of it appear to be strong cultivar pages. It still contains cultivar-bearing pages, but they are mostly mixed narrative pages rather than clean directory or table layouts.
The title suggests a summary or notes document rather than a formal release bulletin.
Continue focusing on the likely cultivar pages rather than spending tokens on the whole document.
| ID | Relation | Source | Target | Source Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog relationships linked to this document. | ||||
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 756 | year_reference | 2004 | Year reference 2004 |
| 759 | release_event | 2004 | Release event 2004 |
| 757 | year_reference | 2006 | Year reference 2006 |
| 754 | year_reference | 2008 | Year reference 2008 |
| 758 | cross_event | 2008 | usually 4o Bri x higher than Carmine Jewel but that |
| 755 | year_reference | 2009 | Year reference 2009 |
Cultivar: Juliet
| Page | Basis | Snippet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | introduction_sentence | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 |
| 2 | introduction_sentence | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. |
| 3 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK. |
| Page | Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | description_snippet | Juliet was sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette. | 0.99 |
| 1 | selection_origin_reference | Juliet was originally released under breeding number 7-21-32.0. | 0.99 |
| 1 | anecdote_snippet | One propagator temporarily and unauthorizedly called Juliet 'Bob'. | 0.97 |
| 1 | release_year_reference | Juliet was released in 2004. | 0.99 |
| 1 | description_snippet | Juliet was formally renamed Juliet in 2006. | 0.98 |
| 1 | taxon_context | Juliet is part of the Romance Series. | 0.98 |
| 1 | productivity | In the 2004 planting of Romance cherries and Carmine Jewel, most trees began fruiting in 2008; by 2009 Juliet had similar yields to Valentine and Carmine Jewel and was coming close to full production. | 0.94 |
| 1 | entry_hardiness_observation | The winter of 2008/2009 caused no damage to Juliet bushes. | 0.98 |
| 1 | entry_hardiness_observation | Juliet went into full bloom 3 days before all the other varieties. | 0.97 |
| 1 | entry_hardiness_observation | Juliet bloom was very even across all branches and all trees, which further indicated good winter hardiness. | 0.95 |
| 1 | entry_hardiness_observation | Earlier bloom may carry some risk if a late frost occurs. | 0.91 |
| 1 | caption_context | Figure 1 shows Juliet flowers. | 0.99 |
| 1 | caption_context | Figure 2 shows fully ripe Juliet fruit. | 0.99 |
| 2 | fruit_size | Juliet is described as having optimum fruit size, defined here as the largest fruit size that can easily fit into a commercial cherry pitter. | 0.98 |
| 2 | fruit_color | Juliet fruit color is described as a deep burgundy red, though not as intense as Carmine Jewel. | 0.96 |
| 2 | flavor_profile | Juliet is described as either the sweetest cherry or a close second to Crimson Passion over ten years of observation. | 0.97 |
| 2 | description_snippet | Juliet varies from 18 to 24 degrees Brix, with lower values in wet years and higher values in drought years. | 0.98 |
| 2 | description_snippet | Juliet is usually about 4 degrees Brix higher than Carmine Jewel. | 0.96 |
| 2 | description_snippet | Longer ripening is presented as part of the reason Juliet can build more sugars, and cooler late-summer nights are said to help sugar accumulation. | 0.9 |
| 2 | flavor_profile | When fruits dehydrate and look like raisins, they are described as even sweeter. | 0.92 |
| 2 | flavor_profile | Juliet has often been called the best flavoured cherry by visitors when eaten right off the tree. | 0.96 |
| 2 | flavor_profile | The author personally rates Juliet close behind Crimson Passion for fresh eating. | 0.87 |
| 2 | culinary_use | The page states that taste comparisons of processed cherry products had not been done. | 0.94 |
| 2 | culinary_use | Some growers suggested Juliet might be too sweet for processing, but two master gardeners considered it rather tart and said it would be fine for processing. | 0.95 |
| 2 | growth_habit | Juliet's bush is described as sturdier than Carmine Jewel. | 0.9 |
| 2 | recommendation_context | Juliet may need pruning in future years to remain adapted for mechanization. | 0.9 |
| 2 | productivity | Amechanical harvester named Joanna harvested Juliet nicely. | 0.94 |
| 2 | anecdote_snippet | The page remarks that all of the cherries continue to increase in sugar levels the longer they are left on the bush. | 0.89 |
| 3 | caption_context | Juliet bushes are shown in their fifth year with technician Pete Reimer at the University of Saskatchewan. | 0.99 |
| 3 | entry_location | Aphotographed Juliet planting is located at the University of Saskatchewan. | 0.98 |
| 3 | growth_habit | The fifth-year Juliet plants are depicted as multi-stemmed bushes in an orchard or trial planting. | 0.86 |
| 3 | caption_context | Six-year-old Juliet bushes are shown at Bruno, Saskatchewan; the fruit is unripe, making it easy to see in the picture. | 0.99 |
| 3 | entry_location | Asix-year-old Juliet bush planting is documented at Bruno, Saskatchewan. | 0.99 |
| 3 | description_snippet | The page visually documents Juliet bushes carrying visible unripe fruit in a Saskatchewan field planting. | 0.9 |
Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Juliet (ID 312) within document 108. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.
Citation focus: cultivar focus: Juliet (ID 312) | page focus: 1 (auto)
Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.
| Page | Type | Quote | Claim | Entity | Jump |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | description_snippet | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | Juliet was sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | selection_origin_reference | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | Juliet was originally released under breeding number 7-21-32.0. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | anecdote_snippet | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | One propagator temporarily and unauthorizedly called Juliet 'Bob'. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | release_year_reference | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | Juliet was released in 2004. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | taxon_context | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | Juliet is part of the Romance Series. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | productivity | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | In the 2004 planting of Romance cherries and Carmine Jewel, most trees began fruiting in 2008; by 2009 Juliet had similar yields to Valentin | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | entry_hardiness_observation | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | The winter of 2008/2009 caused no damage to Juliet bushes. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 1 | caption_context | ‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0 | Figure 1 shows Juliet flowers. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | fruit_size | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Juliet is described as having optimum fruit size, defined here as the largest fruit size that can easily fit into a commercial cherry pitter | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | fruit_color | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Juliet fruit color is described as a deep burgundy red, though not as intense as Carmine Jewel. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | flavor_profile | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Juliet is described as either the sweetest cherry or a close second to Crimson Passion over ten years of observation. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | description_snippet | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Juliet varies from 18 to 24 degrees Brix, with lower values in wet years and higher values in drought years. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | culinary_use | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | The page states that taste comparisons of processed cherry products had not been done. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | growth_habit | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Juliet's bush is described as sturdier than Carmine Jewel. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | recommendation_context | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Juliet may need pruning in future years to remain adapted for mechanization. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | productivity | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | Amechanical harvester named Joanna harvested Juliet nicely. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 2 | anecdote_snippet | It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality. | The page remarks that all of the cherries continue to increase in sugar levels the longer they are left on the bush. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 3 | caption_context | Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK. | Juliet bushes are shown in their fifth year with technician Pete Reimer at the University of Saskatchewan. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 3 | entry_location | Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK. | Aphotographed Juliet planting is located at the University of Saskatchewan. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 3 | growth_habit | Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK. | The fifth-year Juliet plants are depicted as multi-stemmed bushes in an orchard or trial planting. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
| 3 | description_snippet | Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK. | The page visually documents Juliet bushes carrying visible unripe fruit in a Saskatchewan field planting. | cultivar 312 | Open Review parse |
Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.
| ID | Cultivar | Evidence / Claims | Relationships | History / Pages | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 312 | Juliet | 34 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 308 | Carmine Jewel | 6 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 310 | Romeo | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 311 | Crimson Passion | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 313 | Valentine | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 309 | Evans | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 170 | Montmorency | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 314 | Cupid | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
Relationships: 0
History events: 6
These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.
| Status | License | Holder |
|---|---|---|
| unknown |
| Tier | Score | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| tier_3 | 55 | auto | Unclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation |
| Source Lang | Target Lang | Method | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation records. | ||||
| Translation ID | Score | Risk | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation assessments. | ||||
| Status | Visibility | Reviewer | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| No publication records. | |||
| Type | Value | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| taxon_keyword | prunus | 0.65 |
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | They pointed out that when you first pop a cherry into your mouth you quickly taste the sweetness, but that if you eat several of the same variety of cherry in a row that the tartn | 0.54 |
| description_snippet | Two master gardeners who were assisting with fruit evaluations surprised me when they insisted Juliet was rather tart and they disagreed with the concept of being ‘too sweet’. | 0.54 |
| description_snippet | Some growers have suggested that Juliet might be ‘too sweet’ to be good for processing. | 0.54 |
| description_snippet | But we have not done taste comparisons between our cherries when used in processed products. | 0.54 |
| description_snippet | Personally, I like Crimson Passion the most but that’s because CP has firmness reminiscent of a sweet cherry. | 0.54 |
| productivity | Productivity | 0.56 |
| ripening_window | ripen its fruit the longer there is potential for it to | 0.56 |
| ripening_window | ripening variety like CJ | 0.56 |
| ripening_window | ripening tends to swell the | 0.56 |
| storage_duration | keep it adapted for | 0.56 |
| flavor_profile | taste the | 0.57 |
| flavor_profile | taste comparisons between | 0.57 |
| release_year_reference | 2004 | 0.68 |
| breeding_cross | usually 4o Bri x higher than Carmine Jewel but that | 0.65 |
| year_reference | 2006 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2004 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2009 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2008 | 0.55 |