Document 102
Title: Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012
Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/haskap/20080042.pdf
Archive provenance: discovery_round_01 curated pdf import | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | source_root=https://research-groups.usask.ca | local_archive=/usr/local/var/www/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_01_second_corpus/20080042.pdf
Type: pdf | Language: ru | Rights: unknown
Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 400
Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 5
Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program
Publisher:
Site:
Year: 2012
Page count:
Type: final report
Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1
| ID | Relation | Source | Target | Source Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 332 | mentioned_in_document | University Of Saskatchewan | Haskap Breeding & Production - Final Report, January 2012 | 102 |
| 331 | cross_parent | Appendi | Viii | 102 |
| 330 | cross_parent | Appendi | Vii | 102 |
| 329 | cross_parent | Appendi | Iii | 102 |
| 328 | cross_parent | Japan | Japan | 102 |
| 327 | cross_parent | Kurile | Russia | 102 |
| 326 | cross_parent | Japan | Canada | 102 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 719 | year_reference | 2008 | Year reference 2008 |
| 720 | year_reference | 2009 | Year reference 2009 |
| 721 | year_reference | 2010 | Year reference 2010 |
| 722 | year_reference | 2011 | Year reference 2011 |
| 718 | year_reference | 2012 | Year reference 2012 |
| 723 | cross_event | 2012 | Japan x Canada |
| 724 | cross_event | 2012 | Kurile x Russia |
| 725 | cross_event | 2012 | Japan x Japan |
| 726 | cross_event | 2012 | Appendi x III |
| 727 | cross_event | 2012 | Appendi x VII |
| 728 | cross_event | 2012 | Appendi x VIII |
| 729 | institution_mention | 2012 | University Of Saskatchewan |
Cultivar: Tundra
Pages in document: p5 p39 p45 p52 p54 p56 p57 p58 p67 p71 p72 p79 p98 p106 p107 p110 p115 p117 p122 p125 p133
| Page | Basis | Snippet |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010. |
| 39 | breeding_parent_named | Russia x (Kurile x Russia) Crosses ... Female Male ... ERS 1 SX2-05 TUNDRA ... TLK 11 SX2-10 TUNDRA |
| 45 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program. |
| 52 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well. |
| 54 | explicit_cultivar_reference | In the spring of 2010 all of the six selections were observed to see if bloom would occur at the same time as ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’. |
| 56 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Figure 16 [shows] Tundra Borealis Indigo Gem Honey Bee |
| 57 | explicit_cultivar_reference | ‘Honey Bee’ was the best choice because it alone bloomed at the right time and gave good fruit set when crossed to ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’. |
| 58 | explicit_cultivar_reference | ‘Tundra’ and possibly ‘Indigo Gem’ are more durable in machinery |
| 67 | explicit_cultivar_reference | In Blocks 14 and 22 Tundra plants are inter-planted for comparison. Most of the above selections have larger fruit than Tundra. |
| 71 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Tundra 1.085 17.4 1.42 3.5 3 5 3 3.63 |
| 72 | explicit_cultivar_reference | The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'. |
| 79 | explicit_cultivar_reference | the fruit of 4 important breeding parents and out ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties |
| 98 | explicit_cultivar_reference | The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’). |
| 106 | introduction_sentence | 'Tundra' was the best of those that that have mechanization potential. Its fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles varieties currently available in Canada. |
| 107 | explicit_cultivar_reference | But Tundra is a bit slow to propagate, so 9-15, 9-91, and 9-92 were released for further testing. |
| 110 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a |
| 115 | explicit_cultivar_reference | There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties. |
| 117 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Right: ‘Tundra’ a cultivar for the commercial gardener |
| 122 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best |
| 125 | explicit_cultivar_reference | Our new variety ‘Tundra’ was one of the few selections that held up to shake harvesting and running through sorting lines. |
| 133 | explicit_cultivar_reference | This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected. |
| Page | Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | description_snippet | Referenced as one of the program's named varieties used in crosses with various hybrids and Japanese germplasm in 2010. | 0.95 |
| 5 | recommendation_context | Table 22 concerns observations and tests to determine a pollinator variety for 'Tundra' and 'Borealis'. | 0.96 |
| 5 | caption_context | Mentioned in the List of Tables as the subject of Tables 16 and 22. | 0.97 |
| 39 | caption_context | Tundra appears on this page as the named male parent in a series of 2009 Russia x (Kurile x Russia) haskap crosses. | 0.98 |
| 39 | entry_pedigree | Recorded crosses on this page pair female parents SX2-05, SX2-08, SX2-13, SX2-16, SX2-17, and SX2-10 with male parent Tundra under the Russia x (Kurile x Russia) section. | 0.97 |
| 39 | source_reference_abbreviation | The table uses person-number abbreviations ERS, PJR, and TLK to identify individual crosses involving Tundra as male parent. | 0.86 |
| 45 | description_snippet | Tundra is identified as one of the program's existing best cultivars. | 0.99 |
| 45 | recommendation_context | Many crosses involving Tundra were done to verify possible pollinators and to incorporate worthwhile traits. | 0.95 |
| 45 | description_snippet | Haskap requires crosspollination between 2 compatible varieties in order to get fruit set; Tundra is used in that compatibility-testing context on this page. | 0.9 |
| 45 | source_reference_abbreviation | Table 16 lists 2010 crosses involving Tundra with Japanese germplasm and multiple hybrid selections, and includes a Borealis x Tundra cross. | 0.98 |
| 52 | recommendation_context | Tundra is one of the program's currently released varieties. | 0.94 |
| 52 | entry_pedigree | Tundra is described as too closely related to Borealis and the Indigo series, identified here as full sibs. | 0.9 |
| 52 | description_snippet | Tundra does not pollinate Borealis and the Indigo series very well because of close relatedness. | 0.95 |
| 54 | recommendation_context | ‘Tundra’ was used as a bloom-time and pollen-compatibility comparison cultivar in pollinator selection testing. | 0.96 |
| 54 | description_snippet | One propagation company reportedly found 6-24-18 to propagate faster than ‘Tundra’. | 0.92 |
| 56 | caption_context | Tundra is included in the leaf comparison figure alongside Borealis, Indigo Gem, and Honey Bee. | 0.93 |
| 57 | recommendation_context | Honey Bee gave good fruit set when crossed to Tundra. | 0.97 |
| 57 | entry_pedigree | The Indigo series are described as siblings of Borealis and Tundra. | 0.79 |
| 58 | recommendation_context | In the case of commercial growers using mechanical harvesters, ‘Tundra’ is described as more durable in machinery and would be considered one of the main varieties. | 0.96 |
| 58 | recommendation_context | One ‘Honey Bee’ could provide pollen for 4 to 8 ‘Tundra’ plants if planted in close proximity. | 0.93 |
| 67 | caption_context | Shown in Figure 23 as a comparison cultivar. | 0.96 |
| 67 | recommendation_context | Tundra plants are inter-planted in Blocks 14 and 22 for comparison. | 0.95 |
| 67 | fruit_size | Most of the numbered selections shown have larger fruit than Tundra. | 0.95 |
| 71 | fruit_size | Berry weight is listed as 1.085 g. | 0.99 |
| 71 | description_snippet | Brix 17.4, acid 1.42, sweet 3.5, sour 3, bitter 5, aroma 3, overall taste 3.63. | 0.99 |
| 71 | recommendation_context | This named cultivar appears in the comparison cultivar section at the bottom of the table. | 0.98 |
| 72 | entry_pedigree | The Indigo series varieties are full siblings of Borealis and Tundra. | 0.95 |
| 72 | recommendation_context | The Indigo plants were considered runner-ups to Borealis and Tundra. | 0.91 |
| 72 | description_snippet | Experimental Indigo varieties were released in case Borealis and Tundra proved hard to propagate or had field difficulties. | 0.9 |
| 79 | description_snippet | James Dawson's thesis work tracked production of six healthy compounds through the growing season in leaves and fruit, including the variety Tundra. | 0.93 |
| 79 | taxon_context | Tundra is referenced here as a haskap variety within the University of Saskatchewan program context. | 0.9 |
| 98 | entry_pedigree | Tundra is identified as a sister to the Indigo series varieties within the same closely related family group. | 0.95 |
| 98 | selection_origin_reference | Tundra had breeding ID 9-84. | 0.99 |
| 98 | description_snippet | All five Row 9-related varieties discussed here are closely related and share the same mother and father. | 0.88 |
| 98 | description_snippet | Tundra was considered one of the two named varieties for release before additional Indigo selections were included as a safeguard in case propagation proved difficult. | 0.92 |
| 98 | description_snippet | Tundra was hard to propagate in tissue culture relative to some sister selections. | 0.96 |
| 98 | keeping_quality | In sorting-line durability tests, Tundra had the highest durability rating. | 0.98 |
| 98 | caption_context | The page notes that the durability test was done many years earlier on the original bushes and may not predict behavior under commercial harvesting conditions. | 0.86 |
| 106 | release_year_reference | One of two varieties named and released in 2007. | 0.98 |
| 106 | entry_pedigree | From the cross Kiev#8 x Tomichka. | 0.98 |
| 106 | recommendation_context | Described as the best among those with mechanization potential. | 0.96 |
| 106 | fruit_size | Its fruit is described as at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckle varieties currently available in Canada. | 0.95 |
| 107 | description_snippet | Tundra is described as a bit slow to propagate. | 0.96 |
| 107 | fruit_size | The surrounding sentence indicates firmness is a fairly rare trait for large-fruited blue honeysuckles, with Tundra discussed in that immediate context. | 0.63 |
| 110 | release_year_reference | Listed in a table of University of Saskatchewan cultivars released in 2007. | 0.98 |
| 110 | fruit_size | Fruit weight is 1.49 g. | 0.99 |
| 110 | description_snippet | Fruit shape is long flat bullet oval. | 0.97 |
| 110 | flavor_profile | Flavour is sweet tangy. | 0.98 |
| 110 | keeping_quality | Integrity rating is a based on berry condition after conditions mimicking mechanized harvesting and sorting. | 0.99 |
| 110 | breeder_reference | Presented as a University of Saskatchewan cultivar. | 0.96 |
| 115 | flavor_profile | Only a few new plants had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than Tundra. | 0.94 |
| 115 | entry_pedigree | Many desirable selections found that year were descendants of Tundra crossed within material that also included Borealis, the Row9 family, and plants from Dr. Maxine Thompson's program. | 0.78 |
| 115 | recommendation_context | Afuture pollinator selection is being considered for release because it would bloom at the same time as Tundra and have compatible pollen. | 0.94 |
| 115 | recommendation_context | If the new pollinator proves superior to Tundra, growers may wish to plant the new variety in larger numbers and use Borealis and Tundra as pollinators. | 0.89 |
| 115 | description_snippet | Of six superior selections from the new generation, only two bloomed at the same time as Borealis and Tundra. | 0.89 |
| 117 | caption_context | Figure 1 identifies ‘Tundra’ as a cultivar for the commercial gardener. | 0.97 |
| 122 | fruit_size | Tundra is described as having big fat berries. | 0.95 |
| 122 | keeping_quality | In the unharvested-row observation, Tundra was among the selections whose fruit quality held up best over time on the plant. | 0.9 |
| 122 | description_snippet | Selections that had big fat berries were the best in late holding quality comparisons. | 0.83 |
| 125 | description_snippet | Described as a new haskap variety. | 0.93 |
| 125 | keeping_quality | Held up to shake harvesting and running through sorting lines, indicating comparatively durable fruit handling performance among haskap selections. | 0.95 |
| 125 | recommendation_context | Identified as one of the few haskap selections adapted to machine harvest and sorting-line handling. | 0.95 |
| 133 | selection_origin_reference | The row shown in Figure 32 is identified as the row from which the variety Tundra was selected. | 0.95 |
| 133 | caption_context | Figure 32 states that haskap bushes have branches close to the ground and that the pictured row was the source of selection for Tundra. | 0.95 |
Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Tundra (ID 1889) within document 102. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.
Citation focus: cultivar focus: Tundra (ID 1889) | page focus: 5 (auto)
Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.
| Page | Type | Quote | Claim | Entity | Jump |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | description_snippet | Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010. | Referenced as one of the program's named varieties used in crosses with various hybrids and Japanese germplasm in 2010. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 5 | recommendation_context | Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010. | Table 22 concerns observations and tests to determine a pollinator variety for 'Tundra' and 'Borealis'. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 5 | caption_context | Table 16. Crosses between various hybrids and Japanese germplasm and our varieties 'Tundra', 'Borealis', and 'Indigo Gem' in 2010. | Mentioned in the List of Tables as the subject of Tables 16 and 22. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 39 | caption_context | Russia x (Kurile x Russia) Crosses ... Female Male ... ERS 1 SX2-05 TUNDRA ... TLK 11 SX2-10 TUNDRA | Tundra appears on this page as the named male parent in a series of 2009 Russia x (Kurile x Russia) haskap crosses. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 39 | entry_pedigree | Russia x (Kurile x Russia) Crosses ... Female Male ... ERS 1 SX2-05 TUNDRA ... TLK 11 SX2-10 TUNDRA | Recorded crosses on this page pair female parents SX2-05, SX2-08, SX2-13, SX2-16, SX2-17, and SX2-10 with male parent Tundra under the Russi | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 39 | source_reference_abbreviation | Russia x (Kurile x Russia) Crosses ... Female Male ... ERS 1 SX2-05 TUNDRA ... TLK 11 SX2-10 TUNDRA | The table uses person-number abbreviations ERS, PJR, and TLK to identify individual crosses involving Tundra as male parent. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | description_snippet | Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program. | Tundra is identified as one of the program's existing best cultivars. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | recommendation_context | Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program. | Many crosses involving Tundra were done to verify possible pollinators and to incorporate worthwhile traits. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | source_reference_abbreviation | Many crosses were done between our existing best cultivars, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ and superior selections in our breeding program. | Table 16 lists 2010 crosses involving Tundra with Japanese germplasm and multiple hybrid selections, and includes a Borealis x Tundra cross. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | recommendation_context | Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well. | Tundra is one of the program's currently released varieties. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | entry_pedigree | Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well. | Tundra is described as too closely related to Borealis and the Indigo series, identified here as full sibs. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | description_snippet | Our currently released varieties, ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’, and the ‘Indigo’ series are too closely related (full sibs) and therefore do not pollinate each other very well. | Tundra does not pollinate Borealis and the Indigo series very well because of close relatedness. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | recommendation_context | In the spring of 2010 all of the six selections were observed to see if bloom would occur at the same time as ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’. | ‘Tundra’ was used as a bloom-time and pollen-compatibility comparison cultivar in pollinator selection testing. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | description_snippet | In the spring of 2010 all of the six selections were observed to see if bloom would occur at the same time as ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’. | One propagation company reportedly found 6-24-18 to propagate faster than ‘Tundra’. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 56 | caption_context | Figure 16 [shows] Tundra Borealis Indigo Gem Honey Bee | Tundra is included in the leaf comparison figure alongside Borealis, Indigo Gem, and Honey Bee. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 57 | recommendation_context | ‘Honey Bee’ was the best choice because it alone bloomed at the right time and gave good fruit set when crossed to ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’. | Honey Bee gave good fruit set when crossed to Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 57 | entry_pedigree | ‘Honey Bee’ was the best choice because it alone bloomed at the right time and gave good fruit set when crossed to ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’. | The Indigo series are described as siblings of Borealis and Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | recommendation_context | ‘Tundra’ and possibly ‘Indigo Gem’ are more durable in machinery | In the case of commercial growers using mechanical harvesters, ‘Tundra’ is described as more durable in machinery and would be considered on | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 67 | caption_context | In Blocks 14 and 22 Tundra plants are inter-planted for comparison. Most of the above selections have larger fruit than Tundra. | Shown in Figure 23 as a comparison cultivar. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 67 | recommendation_context | In Blocks 14 and 22 Tundra plants are inter-planted for comparison. Most of the above selections have larger fruit than Tundra. | Tundra plants are inter-planted in Blocks 14 and 22 for comparison. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 67 | fruit_size | In Blocks 14 and 22 Tundra plants are inter-planted for comparison. Most of the above selections have larger fruit than Tundra. | Most of the numbered selections shown have larger fruit than Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | fruit_size | Tundra 1.085 17.4 1.42 3.5 3 5 3 3.63 | Berry weight is listed as 1.085 g. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | Tundra 1.085 17.4 1.42 3.5 3 5 3 3.63 | Brix 17.4, acid 1.42, sweet 3.5, sour 3, bitter 5, aroma 3, overall taste 3.63. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | recommendation_context | Tundra 1.085 17.4 1.42 3.5 3 5 3 3.63 | This named cultivar appears in the comparison cultivar section at the bottom of the table. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_pedigree | The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'. | The Indigo series varieties are full siblings of Borealis and Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | recommendation_context | The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'. | The Indigo plants were considered runner-ups to Borealis and Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | description_snippet | The Indigo series varieties are full sibs of 'Borealis' and 'Tundra'. | Experimental Indigo varieties were released in case Borealis and Tundra proved hard to propagate or had field difficulties. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 79 | description_snippet | the fruit of 4 important breeding parents and out ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties | James Dawson's thesis work tracked production of six healthy compounds through the growing season in leaves and fruit, including the variety | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 79 | taxon_context | the fruit of 4 important breeding parents and out ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties | Tundra is referenced here as a haskap variety within the University of Saskatchewan program context. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 98 | entry_pedigree | The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’). | Tundra is identified as a sister to the Indigo series varieties within the same closely related family group. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 98 | selection_origin_reference | The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’). | Tundra had breeding ID 9-84. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 98 | description_snippet | The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’). | All five Row 9-related varieties discussed here are closely related and share the same mother and father. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 98 | keeping_quality | The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’). | In sorting-line durability tests, Tundra had the highest durability rating. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 98 | caption_context | The Indigo series varieties are sisters to ‘Borealis’ (breeding ID ‘9-94’) and ‘Tundra’ (breeding ID ‘9-84’). | The page notes that the durability test was done many years earlier on the original bushes and may not predict behavior under commercial har | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 106 | release_year_reference | 'Tundra' was the best of those that that have mechanization potential. Its fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles varieties currently available in Canada. | One of two varieties named and released in 2007. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 106 | entry_pedigree | 'Tundra' was the best of those that that have mechanization potential. Its fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles varieties currently available in Canada. | From the cross Kiev#8 x Tomichka. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 106 | recommendation_context | 'Tundra' was the best of those that that have mechanization potential. Its fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles varieties currently available in Canada. | Described as the best among those with mechanization potential. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 106 | fruit_size | 'Tundra' was the best of those that that have mechanization potential. Its fruit is at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckles varieties currently available in Canada. | Its fruit is described as at least 50% larger than blue honeysuckle varieties currently available in Canada. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 107 | description_snippet | But Tundra is a bit slow to propagate, so 9-15, 9-91, and 9-92 were released for further testing. | Tundra is described as a bit slow to propagate. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 107 | fruit_size | But Tundra is a bit slow to propagate, so 9-15, 9-91, and 9-92 were released for further testing. | The surrounding sentence indicates firmness is a fairly rare trait for large-fruited blue honeysuckles, with Tundra discussed in that immedi | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 110 | release_year_reference | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a | Listed in a table of University of Saskatchewan cultivars released in 2007. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 110 | fruit_size | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a | Fruit weight is 1.49 g. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 110 | description_snippet | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a | Fruit shape is long flat bullet oval. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 110 | flavor_profile | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a | Flavour is sweet tangy. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 110 | keeping_quality | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a | Integrity rating is a based on berry condition after conditions mimicking mechanized harvesting and sorting. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 110 | breeder_reference | Tundra Dry 1.49 long flat bullet oval sweet tangy a | Presented as a University of Saskatchewan cultivar. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 115 | flavor_profile | There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties. | Only a few new plants had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 115 | entry_pedigree | There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties. | Many desirable selections found that year were descendants of Tundra crossed within material that also included Borealis, the Row9 family, a | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 115 | recommendation_context | There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties. | Afuture pollinator selection is being considered for release because it would bloom at the same time as Tundra and have compatible pollen. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 115 | description_snippet | There were only a few plants that had berries with somewhat better fresh flavour than our ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ varieties. | Of six superior selections from the new generation, only two bloomed at the same time as Borealis and Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 117 | caption_context | Right: ‘Tundra’ a cultivar for the commercial gardener | Figure 1 identifies ‘Tundra’ as a cultivar for the commercial gardener. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 122 | fruit_size | Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best | Tundra is described as having big fat berries. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 122 | keeping_quality | Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best | In the unharvested-row observation, Tundra was among the selections whose fruit quality held up best over time on the plant. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 122 | description_snippet | Selections that had big fat berries (like Borealis and Tundra) were the best | Selections that had big fat berries were the best in late holding quality comparisons. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 125 | description_snippet | Our new variety ‘Tundra’ was one of the few selections that held up to shake harvesting and running through sorting lines. | Described as a new haskap variety. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 125 | keeping_quality | Our new variety ‘Tundra’ was one of the few selections that held up to shake harvesting and running through sorting lines. | Held up to shake harvesting and running through sorting lines, indicating comparatively durable fruit handling performance among haskap sele | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 125 | recommendation_context | Our new variety ‘Tundra’ was one of the few selections that held up to shake harvesting and running through sorting lines. | Identified as one of the few haskap selections adapted to machine harvest and sorting-line handling. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 133 | selection_origin_reference | This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected. | The row shown in Figure 32 is identified as the row from which the variety Tundra was selected. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
| 133 | caption_context | This particular row was the one from which our new varieties ‘Borealis’ and ‘Tundra’ were selected. | Figure 32 states that haskap bushes have branches close to the ground and that the pictured row was the source of selection for Tundra. | cultivar 1889 | Open Review parse |
Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.
| ID | Cultivar | Evidence / Claims | Relationships | History / Pages | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1888 | Borealis | 91 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1893 | Honey Bee | 83 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1889 | Tundra | 64 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1891 | Berry Blue | 41 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1894 | Indigo Gem | 17 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1941 | Jri9-6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1895 | Indigo Yum | 14 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2045 | Bti | 11 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1916 | Czech#17 (Berry Blue) | 10 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 268 | Appendi | 3 | 3 | 3 | Open cultivar |
| 1912 | Gz3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1918 | Yukon Family | 9 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 264 | Japan | 2 | 3 | 3 | Open cultivar |
| 1917 | Row 11 Vigour | 8 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1919 | Magadon (C10) | 7 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2046 | Suvenir | 7 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2052 | Indigo Treat | 7 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 308 | Carmine Jewel | 6 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1911 | Gzo | 6 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2053 | Bugnet | 6 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1896 | Pervenec | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1897 | Gulik | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1900 | Morena | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1910 | Cio | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1938 | Jri9-2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1939 | Jri9-3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1974 | J3 Series | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2044 | Indigo Series | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2054 | Lebedushka | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2055 | Pushkinskaya | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1890 | Blue Belle | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1898 | Kamchadalka | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1899 | Erakingra | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1913 | Yukon | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1920 | Blue Velvet | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1921 | Yukon Series | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1929 | Sk | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1935 | Mb | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1940 | Jri9-7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1942 | Jri9-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1943 | Jr9-3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1944 | Jrz7-1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2057 | Tomichka | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 265 | Canada | 1 | 1 | 1 | Open cultivar |
| 266 | Kurile | 1 | 1 | 1 | Open cultivar |
| 267 | Russia | 1 | 1 | 1 | Open cultivar |
| 269 | Iii | 1 | 1 | 1 | Open cultivar |
| 270 | Vii | 1 | 1 | 1 | Open cultivar |
| 271 | Viii | 1 | 1 | 1 | Open cultivar |
| 1901 | Regel Iz Chuguevki | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1902 | Gulik-1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1914 | Magadon | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1915 | Row 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1922 | Onsz | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1923 | Onzg | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1924 | On43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1925 | Onz4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1926 | On | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1927 | Ab4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1928 | Skio | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1930 | Sk43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1931 | Sk35 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1932 | Qc | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1933 | Mzo | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1934 | Mbi | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1975 | Jabi | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2047 | Blue Pacific | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2059 | Tomichka (Blue Belle) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2060 | Kiev #8 (Blue Velvet) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2061 | Sinyayapitsa (Blue Bird) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2068 | Narymskaya Or Fialka | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2071 | Zarnitsa (Blue Lightning) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2072 | Kamchatskaya (Kamchatka) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2073 | Sergey (Blue Moon) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2074 | Magadan (Blue Forest) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2075 | Novinka (Blue Nova) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2076 | N-17 (Blue Magic) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2077 | Dimka (Smoky Blue) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2078 | F-1-9-58 (Blue Pacific) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 2082 | Zolushka (Cinderella) | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 363 | Omega | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1903 | Iz Chuguevki | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1945 | Blk 14 Ri K3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1951 | Mtoi | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1952 | Mto3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1953 | Mto4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1954 | Mtos | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1955 | Mtog | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1956 | Mto7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1957 | Mtob | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1958 | Mto9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1959 | Mtio | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1960 | Mtii | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1961 | Mti3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1962 | Mti4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1963 | Mti4-1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1964 | Mti4-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1965 | Mti4-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1966 | Mtis | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1967 | Mtiga | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1968 | Mtigb | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1969 | Mti7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1970 | Mtib | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1971 | Mti9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1972 | Mtzo | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1973 | Mtzi | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1976 | Jabz | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1977 | Jab3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1978 | Jab4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1979 | Jabs | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1980 | Jski | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1981 | Jskz | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1982 | Jsk3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1983 | Jsk4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1984 | Jsks | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1985 | Jskg | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1986 | Jsk7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1987 | Jskb | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1988 | Jsk9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1989 | Jskio | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| parsed only | 210 | 14 | 0 | 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 217 | 14 | 0 | 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9809 | 14 | 0 | 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 204 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 205 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 206 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 213 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 214 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 216 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 19, 20 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 220 | 12 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-24-18 | 12 | 0 | 54, 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 207 | 11 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 208 | 11 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 209 | 11 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 211 | 11 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 212 | 11 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 215 | 11 | 0 | 17, 18, 20, 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 41.83 | 10 | 0 | 25, 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-21-31 | 9 | 0 | 54, 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 77.87 | 9 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9-15 | 9 | 0 | 98, 107, 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9811 | 9 | 0 | 17, 18, 20 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-0.5 | 8 | 0 | 67, 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-20-5.0 | 8 | 0 | 67, 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22.14 | 8 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-15-10 | 8 | 0 | 24, 47, 61 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 66.89 | 8 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9-92 | 8 | 0 | 98, 107, 127 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-17-2.0 | 7 | 0 | 67, 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-17-2.6 | 7 | 0 | 67, 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 44.34 | 7 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 56.15 | 7 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 73.39 | 7 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-18-17 | 6 | 0 | 24, 47, 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 66.53 | 6 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9.15 | 6 | 0 | 110 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9.91 | 6 | 0 | 110 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9.92 | 6 | 0 | 110 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22.34 | 5 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22.61 | 5 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22.72 | 5 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 42.45 | 5 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 44.76 | 5 | 0 | 26, 70 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 44.96 | 5 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-20 | 5 | 0 | 24, 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-30 | 5 | 0 | 24, 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-18-38 | 5 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-19-43.0 | 4 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 26.72 | 4 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 40-134 | 4 | 0 | 23 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-15-11 | 4 | 0 | 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-15-39 | 4 | 0 | 24 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 64.72 | 4 | 0 | 26 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 9-91 | 4 | 0 | 98, 107 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Kiev # 8 | 4 | 0 | 106 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-15-34.0 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-15-34.6 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-17.25 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-18.25 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-19.75 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-21.75 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-9.8 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-17-5.5 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-18-1.75 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-18-13.5 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-18-3.25 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-20-19.25 | 3 | 0 | 70, 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-8-1.75 | 3 | 0 | 67 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.15.10 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.15.32 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.16.15 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.16.17 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.16.24 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.16.4 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.16.44 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.17.50 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.18.17 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.18.38 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.18.4 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.18.41 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.25.5 | 3 | 0 | 62, 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Czech #17 (Berry Blue) | 3 | 0 | 109 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Q | 3 | 0 | 44 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Valery no. 2 (Blue Sky) | 3 | 0 | 109 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 100-30 | 2 | 0 | 22 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-21.75 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-26.25 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-28.5 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-31.0 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-34.25 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-35.5 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-01-45.0 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-02-70 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-03-40 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-03-5.8 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-03-70 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-03-80 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-16-17.75 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 14-18-0.0 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-03-101.5 C5 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-03-17.8 C9 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-04-20.75 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-05-101.5 C11 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-06-25.5 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-06-26.5 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 22-06-8.5 C13 | 2 | 0 | 71 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 322-17 | 2 | 0 | 13 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-15-32 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-04 | 2 | 0 | 24 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-15 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-17 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-24 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-34 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-16-44 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-18-14 | 2 | 0 | 24, 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6-25-5 | 2 | 0 | 47 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.16.34 | 2 | 0 | 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 6.25.17 | 2 | 0 | 63, 64 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 615-1 | 2 | 0 | 13 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 673-6 | 2 | 0 | 13 | No staging cultivar page yet |
Relationships: 7
History events: 12
These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.
| Status | License | Holder |
|---|---|---|
| unknown |
| Tier | Score | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| tier_3 | 55 | auto | Unclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation |
| Source Lang | Target Lang | Method | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation records. | ||||
| Translation ID | Score | Risk | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation assessments. | ||||
| Status | Visibility | Reviewer | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| No publication records. | |||
| Type | Value | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| institution_candidate | University of Saskatchewan | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | VIII | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | VII | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | III | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | Appendi | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | Russia | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | Kurile | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | Canada | 0.60 |
| cultivar_candidate | Japan | 0.60 |
| taxon_keyword | prunus | 0.65 |
| taxon_keyword | haskap | 0.75 |
| taxon_keyword | lonicera | 0.75 |
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| ornamental_use | pollinator | 0.56 |
| growth_habit | dwarf | 0.52 |
| institution_reference | University of Saskatchewan | 0.60 |
| breeding_cross | Appendi x VIII | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | Appendi x VII | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | Appendi x III | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | Japan x Japan | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | Kurile x Russia | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | Japan x Canada | 0.65 |
| year_reference | 2011 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2010 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2009 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2008 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2012 | 0.55 |