Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009

Document 108

Title: Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009

Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/cherrys/Juliet-notes.pdf

Archive provenance: discovery_round_01 curated pdf import | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | source_root=https://research-groups.usask.ca | local_archive=/usr/local/var/www/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_01_second_corpus/Juliet-notes.pdf

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 71

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 1

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program

Publisher:

Site:

Year:

Page count:

Type: cultivar observation notes

Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1

Document Assessment

# Document Assessment

This document looks useful, but only parts of it appear to be strong cultivar pages. It still contains cultivar-bearing pages, but they are mostly mixed narrative pages rather than clean directory or table layouts.

The title suggests a summary or notes document rather than a formal release bulletin.

Continue focusing on the likely cultivar pages rather than spending tokens on the whole document.

Relationship Records

ID	Relation	Source	Target	Source Doc
No catalog relationships linked to this document.

History Records

ID	Type	Year	Label
756	year_reference	2004	Year reference 2004
759	release_event	2004	Release event 2004
757	year_reference	2006	Year reference 2006
754	year_reference	2008	Year reference 2008
758	cross_event	2008	usually 4o Bri x higher than Carmine Jewel but that
755	year_reference	2009	Year reference 2009

Document Reader

Select a linked cultivar to inspect the raw parsed details from this document beside the source PDF.

Citation focus: page focus: 1

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

Page	Type	Quote	Claim	Entity	Jump
1	description_snippet	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	Juliet was sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	selection_origin_reference	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	Juliet was originally released under breeding number 7-21-32.0.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	anecdote_snippet	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	One propagator temporarily and unauthorizedly called Juliet 'Bob'.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	release_year_reference	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	Juliet was released in 2004.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	taxon_context	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	Juliet is part of the Romance Series.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	productivity	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	In the 2004 planting of Romance cherries and Carmine Jewel, most trees began fruiting in 2008; by 2009 Juliet had similar yields to Valentin	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	entry_hardiness_observation	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	The winter of 2008/2009 caused no damage to Juliet bushes.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	caption_context	‘Juliet’ (sometimes erroneously spelled as Juliette) was originally released using its breeding number 7-21-32.0	Figure 1 shows Juliet flowers.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
1	productivity	while in 2009 ‘Juliet’, ‘Valentine’, and ‘Carmine Jewel’ had similar yields	In 2009 Valentine had similar yields to Juliet and Carmine Jewel and was coming close to full production.	cultivar 313	Open Review parse
1	entry_hardiness_observation	while in 2009 ‘Juliet’, ‘Valentine’, and ‘Carmine Jewel’ had similar yields	The winter of 2008/2009 caused no damage to Valentine bushes.	cultivar 313	Open Review parse
1	entry_hardiness_observation	The winter of 2008/2009 caused no damage to Juliet, Valentine and Cupid bushes.	The winter of 2008/2009 caused no damage to Cupid bushes.	cultivar 314	Open Review parse
1	entry_hardiness_observation	That winter was very bad for our Evans which had 80% dieback.	In the winter of 2008/2009, Evans had 80% dieback.	cultivar 309	Open Review parse
1	entry_hardiness_observation	injury to Crimson Passion and Romeo were around 15% dieback/ per tree.	Crimson Passion had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009.	cultivar 311	Open Review parse
2	fruit_size	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Juliet is described as having optimum fruit size, defined here as the largest fruit size that can easily fit into a commercial cherry pitter	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	fruit_color	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Juliet fruit color is described as a deep burgundy red, though not as intense as Carmine Jewel.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	flavor_profile	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Juliet is described as either the sweetest cherry or a close second to Crimson Passion over ten years of observation.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	description_snippet	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Juliet varies from 18 to 24 degrees Brix, with lower values in wet years and higher values in drought years.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	culinary_use	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	The page states that taste comparisons of processed cherry products had not been done.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	growth_habit	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Juliet's bush is described as sturdier than Carmine Jewel.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	recommendation_context	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Juliet may need pruning in future years to remain adapted for mechanization.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	productivity	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	Amechanical harvester named Joanna harvested Juliet nicely.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	anecdote_snippet	It is hard to beat Juliet for optimum fruit size and quality.	The page remarks that all of the cherries continue to increase in sugar levels the longer they are left on the bush.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
2	flavor_profile	Every year for 10 years now, Juliet is either the sweetest cherry or a close second to ‘Crimson Passion’.	Crimson Passion is presented as Juliet's main comparator for sweetness, sometimes ranking ahead of Juliet.	cultivar 311	Open Review parse
2	fruit_color	While the fruit colour is not as intense as ‘Carmine Jewel’ it is a deep burgundy red	Carmine Jewel is used as the comparator with more intense fruit color than Juliet.	cultivar 308	Open Review parse
2	description_snippet	While the fruit colour is not as intense as ‘Carmine Jewel’ it is a deep burgundy red	Juliet is described as usually about 4 degrees Brix higher than Carmine Jewel.	cultivar 308	Open Review parse
2	anecdote_snippet	While the fruit colour is not as intense as ‘Carmine Jewel’ it is a deep burgundy red	Carmine Jewel is characterized as an earlier ripening variety than Juliet.	cultivar 308	Open Review parse
2	growth_habit	While the fruit colour is not as intense as ‘Carmine Jewel’ it is a deep burgundy red	Juliet's bush is described as sturdier than Carmine Jewel.	cultivar 308	Open Review parse
2	flavor_profile	Still others feel ‘Romeo’ is the best.	Some evaluators felt Romeo was the best in flavor.	cultivar 310	Open Review parse
2	fruit_color	it is a deep burgundy red which is much more intense than ‘Montmorency’	Montmorency is used as a comparator with less intense fruit color than Juliet.	cultivar 170	Open Review parse
2	fruit_color	it is a deep burgundy red which is much more intense than ... ‘Valentine’	Valentine is used as a comparator with less intense fruit color than Juliet.	cultivar 313	Open Review parse
2	fruit_color	it is a deep burgundy red which is much more intense than ... ‘Evans’.	Evans is used as a comparator with less intense fruit color than Juliet.	cultivar 309	Open Review parse
3	caption_context	Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK.	Juliet bushes are shown in their fifth year with technician Pete Reimer at the University of Saskatchewan.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
3	entry_location	Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK.	Aphotographed Juliet planting is located at the University of Saskatchewan.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
3	growth_habit	Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK.	The fifth-year Juliet plants are depicted as multi-stemmed bushes in an orchard or trial planting.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	Figure 3. Juliet bushes in their 5th Year with technician Pete Reimer at the Uof SK.	The page visually documents Juliet bushes carrying visible unripe fruit in a Saskatchewan field planting.	cultivar 312	Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

ID	Cultivar	Evidence / Claims	Link
312	Juliet	34	Open cultivar
308	Carmine Jewel	6	Open cultivar
310	Romeo	3	Open cultivar
311	Crimson Passion	3	Open cultivar
313	Valentine	3	Open cultivar
309	Evans	2	Open cultivar
170	Montmorency	1	Open cultivar
314	Cupid	1	Open cultivar

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 0

History events: 6

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

Status	License	Holder
unknown

Credibility Records

Tier	Score	Assessor	Rationale
tier_3	55	auto	Unclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation

Translation Records

Source Lang	Target Lang	Method	Status	Note
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation ID	Score	Risk	Assessor	Rationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

Status	Visibility	Reviewer	Note
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

Type	Value	Confidence
taxon_keyword	prunus	0.65

Extracted Claims

Type	Claim	Confidence
description_snippet	They pointed out that when you first pop a cherry into your mouth you quickly taste the sweetness, but that if you eat several of the same variety of cherry in a row that the tartn	0.54
description_snippet	Two master gardeners who were assisting with fruit evaluations surprised me when they insisted Juliet was rather tart and they disagreed with the concept of being ‘too sweet’.	0.54
description_snippet	Some growers have suggested that Juliet might be ‘too sweet’ to be good for processing.	0.54
description_snippet	But we have not done taste comparisons between our cherries when used in processed products.	0.54
description_snippet	Personally, I like Crimson Passion the most but that’s because CP has firmness reminiscent of a sweet cherry.	0.54
productivity	Productivity	0.56
ripening_window	ripen its fruit the longer there is potential for it to	0.56
ripening_window	ripening variety like CJ	0.56
ripening_window	ripening tends to swell the	0.56
storage_duration	keep it adapted for	0.56
flavor_profile	taste the	0.57
flavor_profile	taste comparisons between	0.57
release_year_reference	2004	0.68
breeding_cross	usually 4o Bri x higher than Carmine Jewel but that	0.65
year_reference	2006	0.55
year_reference	2004	0.55
year_reference	2009	0.55
year_reference	2008	0.55