Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012

Document 102

Title: Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012

Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/haskap/20080042.pdf

Archive provenance: discovery_round_01 curated pdf import | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | source_root=https://research-groups.usask.ca | local_archive=/usr/local/var/www/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_01_second_corpus/20080042.pdf

Type: pdf | Language: ru | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 400

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 107

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program

Publisher:

Site:

Year: 2012

Page count:

Type: final report

Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1

Relationship Records

ID	Relation	Source	Target	Source Doc
332	mentioned_in_document	University Of Saskatchewan	Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012	102
331	cross_parent	Appendi	Viii	102
330	cross_parent	Appendi	Vii	102
329	cross_parent	Appendi	Iii	102
328	cross_parent	Japan	Japan	102
327	cross_parent	Kurile	Russia	102
326	cross_parent	Japan	Canada	102

History Records

ID	Type	Year	Label
719	year_reference	2008	Year reference 2008
720	year_reference	2009	Year reference 2009
721	year_reference	2010	Year reference 2010
722	year_reference	2011	Year reference 2011
718	year_reference	2012	Year reference 2012
723	cross_event	2012	Japan x Canada
724	cross_event	2012	Kurile x Russia
725	cross_event	2012	Japan x Japan
726	cross_event	2012	Appendi x III
727	cross_event	2012	Appendi x VII
728	cross_event	2012	Appendi x VIII
729	institution_mention	2012	University Of Saskatchewan

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

177 additional parsed names from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Parsed Cultivar Detail

Cultivar: Borealis

Pages in document: p5 p6 p45 p52 p54 p56 p57 p58 p60 p61 p62 p63 p64 p71 p72 p74 p75 p76 p77 p79 p98 p106 p107 p110 p115 p117 p122 p133

Entry Snippets

Page	Basis	Snippet
5	explicit_cultivar_reference	Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010.
6	explicit_cultivar_reference	Table 23. Dimensions and mass of haskap berries from 2010 advanced selections. 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.
45	explicit_cultivar_reference	Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program.
52	explicit_cultivar_reference	Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well.
54	explicit_cultivar_reference	In the spring of 2010 all of the six selections were observed to see if bloom would occur at the same time as ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’.
56	explicit_cultivar_reference	The original plant of ‘Honey Bee’ is at least 50% taller than the ‘Borealis’ plants in the same row.
57	explicit_cultivar_reference	‘Honey Bee’ was the best choice because it alone bloomed at the right time and gave good fruit set when crossed to ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’.
58	explicit_cultivar_reference	perhaps ‘Honey Bee’ might be considered just as desirable and both would could be called “companion varieties.”
60	explicit_cultivar_reference	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time and so could be used as a control in that field to aid in comparison.
61	explicit_cultivar_reference	‘Borealis’ is the fourth berry in the 2nd row. But the ‘Borealis’ bushes are growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings. We have seen much larger ‘Borealis’ berries on the older original plant
62	explicit_cultivar_reference	BOREALIS 16.8 12.1 10.7 1.4
63	explicit_cultivar_reference	BOREALIS 5 3 3 4 5 1 3.5
64	explicit_cultivar_reference	BOREALIS 11.4 3.39 2.42
71	explicit_cultivar_reference	Borealis 1.607 12.0 1.93 4 3 5 3 3.75
72	explicit_cultivar_reference	The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'.
74	explicit_cultivar_reference	Firstly, two year old Borealis plants were placed in a cooler for two months and were brought out of the cooler at three different times so that testing could be done on new leaves as well as mature leaves.
75	explicit_cultivar_reference	Table 28. ANOVA for various treatments against mildew in the greenhouse for 'Borealis' haskap plants.
76	explicit_cultivar_reference	Table 30. Progression of mildew infection for all treatments under greenhouse conditions for 'Borealis' Haskap.
77	explicit_cultivar_reference	Table 31. Interaction of treatments and age of plants on % mildew infection in greenhouse grown 'Borealis' haskap plants.
79	explicit_cultivar_reference	the fruit of 4 important breeding parents and out ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties
98	explicit_cultivar_reference	The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’).
106	introduction_sentence	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.
107	explicit_cultivar_reference	In a sample of berries from 43 accessions sent to Dr. Ukai of the University of Hokkaido, 'Borealis' was selected as the best tasting.
110	explicit_cultivar_reference	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+
115	explicit_cultivar_reference	There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties.
117	explicit_cultivar_reference	Figure 1- Left: ‘Borealis’ a cultivar for the home gardener.
122	explicit_cultivar_reference	Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best
133	explicit_cultivar_reference	This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected.

Raw Parsed Claims

Page	Type	Claim	Confidence
5	description_snippet	Referenced as one of the program's named varieties used in crosses with various hybrids and Japanese germplasm in 2010.	0.95
5	recommendation_context	Table 22 concerns observations and tests to determine a pollinator variety for 'Tundra' and 'Borealis'.	0.96
5	caption_context	Mentioned in the List of Tables as the subject of Tables 16 and 22.	0.97
6	fruit_size	Atable title states that 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	0.97
6	caption_context	Multiple listed tables concern mildew treatments and mildew progression for 'Borealis' haskap under greenhouse conditions.	0.96
6	description_snippet	Referenced in table listings for berry dimensions, mass, and greenhouse mildew experiments.	0.91
45	description_snippet	Borealis is identified as one of the program's existing best cultivars.	0.99
45	recommendation_context	Many crosses involving Borealis were done to verify possible pollinators and to incorporate worthwhile traits.	0.95
45	description_snippet	Haskap requires crosspollination between 2 compatible varieties in order to get fruit set; Borealis is treated within that pollination-testing context on this page.	0.9
45	source_reference_abbreviation	Table 16 lists 2010 crosses involving Borealis with various hybrids, Japanese germplasm, Tundra, Hamish, and Indigo Gem.	0.98
52	recommendation_context	Borealis is one of the program's currently released varieties.	0.94
52	entry_pedigree	Borealis is described as too closely related to Tundra and the Indigo series, identified here as full sibs.	0.9
52	description_snippet	Borealis does not pollinate Tundra and the Indigo series very well because of close relatedness.	0.95
54	recommendation_context	‘Borealis’ was used as a bloom-time and pollen-compatibility comparison cultivar in pollinator selection testing.	0.96
54	description_snippet	One propagation company reportedly found 6-24-18 to propagate faster than ‘Borealis’.	0.92
56	growth_habit	Borealis plants in the same row are at least 50% shorter than the original Honey Bee plant.	0.9
56	caption_context	Borealis is included in the leaf comparison figure alongside Tundra, Indigo Gem, and Honey Bee.	0.93
57	recommendation_context	Honey Bee gave good fruit set when crossed to Borealis.	0.97
57	entry_pedigree	The Indigo series are described as siblings of Borealis and Tundra.	0.79
58	recommendation_context	In a homeowner planting with ‘Borealis,’ ‘Honey Bee’ is suggested as a companion variety rather than an inferior pollinator-only type.	0.95
58	recommendation_context	‘Honey Bee’ and ‘Borealis’ both need each other to set fruit.	0.92
58	recommendation_context	One ‘Honey Bee’ could provide pollen for 4 to 8 ‘Borealis’ plants if planted in close proximity.	0.94
58	recommendation_context	In a gardening situation, ‘Honey Bee’ should be put on the north side of ‘Borealis’ or far enough away that it will not crowd it or reduce the sunshine.	0.95
60	recommendation_context	‘Borealis’ was used as a control cultivar in Block 6 to aid comparison with new selections in 2010.	0.95
60	productivity	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time in 2010.	0.87
60	fruit_size	‘Borealis’ had smaller fruit than most seedlings in this field at that stage.	0.89
60	growth_habit	The ‘Borealis’ plants were smaller and less vigorous than most seedlings in Block 6.	0.91
60	description_snippet	The report notes that Borealis fruit will likely get larger as the bushes get bigger, so the observed smaller fruit may reflect plant age and size rather than final potential.	0.9
61	caption_context	In Figure 21, Borealis is identified as the fourth berry in the second row among superior Block 6 selections.	0.98
61	growth_habit	Borealis bushes were growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings.	0.96
61	fruit_size	Much larger Borealis berries had been seen on the older original plant, and the author expected berries from this field to become larger as the bushes approached full size.	0.93
61	description_snippet	Borealis is used here as a comparison cultivar against newer advanced selections.	0.88
62	fruit_size	Table 23 reports Borealis berry dimensions as 16.8 mm length, 12.1 mm width, and 10.7 mm depth, with berry weight 1.4 grams.	0.99
62	description_snippet	The table subtitle states that 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	0.97
63	recommendation_context	Borealis had been the program's standard for excellent flavour in this table.	0.98
63	flavor_profile	Fruit quality ratings: texture 5, bloom 3, sweetness 3, sour 4, bitterness 5, aroma 1, average 3.5.	0.99
64	description_snippet	Table 25 lists Borealis with soluble solids of 11.4 brix, pH 3.39, and total acidity of 2.42% citric acid.	0.99
71	fruit_size	Berry weight is listed as 1.607 g.	0.99
71	description_snippet	Brix 12.0, acid 1.93, sweet 4, sour 3, bitter 5, aroma 3, overall taste 3.75.	0.99
71	recommendation_context	This named cultivar appears in the comparison cultivar section at the bottom of the table.	0.98
72	entry_pedigree	The Indigo series varieties are full siblings of Borealis and Tundra.	0.95
72	recommendation_context	The Indigo plants were considered runner-ups to Borealis and Tundra.	0.91
72	description_snippet	Experimental Indigo varieties were released in case Borealis and Tundra proved hard to propagate or had field difficulties.	0.9
74	description_snippet	Two-year-old Borealis plants were used in the greenhouse mildew-prevention experiment.	0.97
74	recommendation_context	Borealis plants were placed in a cooler for two months and then removed at staggered times so testing could compare new leaves and mature leaves.	0.92
74	anecdote_snippet	Plants were transplanted into one-litre pots and used to evaluate how much UV-Cradiation leaves could tolerate before damage occurred.	0.9
75	taxon_context	'Borealis' is discussed here as a haskap cultivar in a greenhouse mildew-control experiment.	0.97
75	description_snippet	Various treatments against mildew were evaluated in the greenhouse for 'Borealis' haskap plants.	0.95
75	recommendation_context	For 'Borealis' haskap plants, all treatments were significantly better than the control in reducing mildew infection.	0.9
75	description_snippet	Sulphur gave the lowest mean infection, but was statistically similar to milk, F-mix, and garlic treatments.	0.9
75	description_snippet	Older plants had more than three times the infection rate of younger plants, averaging 6.5% compared to 1.9% over the three observation dates.	0.88
76	taxon_context	Borealis is discussed here as a haskap cultivar in a greenhouse mildew-infection experiment.	0.95
76	description_snippet	For all treatments combined, mildew infection progressed from 2.4% on Dec-13 to 4.5% on Dec-20 and 5.6% on Jan-10 under greenhouse conditions.	0.93
76	description_snippet	Mean infection by treatment was reported as Control 9.9, UV-C 4.9, Milk 3.7, F-Mix 3.5, Garlic 2.1, and Sulfur 1.2, with letter groupings indicating statistical overlap.	0.89
76	anecdote_snippet	The text states mildew was initially difficult to establish in the greenhouse, but once established it nearly doubled within the first week and growers should treat symptoms immediately when they appear.	0.86
77	caption_context	Table 31 reports the interaction of treatment and plant age on percent mildew infection in greenhouse-grown 'Borealis' haskap plants.	0.96
77	description_snippet	In the table, the highest reported mean infection is for Control + old plants at 19.8, while Garlic + young and Control + young are both reported at 0.0.	0.91
77	recommendation_context	The cultivar is used here as the greenhouse test subject for comparing mildew infection outcomes across treatments and plant ages.	0.88
79	description_snippet	James Dawson's thesis work tracked production of six healthy compounds through the growing season in leaves and fruit, including the variety Borealis.	0.93
79	taxon_context	Borealis is referenced here as a haskap variety within the University of Saskatchewan program context.	0.9
98	entry_pedigree	Borealis is identified as a sister to the Indigo series varieties within the same closely related family group.	0.95
98	selection_origin_reference	Borealis had breeding ID 9-94.	0.99
98	description_snippet	All five Row 9-related varieties discussed here are closely related and share the same mother and father.	0.88
98	keeping_quality	In sorting-line durability tests, Borealis was rated the most fragile fruit among the compared varieties.	0.97
98	caption_context	Borealis was compared against Tundra and the Indigo varieties in hand-harvest and sorting-line durability testing.	0.94
106	release_year_reference	One of two varieties named and released in 2007.	0.98
106	entry_pedigree	From the cross Kiev#8 x Tomichka.	0.98
106	recommendation_context	Recommended for home gardeners.	0.97
106	fruit_size	Described as having the largest fruit among the varieties being discussed.	0.95
106	flavor_profile	Described as having the best flavour among the varieties being discussed.	0.95
106	description_snippet	Too fragile for mechanization.	0.96
107	flavor_profile	Borealis was selected as the best tasting in a sample of berries from 43 accessions sent to Dr. Ukai of the University of Hokkaido.	0.99
107	anecdote_snippet	Berries of this family brought to Hokkaido by Dr. Bors in 2008 received very favourable comments on flavour.	0.82
107	recommendation_context	The best seedlings from the Kiev #8 x Tomichka row were selected and released as new varieties after growers pressed for their release.	0.73
110	release_year_reference	Listed in a table of University of Saskatchewan cultivars released in 2007.	0.98
110	fruit_size	Fruit weight is 1.62 g.	0.99
110	description_snippet	Fruit shape is short flat boxy.	0.98
110	flavor_profile	Flavour is sweet tart.	0.98
110	keeping_quality	Integrity rating is c+ based on berry condition after conditions mimicking mechanized harvesting and sorting.	0.99
110	breeder_reference	Presented as a University of Saskatchewan cultivar.	0.96
115	flavor_profile	Only a few new plants had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than Borealis.	0.94
115	growth_habit	Seedlings in the newer breeding field were estimated to be growing about 50% faster or more than Borealis planted in the same field, though this was stated as an informal estimate rather than a controlled comparison.	0.79
115	recommendation_context	Afuture pollinator selection is being considered for release because it would bloom at the same time as Borealis and have compatible pollen.	0.94
115	recommendation_context	If the new pollinator proves superior to Tundra, growers may wish to plant it in larger numbers and use Borealis and Tundra as pollinators.	0.88
115	description_snippet	Avalid comparison would require vegetatively propagating Borealis and favorite new selections at the same time so plants were similar in size when planted.	0.87
117	caption_context	Figure 1 identifies ‘Borealis’ as a cultivar for the home gardener.	0.97
122	fruit_size	Borealis is described as having big fat berries.	0.95
122	keeping_quality	In the unharvested-row observation, Borealis was among the selections whose fruit quality held up best over time on the plant.	0.9
122	description_snippet	Selections that had big fat berries were the best in late holding quality comparisons.	0.83
133	selection_origin_reference	The row shown in Figure 32 is identified as the row from which the variety Borealis was selected.	0.95
133	caption_context	Figure 32 states that haskap bushes have branches close to the ground and that the pictured row was the source of selection for Borealis.	0.95

Inherited Context

p5: Lonicera caerulea | haskap | breeding crosses | Japanese germplasm | Russian cultivars | Canadian germplasm | Front matter | List of Tables | University of Saskatchewan | University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan hask
p6: haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Kurile hybrids | List of Tables | List of Figures | University of Saskatchewan | U of S Fruit Program | haskap breeding | advanced selections | wild germplasm use | fruit breeding | Saskatchewan | Saskatoon | Canada | Newfoundland | Japan
p45: Lonicera caerulea | haskap | hybrid selections | Japanese germplasm | Kurile germplasm | Russian germplasm | Crosses with Borealis and Tundra | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding program | 2010 crossing prog
p52: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | released Haskap cultivars | Indigo series | Germplasm Evaluation | 2009 & 2010: The search for a quality pollinator | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan Haskap breeding program | Saskatchewan
p54: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Blue honeysuckle | Haskap cultivars | Haskap breeding selections | Blue honeysuckle cultivars | Pollinator selection and compatibility testing | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breedin
p56: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | University of Saskatchewan haskap cultivars | Pollinator and cultivar evaluation | Honey Bee | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding and production program | Saskatchewan | Russia |
p57: Haskap | Honeyberry | Blue honeysuckle | Lonicera caerulea | University of Saskatchewan haskap cultivars | Russian and Kuril Islands-derived haskap breeding material | Honey Bee | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap b
p58: Haskap | Honeyberry | Blue honeysuckle | Lonicera caerulea | home garden companion cultivars | Haskap cultivars and pollinator selections | Pollinator and companion cultivar discussion | 'Honey Bee' management and use | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fu
p60: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Haskap breeding selections | 2010 Selections | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | Haskap berry breeding and production program | Block-based field seedling evaluation and selection | Saskatchewan | Canada
p61: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | advanced selections comparison standard | Russian Haskap evaluation context | 2010 Selections | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding program | evaluation of advanced selections for
p62: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | 2010 advanced selections comparison set | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding selections | Advanced selections fruit analysis | Table 23 | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breedi
p63: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Honeyberry | 2010 advanced haskap selections | Haskap breeding selections | Advanced selections evaluation | Fruit quality attributes | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding and eva
p64: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | advanced breeding selections | haskap breeding selections | 2010 advanced selections | chemical analysis | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding program | advanced selection evaluat
p71: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Released haskap cultivars used for comparison | Haskap breeding selections and cultivars | Table 27. Lab assessments of frozen fruit from 2011 selections | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan has
p72: Lonicera caerulea | haskap | University of Saskatchewan haskap cultivars | Naming of the 'Indigo' Series | Additional breeding information | University of Saskatchewan | Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Ministry of Agriculture | All-Russian Horticultural Michurin I
p74: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding material | Haskap breeding germplasm | haskap subspecies hybrids | Haskap Production Research and Observations | Mildew Prevention in the Greenhouse | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development
p75: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Greenhouse-grown haskap plants under mildew-control study | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding and production material | Haskap Production Research and Observations | Mildew Prevention in the Greenhouse | University of Saskatchewan | Agri
p76: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | University of Saskatchewan haskap cultivar material | Haskap breeding material and cultivars | Greenhouse mildew control experiment | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding and produ
p77: Haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Greenhouse mildew treatment results | Production Articles | University of Saskatchewan | Agriculture Development Fund | Haskap berry breeding and production follow-up project | Saskatchewan | Canada
p79: haskap | Lonicera caerulea | Haskap Wine and Liqueur | Nutraceutical Research on Haskap | University of Saskatchewan fruit program | Agriculture Development Fund | Haskap Canada | University of Saskatchewan haskap breeding and production program | advanced selections list |

Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Borealis (ID 1888) within document 102. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.

Citation focus: cultivar focus: Borealis (ID 1888) | page focus: 107 | quote focus: This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected.

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

Page	Type	Quote	Claim	Entity	Jump
5	description_snippet	Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010.	Referenced as one of the program's named varieties used in crosses with various hybrids and Japanese germplasm in 2010.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
5	recommendation_context	Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010.	Table 22 concerns observations and tests to determine a pollinator variety for 'Tundra' and 'Borealis'.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
5	caption_context	Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010.	Mentioned in the List of Tables as the subject of Tables 16 and 22.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
6	fruit_size	Table 23. Dimensions and mass of haskap berries from 2010 advanced selections. 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	Atable title states that 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
6	caption_context	Table 23. Dimensions and mass of haskap berries from 2010 advanced selections. 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	Multiple listed tables concern mildew treatments and mildew progression for 'Borealis' haskap under greenhouse conditions.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	Table 23. Dimensions and mass of haskap berries from 2010 advanced selections. 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	Referenced in table listings for berry dimensions, mass, and greenhouse mildew experiments.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
45	description_snippet	Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program.	Borealis is identified as one of the program's existing best cultivars.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
45	recommendation_context	Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program.	Many crosses involving Borealis were done to verify possible pollinators and to incorporate worthwhile traits.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
45	source_reference_abbreviation	Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program.	Table 16 lists 2010 crosses involving Borealis with various hybrids, Japanese germplasm, Tundra, Hamish, and Indigo Gem.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
52	recommendation_context	Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well.	Borealis is one of the program's currently released varieties.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
52	entry_pedigree	Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well.	Borealis is described as too closely related to Tundra and the Indigo series, identified here as full sibs.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
52	description_snippet	Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well.	Borealis does not pollinate Tundra and the Indigo series very well because of close relatedness.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
54	recommendation_context	In the spring of 2010 all of the six selections were observed to see if bloom would occur at the same time as ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’.	‘Borealis’ was used as a bloom-time and pollen-compatibility comparison cultivar in pollinator selection testing.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
54	description_snippet	In the spring of 2010 all of the six selections were observed to see if bloom would occur at the same time as ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’.	One propagation company reportedly found 6-24-18 to propagate faster than ‘Borealis’.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
56	growth_habit	The original plant of ‘Honey Bee’ is at least 50% taller than the ‘Borealis’ plants in the same row.	Borealis plants in the same row are at least 50% shorter than the original Honey Bee plant.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
56	caption_context	The original plant of ‘Honey Bee’ is at least 50% taller than the ‘Borealis’ plants in the same row.	Borealis is included in the leaf comparison figure alongside Tundra, Indigo Gem, and Honey Bee.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
57	recommendation_context	‘Honey Bee’ was the best choice because it alone bloomed at the right time and gave good fruit set when crossed to ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’.	Honey Bee gave good fruit set when crossed to Borealis.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
57	entry_pedigree	‘Honey Bee’ was the best choice because it alone bloomed at the right time and gave good fruit set when crossed to ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’.	The Indigo series are described as siblings of Borealis and Tundra.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
58	recommendation_context	perhaps ‘Honey Bee’ might be considered just as desirable and both would could be called “companion varieties.”	In a homeowner planting with ‘Borealis,’ ‘Honey Bee’ is suggested as a companion variety rather than an inferior pollinator-only type.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
60	recommendation_context	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time and so could be used as a control in that field to aid in comparison.	‘Borealis’ was used as a control cultivar in Block 6 to aid comparison with new selections in 2010.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
60	productivity	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time and so could be used as a control in that field to aid in comparison.	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time in 2010.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
60	fruit_size	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time and so could be used as a control in that field to aid in comparison.	‘Borealis’ had smaller fruit than most seedlings in this field at that stage.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
60	growth_habit	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time and so could be used as a control in that field to aid in comparison.	The ‘Borealis’ plants were smaller and less vigorous than most seedlings in Block 6.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
60	description_snippet	The ‘Borealis’ plants in Block 6 began to fruit for the first time and so could be used as a control in that field to aid in comparison.	The report notes that Borealis fruit will likely get larger as the bushes get bigger, so the observed smaller fruit may reflect plant age an	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
61	caption_context	‘Borealis’ is the fourth berry in the 2nd row. But the ‘Borealis’ bushes are growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings. We have seen much larger ‘Borealis’ berries on the older original plant	In Figure 21, Borealis is identified as the fourth berry in the second row among superior Block 6 selections.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
61	growth_habit	‘Borealis’ is the fourth berry in the 2nd row. But the ‘Borealis’ bushes are growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings. We have seen much larger ‘Borealis’ berries on the older original plant	Borealis bushes were growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
61	fruit_size	‘Borealis’ is the fourth berry in the 2nd row. But the ‘Borealis’ bushes are growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings. We have seen much larger ‘Borealis’ berries on the older original plant	Much larger Borealis berries had been seen on the older original plant, and the author expected berries from this field to become larger as	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
61	description_snippet	‘Borealis’ is the fourth berry in the 2nd row. But the ‘Borealis’ bushes are growing at a much slower rate than the newer seedlings. We have seen much larger ‘Borealis’ berries on the older original plant	Borealis is used here as a comparison cultivar against newer advanced selections.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
62	fruit_size	BOREALIS 16.8 12.1 10.7 1.4	Table 23 reports Borealis berry dimensions as 16.8 mm length, 12.1 mm width, and 10.7 mm depth, with berry weight 1.4 grams.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
62	description_snippet	BOREALIS 16.8 12.1 10.7 1.4	The table subtitle states that 'Borealis' fruit had been the largest of a previous generation.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
63	recommendation_context	BOREALIS 5 3 3 4 5 1 3.5	Borealis had been the program's standard for excellent flavour in this table.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
63	flavor_profile	BOREALIS 5 3 3 4 5 1 3.5	Fruit quality ratings: texture 5, bloom 3, sweetness 3, sour 4, bitterness 5, aroma 1, average 3.5.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
64	description_snippet	BOREALIS 11.4 3.39 2.42	Table 25 lists Borealis with soluble solids of 11.4 brix, pH 3.39, and total acidity of 2.42% citric acid.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
71	fruit_size	Borealis 1.607 12.0 1.93 4 3 5 3 3.75	Berry weight is listed as 1.607 g.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
71	description_snippet	Borealis 1.607 12.0 1.93 4 3 5 3 3.75	Brix 12.0, acid 1.93, sweet 4, sour 3, bitter 5, aroma 3, overall taste 3.75.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
71	recommendation_context	Borealis 1.607 12.0 1.93 4 3 5 3 3.75	This named cultivar appears in the comparison cultivar section at the bottom of the table.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
72	entry_pedigree	The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'.	The Indigo series varieties are full siblings of Borealis and Tundra.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
72	recommendation_context	The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'.	The Indigo plants were considered runner-ups to Borealis and Tundra.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
72	description_snippet	The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'.	Experimental Indigo varieties were released in case Borealis and Tundra proved hard to propagate or had field difficulties.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
74	description_snippet	Firstly, two year old Borealis plants were placed in a cooler for two months and were brought out of the cooler at three different times so that testing could be done on new leaves as well as mature leaves.	Two-year-old Borealis plants were used in the greenhouse mildew-prevention experiment.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
74	recommendation_context	Firstly, two year old Borealis plants were placed in a cooler for two months and were brought out of the cooler at three different times so that testing could be done on new leaves as well as mature leaves.	Borealis plants were placed in a cooler for two months and then removed at staggered times so testing could compare new leaves and mature le	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
74	anecdote_snippet	Firstly, two year old Borealis plants were placed in a cooler for two months and were brought out of the cooler at three different times so that testing could be done on new leaves as well as mature leaves.	Plants were transplanted into one-litre pots and used to evaluate how much UV-Cradiation leaves could tolerate before damage occurred.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
75	taxon_context	Table 28. ANOVA for various treatments against mildew in the greenhouse for 'Borealis' haskap plants.	'Borealis' is discussed here as a haskap cultivar in a greenhouse mildew-control experiment.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
75	description_snippet	Table 28. ANOVA for various treatments against mildew in the greenhouse for 'Borealis' haskap plants.	Various treatments against mildew were evaluated in the greenhouse for 'Borealis' haskap plants.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
75	recommendation_context	Table 28. ANOVA for various treatments against mildew in the greenhouse for 'Borealis' haskap plants.	For 'Borealis' haskap plants, all treatments were significantly better than the control in reducing mildew infection.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
76	taxon_context	Table 30. Progression of mildew infection for all treatments under greenhouse conditions for 'Borealis' Haskap.	Borealis is discussed here as a haskap cultivar in a greenhouse mildew-infection experiment.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
76	description_snippet	Table 30. Progression of mildew infection for all treatments under greenhouse conditions for 'Borealis' Haskap.	For all treatments combined, mildew infection progressed from 2.4% on Dec-13 to 4.5% on Dec-20 and 5.6% on Jan-10 under greenhouse condition	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
76	anecdote_snippet	Table 30. Progression of mildew infection for all treatments under greenhouse conditions for 'Borealis' Haskap.	The text states mildew was initially difficult to establish in the greenhouse, but once established it nearly doubled within the first week	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
77	caption_context	Table 31. Interaction of treatments and age of plants on % mildew infection in greenhouse grown 'Borealis' haskap plants.	Table 31 reports the interaction of treatment and plant age on percent mildew infection in greenhouse-grown 'Borealis' haskap plants.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
77	description_snippet	Table 31. Interaction of treatments and age of plants on % mildew infection in greenhouse grown 'Borealis' haskap plants.	In the table, the highest reported mean infection is for Control + old plants at 19.8, while Garlic + young and Control + young are both rep	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
77	recommendation_context	Table 31. Interaction of treatments and age of plants on % mildew infection in greenhouse grown 'Borealis' haskap plants.	The cultivar is used here as the greenhouse test subject for comparing mildew infection outcomes across treatments and plant ages.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
79	description_snippet	the fruit of 4 important breeding parents and out ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties	James Dawson's thesis work tracked production of six healthy compounds through the growing season in leaves and fruit, including the variety	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
79	taxon_context	the fruit of 4 important breeding parents and out ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties	Borealis is referenced here as a haskap variety within the University of Saskatchewan program context.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
98	entry_pedigree	The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’).	Borealis is identified as a sister to the Indigo series varieties within the same closely related family group.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
98	selection_origin_reference	The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’).	Borealis had breeding ID 9-94.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
98	description_snippet	The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’).	All five Row 9-related varieties discussed here are closely related and share the same mother and father.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
98	keeping_quality	The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’).	In sorting-line durability tests, Borealis was rated the most fragile fruit among the compared varieties.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
98	caption_context	The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’).	Borealis was compared against Tundra and the Indigo varieties in hand-harvest and sorting-line durability testing.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
106	release_year_reference	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.	One of two varieties named and released in 2007.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
106	entry_pedigree	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.	From the cross Kiev#8 x Tomichka.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
106	recommendation_context	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.	Recommended for home gardeners.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
106	fruit_size	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.	Described as having the largest fruit among the varieties being discussed.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
106	flavor_profile	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.	Described as having the best flavour among the varieties being discussed.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
106	description_snippet	The variety 'Borealis' is recommended for the home gardeners. It had the largest fruit and best flavour but is too fragile for mechanization.	Too fragile for mechanization.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
107	flavor_profile	In a sample of berries from 43 accessions sent to Dr. Ukai of the University of Hokkaido, 'Borealis' was selected as the best tasting.	Borealis was selected as the best tasting in a sample of berries from 43 accessions sent to Dr. Ukai of the University of Hokkaido.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
107	anecdote_snippet	In a sample of berries from 43 accessions sent to Dr. Ukai of the University of Hokkaido, 'Borealis' was selected as the best tasting.	Berries of this family brought to Hokkaido by Dr. Bors in 2008 received very favourable comments on flavour.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
107	recommendation_context	In a sample of berries from 43 accessions sent to Dr. Ukai of the University of Hokkaido, 'Borealis' was selected as the best tasting.	The best seedlings from the Kiev #8 x Tomichka row were selected and released as new varieties after growers pressed for their release.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
110	release_year_reference	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+	Listed in a table of University of Saskatchewan cultivars released in 2007.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
110	fruit_size	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+	Fruit weight is 1.62 g.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
110	description_snippet	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+	Fruit shape is short flat boxy.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
110	flavor_profile	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+	Flavour is sweet tart.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
110	keeping_quality	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+	Integrity rating is c+ based on berry condition after conditions mimicking mechanized harvesting and sorting.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
110	breeder_reference	Borealis Wet 1.62 short flat boxy sweet tart c+	Presented as a University of Saskatchewan cultivar.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
115	flavor_profile	There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties.	Only a few new plants had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than Borealis.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
115	growth_habit	There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties.	Seedlings in the newer breeding field were estimated to be growing about 50% faster or more than Borealis planted in the same field, though	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
115	recommendation_context	There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties.	Afuture pollinator selection is being considered for release because it would bloom at the same time as Borealis and have compatible pollen.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
115	description_snippet	There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties.	Avalid comparison would require vegetatively propagating Borealis and favorite new selections at the same time so plants were similar in siz	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
117	caption_context	Figure 1- Left: ‘Borealis’ a cultivar for the home gardener.	Figure 1 identifies ‘Borealis’ as a cultivar for the home gardener.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
122	fruit_size	Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best	Borealis is described as having big fat berries.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
122	keeping_quality	Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best	In the unharvested-row observation, Borealis was among the selections whose fruit quality held up best over time on the plant.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
122	description_snippet	Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best	Selections that had big fat berries were the best in late holding quality comparisons.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
133	selection_origin_reference	This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected.	The row shown in Figure 32 is identified as the row from which the variety Borealis was selected.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse
133	caption_context	This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected.	Figure 32 states that haskap bushes have branches close to the ground and that the pictured row was the source of selection for Borealis.	cultivar 1888	Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

ID	Cultivar	Evidence / Claims	Relationships	History / Pages	Link
1888	Borealis	91	0	0	Open cultivar
1893	Honey Bee	83	0	0	Open cultivar
1889	Tundra	64	0	0	Open cultivar
1891	Berry Blue	41	0	0	Open cultivar
1894	Indigo Gem	17	0	0	Open cultivar
1941	Jri9-6	15	0	0	Open cultivar
1895	Indigo Yum	14	0	0	Open cultivar
2045	Bti	11	0	0	Open cultivar
1916	Czech#17 (Berry Blue)	10	0	0	Open cultivar
268	Appendi	3	3	3	Open cultivar
1912	Gz3	9	0	0	Open cultivar
1918	Yukon Family	9	0	0	Open cultivar
264	Japan	2	3	3	Open cultivar
1917	Row 11 Vigour	8	0	0	Open cultivar
1919	Magadon (C10)	7	0	0	Open cultivar
2046	Suvenir	7	0	0	Open cultivar
2052	Indigo Treat	7	0	0	Open cultivar
308	Carmine Jewel	6	0	0	Open cultivar
1911	Gzo	6	0	0	Open cultivar
2053	Bugnet	6	0	0	Open cultivar
1896	Pervenec	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1897	Gulik	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1900	Morena	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1910	Cio	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1938	Jri9-2	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1939	Jri9-3	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1974	J3 Series	5	0	0	Open cultivar
2044	Indigo Series	5	0	0	Open cultivar
2054	Lebedushka	5	0	0	Open cultivar
2055	Pushkinskaya	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1890	Blue Belle	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1898	Kamchadalka	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1899	Erakingra	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1913	Yukon	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1920	Blue Velvet	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1921	Yukon Series	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1929	Sk	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1935	Mb	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1940	Jri9-7	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1942	Jri9-4	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1943	Jr9-3	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1944	Jrz7-1	4	0	0	Open cultivar
2057	Tomichka	4	0	0	Open cultivar
265	Canada	1	1	1	Open cultivar
266	Kurile	1	1	1	Open cultivar
267	Russia	1	1	1	Open cultivar
269	Iii	1	1	1	Open cultivar
270	Vii	1	1	1	Open cultivar
271	Viii	1	1	1	Open cultivar
1901	Regel Iz Chuguevki	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1902	Gulik-1	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1914	Magadon	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1915	Row 11	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1922	Onsz	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1923	Onzg	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1924	On43	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1925	Onz4	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1926	On	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1927	Ab4	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1928	Skio	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1930	Sk43	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1931	Sk35	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1932	Qc	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1933	Mzo	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1934	Mbi	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1975	Jabi	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2047	Blue Pacific	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2059	Tomichka (Blue Belle)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2060	Kiev #8 (Blue Velvet)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2061	Sinyayapitsa (Blue Bird)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2068	Narymskaya Or Fialka	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2071	Zarnitsa (Blue Lightning)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2072	Kamchatskaya (Kamchatka)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2073	Sergey (Blue Moon)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2074	Magadan (Blue Forest)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2075	Novinka (Blue Nova)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2076	N-17 (Blue Magic)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2077	Dimka (Smoky Blue)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2078	F-1-9-58 (Blue Pacific)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
2082	Zolushka (Cinderella)	3	0	0	Open cultivar
363	Omega	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1903	Iz Chuguevki	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1945	Blk 14 Ri K3	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1951	Mtoi	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1952	Mto3	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1953	Mto4	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1954	Mtos	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1955	Mtog	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1956	Mto7	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1957	Mtob	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1958	Mto9	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1959	Mtio	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1960	Mtii	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1961	Mti3	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1962	Mti4	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1963	Mti4-1	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1964	Mti4-2	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1965	Mti4-3	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1966	Mtis	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1967	Mtiga	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1968	Mtigb	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1969	Mti7	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1970	Mtib	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1971	Mti9	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1972	Mtzo	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1973	Mtzi	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1976	Jabz	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1977	Jab3	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1978	Jab4	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1979	Jabs	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1980	Jski	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1981	Jskz	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1982	Jsk3	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1983	Jsk4	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1984	Jsks	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1985	Jskg	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1986	Jsk7	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1987	Jskb	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1988	Jsk9	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1989	Jskio	2	0	0	Open cultivar
parsed only	210	14	0	17, 18, 19, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	217	14	0	17, 18, 19, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9809	14	0	17, 18, 19, 20, 21	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	204	12	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	205	12	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	206	12	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	213	12	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	214	12	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	216	12	0	17, 18, 19, 20	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	220	12	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-24-18	12	0	54, 55	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	207	11	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	208	11	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	209	11	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	211	11	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	212	11	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	215	11	0	17, 18, 20, 22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	41.83	10	0	25, 26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-21-31	9	0	54, 55	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	77.87	9	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9-15	9	0	98, 107, 121	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9811	9	0	17, 18, 20	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-0.5	8	0	67, 70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-20-5.0	8	0	67, 70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22.14	8	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-15-10	8	0	24, 47, 61	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	66.89	8	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9-92	8	0	98, 107, 127	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-17-2.0	7	0	67, 70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-17-2.6	7	0	67, 70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	44.34	7	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	56.15	7	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	73.39	7	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-18-17	6	0	24, 47, 55	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	66.53	6	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9.15	6	0	110	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9.91	6	0	110	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9.92	6	0	110	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22.34	5	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22.61	5	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22.72	5	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	42.45	5	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	44.76	5	0	26, 70	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	44.96	5	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-20	5	0	24, 55	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-30	5	0	24, 55	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-18-38	5	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-19-43.0	4	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	26.72	4	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	40-134	4	0	23	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-15-11	4	0	55	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-15-39	4	0	24	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	64.72	4	0	26	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	9-91	4	0	98, 107	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	Kiev # 8	4	0	106	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-15-34.0	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-15-34.6	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-17.25	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-18.25	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-19.75	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-21.75	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-9.8	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-17-5.5	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-18-1.75	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-18-13.5	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-18-3.25	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-20-19.25	3	0	70, 71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-8-1.75	3	0	67	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.15.10	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.15.32	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.16.15	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.16.17	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.16.24	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.16.4	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.16.44	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.17.50	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.18.17	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.18.38	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.18.4	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.18.41	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.25.5	3	0	62, 63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	Czech #17 (Berry Blue)	3	0	109	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	Q	3	0	44	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	Valery no. 2 (Blue Sky)	3	0	109	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	100-30	2	0	22	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-21.75	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-26.25	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-28.5	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-31.0	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-34.25	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-35.5	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-01-45.0	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-02-70	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-03-40	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-03-5.8	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-03-70	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-03-80	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-16-17.75	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	14-18-0.0	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-03-101.5 C5	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-03-17.8 C9	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-04-20.75	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-05-101.5 C11	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-06-25.5	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-06-26.5	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	22-06-8.5 C13	2	0	71	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	322-17	2	0	13	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-15-32	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-04	2	0	24	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-15	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-17	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-24	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-34	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-16-44	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-18-14	2	0	24, 47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6-25-5	2	0	47	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.16.34	2	0	63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	6.25.17	2	0	63, 64	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	615-1	2	0	13	No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only	673-6	2	0	13	No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 7

History events: 12

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

Status	License	Holder
unknown

Credibility Records

Tier	Score	Assessor	Rationale
tier_3	55	auto	Unclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation

Translation Records

Source Lang	Target Lang	Method	Status	Note
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation ID	Score	Risk	Assessor	Rationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

Status	Visibility	Reviewer	Note
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

Type	Value	Confidence
institution_candidate	University of Saskatchewan	0.60
cultivar_candidate	VIII	0.60
cultivar_candidate	VII	0.60
cultivar_candidate	III	0.60
cultivar_candidate	Appendi	0.60
cultivar_candidate	Russia	0.60
cultivar_candidate	Kurile	0.60
cultivar_candidate	Canada	0.60
cultivar_candidate	Japan	0.60
taxon_keyword	prunus	0.65
taxon_keyword	haskap	0.75
taxon_keyword	lonicera	0.75

Extracted Claims

Type	Claim	Confidence
ornamental_use	pollinator	0.56
growth_habit	dwarf	0.52
institution_reference	University of Saskatchewan	0.60
breeding_cross	Appendi x VIII	0.65
breeding_cross	Appendi x VII	0.65
breeding_cross	Appendi x III	0.65
breeding_cross	Japan x Japan	0.65
breeding_cross	Kurile x Russia	0.65
breeding_cross	Japan x Canada	0.65
year_reference	2011	0.55
year_reference	2010	0.55
year_reference	2009	0.55
year_reference	2008	0.55
year_reference	2012	0.55