Document 7
Title: Minnesota #1695
Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content
Archive provenance: training-candidate-full-doc-no-ocr
Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown
Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 1 | Evidence claims: 400
Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 91
Institution: University of Minnesota
Publisher: University of Minnesota
Site: University of Minnesota Conservancy
Year:
Page count: 138
Type: dissertation
Metadata source: intake_backfill_v1
| ID | Relation | Source | Target | Source Doc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog relationships linked to this document. | ||||
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118 | year_reference | 1926 | Year reference 1926 |
| 116 | year_reference | 1941 | Year reference 1941 |
| 126 | year_reference | 1993 | Year reference 1993 |
| 122 | year_reference | 1994 | Year reference 1994 |
| 128 | year_reference | 1996 | Year reference 1996 |
| 125 | year_reference | 2001 | Year reference 2001 |
| 129 | year_reference | 2004 | Year reference 2004 |
| 124 | year_reference | 2008 | Year reference 2008 |
| 117 | year_reference | 2009 | Year reference 2009 |
| 121 | year_reference | 2011 | Year reference 2011 |
| 123 | year_reference | 2012 | Year reference 2012 |
| 127 | year_reference | 2013 | Year reference 2013 |
| 119 | year_reference | 2014 | Year reference 2014 |
| 120 | year_reference | 2015 | Year reference 2015 |
| 135 | release_event | 2015 | Release event 2015 |
| 115 | year_reference | 2016 | Year reference 2016 |
| 130 | cross_event | 2016 | and cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I |
| 131 | cross_event | 2016 | environments of E x periment I |
| 132 | cross_event | 2016 | Greenhouse environment of E x periment I |
| 133 | cross_event | 2016 | germination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus |
| 134 | cross_event | 2016 | germination in the field environments of E x periments I or II |
| 136 | selection_origin_event | Selection origin China not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al | |
| 137 | selection_origin_event | Selection origin Europe to North America to | |
| 138 | selection_origin_event | Selection origin western Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P |
Select a linked cultivar to inspect the raw parsed details from this document beside the source PDF.
Citation focus: page focus: 91
Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.
| Page | Type | Quote | Claim | Entity | Jump |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | description_snippet | The most commonly cultivated tart cherry cultivar in North America is ‘Montmorency’, which accounts for 96% of the trees in production (Brown et al., 1989). | ‘Montmorency’ is presented as the most widely cultivated tart cherry cultivar in North America and is reported to represent approximately 96 | cultivar 170 | Open Review parse |
| 13 | source_reference_abbreviation | The most commonly cultivated tart cherry cultivar in North America is ‘Montmorency’, which accounts for 96% of the trees in production (Brown et al., 1989). | Production prevalence claim is attributed to Brown et al. 1989. | cultivar 170 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | release_year_reference | The Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Fruit Breeding Farm released Moongold and Sungold, two relatively winter-hardy apricots, in 1961 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Moongold was released in 1961 by the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Fruit Breeding Farm. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | selection_origin_reference | The Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Fruit Breeding Farm released Moongold and Sungold, two relatively winter-hardy apricots, in 1961 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Source indicates Moongold is a Minnesota breeding release from an affiliated University of Minnesota program. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | entry_hardiness_observation | The Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Fruit Breeding Farm released Moongold and Sungold, two relatively winter-hardy apricots, in 1961 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Moongold is described as a relatively winter-hardy apricot. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | source_reference_abbreviation | The Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Fruit Breeding Farm released Moongold and Sungold, two relatively winter-hardy apricots, in 1961 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Brooks and Olmo, 1997 is the cited source for the release statement. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | release_year_reference | In the early 1950s, P. cerasus Northstar and Meteor were released by the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Northstar was released by the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm in the early 1950s. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | selection_origin_reference | In the early 1950s, P. cerasus Northstar and Meteor were released by the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Northstar is identified as a P. cerasus cultivar from University of Minnesota release history. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | source_reference_abbreviation | In the early 1950s, P. cerasus Northstar and Meteor were released by the University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Brooks and Olmo, 1997 supports this release information. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | release_year_reference | The University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985. | La Crescent was introduced in 1923 by the University of Minnesota. | cultivar 1397 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | selection_origin_reference | The University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985. | La Crescent is part of the University of Minnesota plum hybrid introduction sequence in the 1900s. | cultivar 1397 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | source_reference_abbreviation | The University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985. | Brooks and Olmo, 1997 is the source cited for this introduction timeline. | cultivar 1397 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | release_year_reference | The University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Alderman was released in 1985 by the University of Minnesota. | cultivar 1472 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | selection_origin_reference | The University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Alderman is included among University of Minnesota plum hybrids introduced in the 1900s. | cultivar 1472 | Open Review parse |
| 14 | source_reference_abbreviation | The University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985 (Brooks and Olmo, 1997). | Brooks and Olmo, 1997 is the cited source for Alderman’s release date. | cultivar 1472 | Open Review parse |
| 16 | description_snippet | Some Prunus species, like P. serotina Ehrh., have escaped cultivation and become invasive in parts of Europe. Originally introduced for erosion control, it invaded agricultural land and fragments of woody habitat. | P. serotina Ehrh. is documented as escaping cultivation and becoming invasive in Europe; it was introduced for erosion control but subsequen | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 16 | recommendation_context | Some Prunus species, like P. serotina Ehrh., have escaped cultivation and become invasive in parts of Europe. Originally introduced for erosion control, it invaded agricultural land and fragments of woody habitat. | The page recommends that breeders and others consider invasive potential before propagating or releasing cultivars, because selected traits | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 16 | source_reference_abbreviation | Some Prunus species, like P. serotina Ehrh., have escaped cultivation and become invasive in parts of Europe. Originally introduced for erosion control, it invaded agricultural land and fragments of woody habitat. | Anderson et al. (2006) is cited for the link between breeding for stress tolerance/disease resistance and elevated invasive potential. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 17 | taxon_context | Some Prunus species, like P. serotina Ehrh., have escaped cultivation and become invasive in parts of Europe. Originally, P. serotina was introduced for erosion control but it invaded agricultural land and fragments of w | P. serotina is documented as an escaped cultivated species that became invasive in parts of Europe. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 17 | anecdote_snippet | Some Prunus species, like P. serotina Ehrh., have escaped cultivation and become invasive in parts of Europe. Originally, P. serotina was introduced for erosion control but it invaded agricultural land and fragments of w | After introduction for erosion control, P. serotina spread into agricultural land and woody habitat fragments. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 17 | source_reference_abbreviation | Some Prunus species, like P. serotina Ehrh., have escaped cultivation and become invasive in parts of Europe. Originally, P. serotina was introduced for erosion control but it invaded agricultural land and fragments of w | Deckers et al. (2005) report the invasive behavior and management consequences. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 17 | description_snippet | P. americana had also shown characteristics that are indicative of high invasive potential... relatively high germination success, and it easily produces root suckers and thus, has the ability to form, thick stands veget | P. americana thrives across a broad habitat range and has high germination and clonal spread via root suckers, contributing to thick vegetat | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 17 | recommendation_context | P. americana had also shown characteristics that are indicative of high invasive potential... relatively high germination success, and it easily produces root suckers and thus, has the ability to form, thick stands veget | Its invasive-character profile is relevant because P. americana is in the background of many interspecific, winter-hardy plum cultivars. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 17 | source_reference_abbreviation | P. americana had also shown characteristics that are indicative of high invasive potential... relatively high germination success, and it easily produces root suckers and thus, has the ability to form, thick stands veget | Francis (2004) is cited for the habitat breadth and traits associated with invasive behavior. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 24 | description_snippet | Progeny from the plum cultivars 'Hazel', 'Whittaker', 'South Dakota', and 'Hennepin' had high % germination, vigorous seedling growth, low to moderate herbivore pressure, and limited vegetative propagation via suckering, | Plum cultivar Hazel progeny are described as having high seed germination, vigorous seedling growth, low-to-moderate herbivore pressure, lim | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Scarification or complete removal of the endocarp has increased germination percentages and resulted in faster germination rates for P. americana. | In this page's evidence, endocarp scarification or removal is associated with higher germination percentage and faster germination in Prunus | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Scarification or the complete removal of the endocarp has increased germination... in P. americana, P. cerasus L., and P. persica Batsch.; P. domestica L. and P. angustifolia ... did not impact. | For Prunus cerasus, endocarp scarification is reported to improve germination percentage and speed in this page. | cultivar 1476 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Endocarp scarification has increased germination percentages and faster rates for P. americana, P. cerasus L., and P. persica Batsch. | For Prunus persica, this page states endocarp removal/scarification increases germination percentage and speed. | cultivar 1477 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | In P. domestica L. and P. angustifolia Marsh., scarification or complete removal of the endocarp did not impact germination. | This page reports no measurable impact of endocarp scarification/removal on germination of Prunus domestica. | cultivar 1478 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | In P. domestica L. and P. angustifolia Marsh., scarification ... did not impact germination; warm stratification at 20-25 °Cincreased germination in P. angustifolia. | Scarification/removal of endocarp showed no germination impact for Prunus angustifolia. | cultivar 1479 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | entry_hardiness_observation | In P. domestica L. and P. angustifolia Marsh., scarification ... did not impact germination; warm stratification at 20-25 °Cincreased germination in P. angustifolia. | Moist warm pre-stratification (20-25 °C) is reported to improve germination in Prunus angustifolia in this dataset. | cultivar 1479 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Prior to cold stratification, moist, warm stratification at 20-25 °Chas been shown to increase seed germination percentages in ... P. cerasifera Ehrh. | Prunus cerasifera is reported to benefit from moist warm stratification at 20–25 °Cbefore cold stratification. | cultivar 1480 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Moist, warm stratification at 20-25°C ... increased germination percentages in ... P. spinosa L. | Prunus spinosa is included in the list of taxa whose germination increased after moist warm pre-stratification. | cultivar 1481 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Moist, warm stratification at 20-25°Chas been shown to increase seed germination percentages in ... P. virginiana L. | Prunus virginiana is reported as responding positively to warm pre-stratification (20–25 °C) in this page. | cultivar 1482 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | Warm pre-stratification at 20-25°Chas been shown to increase germination in the species P. campanulata Maxim. | Prunus campanulata is cited as benefiting from warm stratification treatment before cold stratification. | cultivar 1483 | Open Review parse |
| 27 | description_snippet | For example, P. armeniaca L. cultivars require around 50 days of cold stratification whereas ... P. domestica and P. cerasus require longer periods, 90 or 90-150 days respectively. | Peach-family cultivars (Prunus armeniaca) are described as requiring about 50 days of cold stratification. | cultivar 1484 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | description_snippet | For P. persica Batsch., germination begins after 8 weeks of cold stratification and continues increasing until about 12 weeks. | Peach germination response on this page is tied to prolonged cold stratification, beginning near 8 weeks and extending to roughly 12 weeks. | cultivar 1485 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | source_reference_abbreviation | For P. persica Batsch., germination begins after 8 weeks of cold stratification and continues increasing until about 12 weeks. | The peach germination timing is attributed to Martínez-Gómez and Dicenta (2001). | cultivar 1485 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | entry_hardiness_observation | For P. americana, scarification or complete removal of the endocarp has increased germination percentages and resulted in faster germination rates. | Endocarp scarification or removal is reported as positively influencing germination performance in this taxon. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | source_reference_abbreviation | For P. americana, scarification or complete removal of the endocarp has increased germination percentages and resulted in faster germination rates. | The effect is supported by cited works including Chen et al. (2007), Grisez et al. (2008), and Kristiansen and Jenson (2009). | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | description_snippet | For P. angustifolia Marsh., scarification or complete removal of the endocarp did not impact germination. | No significant impact from scarification/endocarp removal on germination is stated for this taxon. | cultivar 1486 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | entry_hardiness_observation | Around 44% of mature seed of the invasive P. serotina germinates. | The page-neighbor context associates >44% mature-seed germination with notable invasive potential. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 28 | anecdote_snippet | Around 44% of mature seed of the invasive P. serotina germinates. | Threshold framing is presented as high germination being >50% in field conditions with >80% seedling survival indicating establishment risk. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 30 | entry_location | In 2014, fruits of all tart cherry, except for P. cerasus 'Northstar', and all plum germplasm were collected at maturity at the University of Minnesota Excelsior, MN site... 'Northstar' fruits were collected during week | 'Northstar' fruit was collected in week 23 (2013) and week 29 (2014) from a tree in Saint Paul, MN at 44°59’3.6744” N, -93°4’7.2546” W. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 30 | description_snippet | In 2014, fruits of all tart cherry, except for P. cerasus 'Northstar', and all plum germplasm were collected at maturity at the University of Minnesota Excelsior, MN site... 'Northstar' fruits were collected during week | Experiment III fruit type categories include tart cherry, and 'Northstar' is treated as a tart cherry cultivar within that framework. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 30 | source_reference_abbreviation | In 2014, fruits of all tart cherry, except for P. cerasus 'Northstar', and all plum germplasm were collected at maturity at the University of Minnesota Excelsior, MN site... 'Northstar' fruits were collected during week | Tart cherry classification decision on this page references Brown et al. 1989. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 40 | description_snippet | non-scarified seed had a range in average % germination from 33.3% for Westcot to 100.0% for Moongold, with Westcot differing significantly from both Moongold and Sungold | In the greenhouse, Westcot had the lowest cited non-scarified germination among the named apricot cultivars (33.3%) and was significantly di | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 40 | source_reference_abbreviation | non-scarified seed had a range in average % germination from 33.3% for Westcot to 100.0% for Moongold, with Westcot differing significantly from both Moongold and Sungold | This page references Table 3 for non-scarified and scarified apricot germination % and weeks-to-germination results. | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 40 | description_snippet | range in average % germination was 20.8% for Moongold to 66.7% for Sungold ... Westcot differing significantly from both Moongold and Sungold; non-scarified week average ranged to 2.0 for Moongold | In the field environment of Experiment I, Moongold is cited at the low end of non-scarified germination (20.8%), significantly lower than Su | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 40 | source_reference_abbreviation | range in average % germination was 20.8% for Moongold to 66.7% for Sungold ... Westcot differing significantly from both Moongold and Sungold; non-scarified week average ranged to 2.0 for Moongold | Results for Moongold are tabulated in Table 3 (Experiment I) and Table 4 (adjacent Experiment II context). | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 40 | description_snippet | Westcot differing significantly from both Moongold and Sungold ... range in average % germination was 20.8% for Moongold to 66.7% for Sungold | In the field environment, Sungold is cited at the high end of non-scarified germination (66.7%) and differed significantly from Moongold and | cultivar 1469 | Open Review parse |
| 40 | source_reference_abbreviation | Westcot differing significantly from both Moongold and Sungold ... range in average % germination was 20.8% for Moongold to 66.7% for Sungold | The comparative claims for Sungold reference Table 3 for Experiment Iand Table 4 in the following experimental section. | cultivar 1469 | Open Review parse |
| 41 | description_snippet | Non-scarified seed ranged from 0.8 for 'Debbie's Gold' to 2.0 for MN203; for 'Debbie's Gold' there was a significant difference in average number of weeks for germination between non-scarified and scarified seed (Table 4 | In greenhouse Experiment II, Debbie's Gold had the fastest non-scarified germination speed among reported apricot entries (0.8 weeks), with | cultivar 1488 | Open Review parse |
| 41 | description_snippet | For non-scarified seed, the average number of weeks for germination ranged from 0.8 for 'Debbie's Gold' to 2.0 for MN203, with MN203 being significantly different than all other apricot cultivars (Table 4). | Within greenhouse non-scarified seed, MN203 had the slowest average germination timing (2.0 weeks) and was reported as significantly differe | cultivar 1489 | Open Review parse |
| 41 | description_snippet | For seed stored for 26 months, averages ranged from 25.0% for Westcot to 70.8% for Moongold with Westcot being significantly different than Moongold (Table 5). | Field Experiment II data at 26 months of seed storage showed Westcot at 25.0% germination, and it differed significantly from Moongold. | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 41 | description_snippet | For seed stored for 13 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for MN203 to 64.6% for Sungold, with Westcot and Sungold differing significantly from MN203 (Table 5). | Field Experiment II 13-month seed storage comparison showed Sungold at 64.6% germination and a significant difference from MN203. | cultivar 1469 | Open Review parse |
| 42 | description_snippet | 4.2% for MN203 to 64.6% for Sungold with Westcot and Sungold differing significantly from MN203 (Table 5). | MN203 had the low end of the reported apricot % germination range (4.2%), and this value was significantly different from Sungold. | cultivar 1489 | Open Review parse |
| 42 | entry_hardiness_observation | 4.2% for MN203 to 64.6% for Sungold with Westcot and Sungold differing significantly from MN203 (Table 5). | No apricot seedlings in the greenhouse environment produced root suckers. | cultivar 1489 | Open Review parse |
| 42 | description_snippet | No apricot seedlings germinated in the greenhouse environment produced root suckers (Table 9). Two replications of seedlings from Moongold and one replication of | On this page segment, Moongold is mentioned in root-sucker replication context in Table 9, while greenhouse seedlings did not produce root s | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 43 | description_snippet | ‘seedlings from ‘Westcot’ started in the field produced one root sucker (Table 9). At the end of the experiment, % survival of apricot seedlings ... ranged from 83% for ‘Westcot’ to 95% for ‘Debbie’s Gold’ while % surviv | A Westcot apricot field-started seedling cohort produced one root sucker (Table 9). | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 43 | description_snippet | At the end of the experiment, % survival of apricot seedlings germinated in the greenhouse ranged from 83% for ‘Westcot’ to 95% for ‘Debbie’s Gold’. | Debbie’s Gold is associated with the highest greenhouse end-of-experiment survival in the cited apricot survival range (95%). | cultivar 1488 | Open Review parse |
| 43 | description_snippet | ‘...survival for seedlings germinated in the field ranged from 81% for ‘Westcot’ to 100% for ‘Moongold’ (Table 10). | Moongold is associated with the highest reported field survival endpoint (100%) among cited apricot entries in Table 10. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 44 | description_snippet | For non-scarified seed, average number of weeks for germination ranged from 1.0 for ‘Bali’ to 3.6 for ‘Northstar’ ... Average % germination among tart cherry seed stored for 2 months ranged from 8.3% for ‘Northstar’ to 5 | Among non-scarified tart cherry seed, Bali had the fastest average germination timing (1.0 weeks in Experiment II greenhouse). | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 44 | description_snippet | For non-scarified seed, average number of weeks ... ranged from 1.0 for ‘Bali’ to 3.6 for ‘Northstar’ with ‘Northstar’ differing significantly from ‘Suda’ and ‘N87155’. ... Average % germination among tart cherry seed st | In Experiment II greenhouse non-scarified tart cherries, Northstar averaged 3.6 weeks and differed significantly from Suda and N87155. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 44 | description_snippet | ‘Northstar’ differing significantly from ‘Suda’ and ‘N87155’ (Table 4). | Northstar’s experiment II greenhouse germination timing differed significantly from Suda. | cultivar 1491 | Open Review parse |
| 44 | description_snippet | ‘Meteor’ had a significant difference in average % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed ... Average % germination of ‘Meteor’ non-scarified seed was significantly different than ‘N81755’. | Meteor showed a significant germination difference between non-scarified and scarified seed in Experiment II greenhouse. | cultivar 1471 | Open Review parse |
| 44 | description_snippet | Average % germination of ‘Meteor’ non-scarified seed was significantly different than ‘N81755’ (Table 4). | N81755 was part of a significant pairwise non-scarified germination comparison with Meteor in Experiment II greenhouse. | cultivar 1493 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | anecdote_snippet | Replications of seedlings started in the greenhouse from 'Bali', 'Northstar', and 'Suda' produced one or more root suckers. | Bali is named as a tart cherry cultivar whose greenhouse replications produced one or more root suckers. | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | description_snippet | Replications of seedlings started in the greenhouse from 'Bali', 'Northstar', and 'Suda' produced one or more root suckers. | This page supports a non-significant cultivar effect for initial height, initial diameter, change in diameter, and change in TCA among tart | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | anecdote_snippet | Replications started in the greenhouse from 'Northstar' produced one or more root suckers, with 'Northstar' and 'Suda' producing the largest number; in the field % survival reached 100% for 'Northstar'. | Northstar produced one of the largest numbers of root suckers among greenhouse replications. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | productivity | Replications started in the greenhouse from 'Northstar' produced one or more root suckers, with 'Northstar' and 'Suda' producing the largest number; in the field % survival reached 100% for 'Northstar'. | Field survival for Northstar was highest in the observed range at 100% (Table 10 context). | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | description_snippet | Replications started in the greenhouse from 'Northstar' produced one or more root suckers, with 'Northstar' and 'Suda' producing the largest number; in the field % survival reached 100% for 'Northstar'. | No significant difference among tart cherry cultivars was found for initial height, initial stem diameter, change in stem diameter, or chang | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | anecdote_snippet | Replications started in the greenhouse from 'Suda' produced one or more root suckers with 'Northstar' and 'Suda' producing the largest number; greenhouse survival ranged from 67% for 'Suda' to 92% for 'Meteor'. | Suda was among the greenhouse entries with root suckers and had one of the larger counts along with Northstar. | cultivar 1491 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | productivity | Replications started in the greenhouse from 'Suda' produced one or more root suckers with 'Northstar' and 'Suda' producing the largest number; greenhouse survival ranged from 67% for 'Suda' to 92% for 'Meteor'. | Greenhouse survival for tart cherry was lowest for Suda at 67%. | cultivar 1491 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | description_snippet | Replications started in the greenhouse from 'Suda' produced one or more root suckers with 'Northstar' and 'Suda' producing the largest number; greenhouse survival ranged from 67% for 'Suda' to 92% for 'Meteor'. | No significant cultivar effect was detected for initial growth and damage-rated metrics across tested tart cherry entries. | cultivar 1491 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | productivity | For seedlings germinated in the greenhouse, survival ranged from 67% for Suda to 92% for Meteor (Table 10). | Meteor had the highest reported greenhouse survival among tart cherry entries at 92%. | cultivar 1471 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | description_snippet | For seedlings germinated in the greenhouse, survival ranged from 67% for Suda to 92% for Meteor (Table 10). | Meteor is part of a cultivar set showing no statistically significant differences among entries for initial height, initial stem diameter, d | cultivar 1471 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | productivity | For seedlings started in the field, % survival ranged from 89% for 'N81755' to 100% for 'Northstar' (Table 10). | N81755 had the lowest reported field survival among tart cherry entries at 89%. | cultivar 1493 | Open Review parse |
| 45 | description_snippet | For seedlings started in the field, % survival ranged from 89% for 'N81755' to 100% for 'Northstar' (Table 10). | Field-tart cherry growth metrics and change in TCA in this page are reported as not significantly different by cultivar. | cultivar 1493 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | Within the plums Hennepin, Superior, and Winona there were significant differences for % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed (p<0.05; Table 3). | Gracious was included in the plum cultivar set showing a non-scarified versus scarified significance contrast (p<0.05) in Experiment I. | cultivar 1494 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | Averages ranged from 0.0% for Winona to 100.0% for Opal (Table 3). ... ranged from 0.0% for Mount Royal, Stanley, and Tecomseh to 62.5% for Hennepin. | In field Experiment I, plum cultivar averages were cited as reaching 62.5% for Hennepin (highest field percentage listed in this page’s rang | cultivar 1409 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | The range in average % germination for plum cultivars' scarified seed in the greenhouse was 16.7% for Tecomseh to 91.7% for La Crescent and Whittaker. | La Crescent was one of the highest scarified germination performers in greenhouse Experiment Iat 91.7%. | cultivar 1397 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | Average germination percentages ranged from 0.0% for Mount Royal, Stanley, and Tecomseh to 62.5% for Hennepin ... | Field Experiment Iincluded Mount Royal in the lowest-average set at 0.0% germination. | cultivar 1419 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | Non-scarified plum values ranged from 0.0% for Winona to 100.0% for Opal (Table 3). | Opal achieved 100.0% in non-scarified greenhouse germination in Experiment I, the top non-scarified value stated for plum. | cultivar 1495 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | Average germination percentages ranged from 0.0% for Mount Royal, Stanley, and Tecomseh to 62.5% for Hennepin. | Stanley is included in the field Experiment Ilower end with 0.0% average germination. | cultivar 1496 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | The range in average % germination for plum cultivars' scarified seed in the greenhouse was 16.7% for Tecomseh to 91.7% for La Crescent and Whittaker. ... ranged from 0.0% for Mount Royal, Stanley, and Tecomseh to 62.5% | Tecomseh appears as the lowest scarified greenhouse germination point at 16.7%. | cultivar 1497 | Open Review parse |
| 46 | description_snippet | Non-scarified plum values ranged from 0.0% for Winona to 100.0% for Opal. ... Within the plums Hennepin, Superior, and Winona there were significant differences for % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed | Winona had the lowest non-scarified greenhouse germination point at 0.0%. | cultivar 1498 | Open Review parse |
| 47 | description_snippet | For non-scarified seed, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Alderman' to 75.0% for 'Todd' (Table 4). 'Alderman' showed significant differences between non-scarified and scarified seed (Table 4). | Minimum non-scarified germination in the Experiment II plum greenhouse set is attributed to 'Alderman' at 4.2%. | cultivar 1472 | Open Review parse |
| 47 | description_snippet | For non-scarified seed, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Alderman' to 75.0% for 'Todd' (Table 4). | 'Todd' is the top non-scarified value in the cited Experiment II range, 75.0% (Table 4). | cultivar 1499 | Open Review parse |
| 47 | description_snippet | For 'Alderman', 'Gracious', and 'Winona' there were significant differences between non-scarified and scarified seed (Table 4). | 'Gracious' is explicitly listed as showing a significant non-scarified versus scarified germination difference in Experiment II. | cultivar 1494 | Open Review parse |
| 47 | entry_hardiness_observation | For seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5). | In 25-month field storage tests, 'Monitor' is at the low end of the plum germination range at 4.2% (Table 5). | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 48 | description_snippet | Averages for seedlings started in the field ranged from 1.16 mm for seedlings from 'Monitor' to 2.39 mm for seedlings from 'Todd' with 'Todd' differing significantly from a number of plum cultivars (Table 7). | Monitor is a plum cultivar used in field initial stem diameter analysis and is the lower anchor of the stated field range (1.16 mm). | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 48 | description_snippet | 'Monitor' to 75.0% for 'Hennepin' with significant variation being observed among cultivars (Table 5). | Hennepin appears in a cultivar variation statement tied to a 75.0% value in the table context. | cultivar 1409 | Open Review parse |
| 48 | description_snippet | Average initial heights of plum seedlings started in the field ranged from 8.5 cm for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 25.7 cm for seedlings from 'Whittaker' (Table 7). ... average initial diameters ranged from 4.21 mm fo | Mount Royal is the minimum field initial height value in the cited range (8.5 cm), referenced in Table 7 for Experiment III. | cultivar 1419 | Open Review parse |
| 48 | description_snippet | Average initial heights of plum seedlings started in the field ranged from 8.5 cm for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 25.7 cm for seedlings from 'Whittaker' (Table 7). | Whittaker is reported at the upper end of field initial height among measured plum seedlings (25.7 cm), from Table 7. | cultivar 1475 | Open Review parse |
| 48 | description_snippet | For plum seedlings started in the greenhouse, average initial diameters ranged from 4.21 mm for seedlings from 'South Dakota' to 6.88 mm for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' with there being significant variation among culti | South Dakota is the minimum greenhouse initial stem diameter value in Table 6 (4.21 mm). | cultivar 1405 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | 1.69 mm for seedlings from multiple cultivars to 4.64 mm for 'Whittaker' (Table 7). ... Among plum seedlings started in the field there was significant variation ... with 'Whittaker' being significantly different than fo | Whittaker had high stem diameter change in the field relative to other plums; it was significantly different from four other plum cultivars | cultivar 1475 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | ... ranged from 2.7 for seedlings from 'Hazel' to 4.8 for seedlings from 'Todd' (Table 8). ... seedlings from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the ex | Todd had the highest herbivore damage rating cited in the page (4.8) and is part of the significant variation in herbivore damage among plum | cultivar 1499 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | Of the plums germinated in the greenhouse, replications ... from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). | Gracious was among greenhouse-replications that produced one or more root suckers (Table 9). | cultivar 1494 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | ... from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). ... There were < 4 replications from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', and 'Whittake | Monitor was among the cultivars with root suckers in greenhouse replications. | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | Of the plums germinated in the greenhouse, replications of seedlings from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). Five replication | South Dakota had high root-sucker incidence in greenhouse replications, with five replications producing the most root suckers and a pooled | cultivar 1405 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | For plum seedlings started in the field, cultivar had a significant effect on ATCA (p<0.001) with average ATCA ranging from 3.18 mm2 for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 36.89 mm2 for seedlings from 'Whittaker' (Table 7). | Mount Royal is the low end of field ATCA among sampled plum cultivars (3.18 mm2), indicating lower average ATCA relative to Whittaker (36.89 | cultivar 1419 | Open Review parse |
| 49 | description_snippet | Average herbivore damage ratings for plums ranged from 2.7 for seedlings from 'Hazel' to 4.8 for seedlings from 'Todd' (Table 8). ... There was significant variation among plums for average herbivore damage rating with s | Hazel had the lowest cited average herbivore damage rating (2.7). | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 50 | description_snippet | Replications from Hazel and South Dakota, and single replications from Compass, Gracious, Monitor, and Whittaker (Table 9). | Hazel is listed among plum entries in Table 9 with multiple replications. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 50 | description_snippet | At the end of Experiment III, % survival among plum seedlings started in the greenhouse ranged from 33% for seedlings from Pipestone to 89% for seedlings from Mount Royal (Table 10). | Greenhouse survival at the end of Experiment III was reported as 33% for Pipestone seedlings (Table 10). | cultivar 146 | Open Review parse |
| 50 | description_snippet | Percent survival among plum seedlings started in the field ranged from 43% for seedlings from Winona to 100% for seedlings from multiple cultivars (Table 10). | Field survival at the end of Experiment III was reported as 43% for Winona seedlings (Table 10). | cultivar 1498 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | taxon_context | Some Prunus species have escaped cultivation and have become invasive in certain parts of the world. For example, P. serotina has become invasive in parts of Europe (Deckers et al. 2005). | Cited as a Prunus species that escaped cultivation and became invasive in parts of Europe. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | description_snippet | Some Prunus species have escaped cultivation and have become invasive in certain parts of the world. For example, P. serotina has become invasive in parts of Europe (Deckers et al. 2005). | Used as an example of documented invasiveness among Prunus species. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | recommendation_context | Some Prunus species have escaped cultivation and have become invasive in certain parts of the world. For example, P. serotina has become invasive in parts of Europe (Deckers et al. 2005). | Serves as evidence that escaped Prunus taxa can act invasively and justify caution in assessing introductions. | cultivar 1473 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | description_snippet | P. americana has also demonstrated high invasive potential as it is adapted to a variety of habitats and spread across a wide geographic range (Francis, 2004). | Noted for high invasive potential and broad habitat adaptation. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | recommendation_context | P. americana has also demonstrated high invasive potential as it is adapted to a variety of habitats and spread across a wide geographic range (Francis, 2004). | Included in comparison of native Prunus species vs. cultivars for invasive-potential framing. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | source_reference_abbreviation | P. americana has also demonstrated high invasive potential as it is adapted to a variety of habitats and spread across a wide geographic range (Francis, 2004). | Referenced as Francis 2004 on invasive potential and wide habitat spread. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | description_snippet | Some plum cultivars like P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and Japanese-American hybrids ‘South | Listed as one of the plum cultivars discussed in germination variability context. | cultivar 1500 | Open Review parse |
| 51 | source_reference_abbreviation | Some plum cultivars like P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and Japanese-American hybrids ‘South | Explicit cultivar mention appears in the thesis discussion section as part of a cultivar list. | cultivar 1500 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | description_snippet | "Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ had high seed germination across both environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | Observed high germination for this cultivar across environments, scarification treatments, and storage conditions on this page. | cultivar 656 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | recommendation_context | "Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ had high seed germination across both environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | The page associates consistently high germination with greater comparative invasive potential. | cultivar 656 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | description_snippet | "In contrast, P. domestica ‘Mount Royal’ ... had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | Germination was variable across environments, scarification methods, and storage for this named plum cultivar. | cultivar 1503 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | anecdote_snippet | "In contrast, P. domestica ‘Mount Royal’ ... had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | Variable germination is contrasted with consistently high-germinating Dakota and Hennepin. | cultivar 1503 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | description_snippet | "Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | Germination pattern was variable across environments, scarification, and storage conditions. | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | recommendation_context | "Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage." | Its variable germination is presented as potentially reducing relative invasiveness versus high-germinating cultivars. | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | source_reference_abbreviation | "According to Grisez et al. (2008), P. cerasus ‘Stevnsbaer Brigitte’ seed did not differ significantly from recently harvested seed after storage." | Grisez et al. 2008 was used as evidence that post-storage germination remained similar to recently harvested seed for this cultivar. | cultivar 1504 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | description_snippet | "According to Grisez et al. (2008), P. cerasus ‘Stevnsbaer Brigitte’ seed did not differ significantly from recently harvested seed after storage." | Reference is used to support storage resilience of this cultivar’s seeds. | cultivar 1504 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | description_snippet | "In comparison to native species, cultivars with higher % germination across environments could potentially become invasive... Observed low % germination among tart cherry cultivars... Inbreeding depression could potenti | Tart cherry cultivars generally showed lower germination in this study context, but germination still occurred for some entries. | cultivar 1505 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | entry_pedigree | "In comparison to native species, cultivars with higher % germination across environments could potentially become invasive... Observed low % germination among tart cherry cultivars... Inbreeding depression could potenti | Inbreeding depression is proposed as a potential explanatory mechanism for reduced germination in tart cherry progeny. | cultivar 1505 | Open Review parse |
| 52 | anecdote_snippet | "In comparison to native species, cultivars with higher % germination across environments could potentially become invasive... Observed low % germination among tart cherry cultivars... Inbreeding depression could potenti | The text suggests birds may consume or damage tart cherry fruits, linking fruiting to potential dispersal and spread. | cultivar 1505 | Open Review parse |
| 53 | storage_duration | Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) concluded that germination of P. cerasus ‘Stevnsbaer Brigitte’ seed did not differ significantly from recently harvested seed. | Seed viability/ germination for this cultivar was not significantly lower than recently harvested seed under the reported storage comparison | cultivar 1504 | Open Review parse |
| 53 | description_snippet | Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) concluded that germination of P. cerasus ‘Stevnsbaer Brigitte’ seed did not differ significantly from recently harvested seed. | Cited in the context of seed storage and germination experiments as evidence that storage did not reduce this cherry cultivar’s germination | cultivar 1504 | Open Review parse |
| 53 | source_reference_abbreviation | Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) concluded that germination of P. cerasus ‘Stevnsbaer Brigitte’ seed did not differ significantly from recently harvested seed. | Reference: Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) on Prunus cerasus ‘Stevnsbaer Brigitte’ seed viability versus fresh seed. | cultivar 1504 | Open Review parse |
| 53 | storage_duration | Grisez et al. (2008) reported that after 18 months in storage at 7-10°C, P. americana seed had 70% germination. | Reported germination after 18 months at 7–10°Cwas 70% for P. americana seed. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 53 | source_reference_abbreviation | Grisez et al. (2008) reported that after 18 months in storage at 7-10°C, P. americana seed had 70% germination. | Reference: Grisez et al. (2008) for Prunus americana seed storage outcome. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 53 | description_snippet | Grisez et al. (2008) reported that after 18 months in storage at 7-10°C, P. americana seed had 70% germination. | Used as an external comparative datum in the section discussing how storage duration affects stone fruit seed germination. | cultivar 1474 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | anecdote_snippet | Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) observed greater percent seed germination for P. cerasus seeds with the endocarp removed. | For P. cerasus, cited work reports higher germination when the endocarp is removed, suggesting endocarp restriction is a meaningful dormancy | cultivar 1476 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | source_reference_abbreviation | Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) observed greater percent seed germination for P. cerasus seeds with the endocarp removed. | Reference to Kristiansen and Jenson (2009) as comparative evidence for improved P. cerasus germination after endocarp removal. | cultivar 1476 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | anecdote_snippet | Grisez et al. (2008) reported that after 90 days of cold stratification, P. armeniaca seeds achieved 95% germination with an intact endocarp. | For P. armeniaca, cited results indicate 95% germination after 90 days of cold stratification even with intact endocarp. | cultivar 1484 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | source_reference_abbreviation | Grisez et al. (2008) reported that after 90 days of cold stratification, P. armeniaca seeds achieved 95% germination with an intact endocarp. | Reference to Grisez et al. (2008) for comparison against endocarp-removal scarification effects in the broader discussion. | cultivar 1484 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | anecdote_snippet | McMahon et al. (2015) observed no significant difference for percent germination between non-scarified and scarified P. angustifolia seed. | For P. angustifolia, cited literature suggests scarification did not significantly alter percent germination, and lower germination may rela | cultivar 1479 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | source_reference_abbreviation | McMahon et al. (2015) observed no significant difference for percent germination between non-scarified and scarified P. angustifolia seed. | Reference to McMahon et al. (2015) within the comparison of scarification treatment responses. | cultivar 1479 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | entry_pedigree | field experiments, the soil at a 10.2 cm depth oscillated above and below 0°C (Table 2); in most cultivars there was no significant difference in germination timing between non- and scarified seed in greenhouse environme | Field soil temperature cycling around freezing at depth suggests natural freeze-thaw may crack endocarp in situ. | cultivar 1506 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | entry_hardiness_observation | field experiments, the soil at a 10.2 cm depth oscillated above and below 0°C (Table 2); in most cultivars there was no significant difference in germination timing between non- and scarified seed in greenhouse environme | Combining warm and cold stratification may be sufficient to overcome dormancy for many tested Prunus materials, reducing the need for scarif | cultivar 1506 | Open Review parse |
| 54 | fruit_size | field experiments, the soil at a 10.2 cm depth oscillated above and below 0°C (Table 2); in most cultivars there was no significant difference in germination timing between non- and scarified seed in greenhouse environme | The page text does not provide size/color/productivity traits; evidence is limited to germination behavior. | cultivar 1506 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | description_snippet | Seedlings from cultivars P. domestica ‘Mount Royal’, and ‘Todd’, and Prunus spp. ‘Winona’ had low to moderate seedling survival, high herbivore damage, low changes in diameter and ∆TCA, and low numbers of root suckers. | Low to moderate seedling survival with high herbivore damage and low change in stem diameter/∆TCA on this page’s data. | cultivar 1503 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | anecdote_snippet | Seedlings from cultivars P. domestica ‘Mount Royal’, and ‘Todd’, and Prunus spp. ‘Winona’ had low to moderate seedling survival, high herbivore damage, low changes in diameter and ∆TCA, and low numbers of root suckers. | Mount Royal is grouped with plum entries interpreted as having relatively low likelihood of invasiveness versus certain U.S. plum/hybrid lin | cultivar 1503 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | entry_hardiness_observation | Seedlings from cultivars P. domestica ‘Mount Royal’, and ‘Todd’, and Prunus spp. ‘Winona’ had low to moderate seedling survival, high herbivore damage, low changes in diameter and ∆TCA, and low numbers of root suckers. | Lower changes in stem diameter and ∆TCA are linked here to lower vigor and lower establishment potential relative to better-performing plum | cultivar 1507 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | description_snippet | In contrast, P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and hybrids Prunus spp. ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ had moderate changes in diameter and ∆TCA, low to moderate herbivore damage, and some seedlings produced | Hazel showed moderate changes in diameter and ∆TCA with low to moderate herbivore damage and some root-sucker production. | cultivar 1500 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | anecdote_snippet | In contrast, P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and hybrids Prunus spp. ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ had moderate changes in diameter and ∆TCA, low to moderate herbivore damage, and some seedlings produced | The page infers this line has a higher likelihood of becoming invasive than some P. domestica cultivars. | cultivar 1500 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | hardiness_code_expansion | In contrast, P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and hybrids Prunus spp. ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ had moderate changes in diameter and ∆TCA, low to moderate herbivore damage, and some seedlings produced | Page-level inference indicates higher invasiveness potential for P. munsoniana lines compared with some P. domestica cultivars in this datas | cultivar 1501 | Open Review parse |
| 58 | entry_hardiness_observation | In contrast, P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and hybrids Prunus spp. ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ had moderate changes in diameter and ∆TCA, low to moderate herbivore damage, and some seedlings produced | This entry is included among those interpreted as having increased likelihood of becoming invasive in this study context. | cultivar 1509 | Open Review parse |
| 60 | anecdote_snippet | one replication of seedlings from ‘Northstar’ produced five root suckers after being damaged by herbivores | ‘Northstar’ seedlings produced five root suckers in one replication following herbivore damage. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 60 | entry_hardiness_observation | one replication of seedlings from ‘Northstar’ produced five root suckers after being damaged by herbivores | Herbivore-induced vegetative propagation in ‘Northstar’ is discussed as a potential trait affecting invasive spread under repeated apical da | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 60 | description_snippet | Seedlings from some tart cherry cultivars, P. munsoniana, and some hybrid plums produced root suckers. | P. munsoniana seedlings were observed among types that produced root suckers. | cultivar 1511 | Open Review parse |
| 60 | anecdote_snippet | Seedlings from some tart cherry cultivars, P. munsoniana, and some hybrid plums produced root suckers. | The page associates P. munsoniana with vegetative propagation via suckering in the context of potential spread after browsing. | cultivar 1511 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | productivity | According to Brooks and Olmo (1997) tart cherry cultivars like ‘Northstar’ and ‘Meteor’ tend to be productive and bear regularly. | Named as a productive tart cherry cultivar with regular bearing according to Brooks and Olmo (1997). | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | anecdote_snippet | According to Brooks and Olmo (1997) tart cherry cultivars like ‘Northstar’ and ‘Meteor’ tend to be productive and bear regularly. | The cultivar is used as an example of tart cherries that may contribute high propagule loads if planted broadly because of reliable yield, d | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | source_reference_abbreviation | According to Brooks and Olmo (1997) tart cherry cultivars like ‘Northstar’ and ‘Meteor’ tend to be productive and bear regularly. | Brooks and Olmo (1997) source is cited for production and bearing behavior of Northstar. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | productivity | On average, a 10 to 20 year old tart cherry tree ('Montmorency') produces 36 kg to 45 kg (Me-Nsope, 2009). Even with relatively low germination, high fruit yields could result in large numbers of propagule units and thus | Reported yield estimate: approximately 36–45 kg per year for 10–20-year-old trees. | cultivar 170 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | anecdote_snippet | On average, a 10 to 20 year old tart cherry tree ('Montmorency') produces 36 kg to 45 kg (Me-Nsope, 2009). Even with relatively low germination, high fruit yields could result in large numbers of propagule units and thus | High long-term yield is presented as a factor that can offset low germination by increasing propagule units. | cultivar 170 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | source_reference_abbreviation | On average, a 10 to 20 year old tart cherry tree ('Montmorency') produces 36 kg to 45 kg (Me-Nsope, 2009). Even with relatively low germination, high fruit yields could result in large numbers of propagule units and thus | Yield estimate attributed to Me-Nsope (2009). | cultivar 170 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | entry_hardiness_observation | Progeny from the plum cultivars P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and the hybrids ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ exhibited high germination, vigorous growth, moderate to low herbivore pressure, and produced | High seed germination was observed in progeny from this plum cultivar within the trial. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | growth_habit | Progeny from the plum cultivars P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and the hybrids ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ exhibited high germination, vigorous growth, moderate to low herbivore pressure, and produced | Progeny showed vigorous growth. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | anecdote_snippet | Progeny from the plum cultivars P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and the hybrids ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ exhibited high germination, vigorous growth, moderate to low herbivore pressure, and produced | Moderate to low herbivore pressure was recorded, and root suckers were produced, which is interpreted as increasing establishment potential. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | recommendation_context | Progeny from the plum cultivars P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and the hybrids ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ exhibited high germination, vigorous growth, moderate to low herbivore pressure, and produced | The trait combination is presented as indicating potential to become invasive. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 61 | description_snippet | Progeny from the plum cultivars P. americana ‘Hazel’, P. munsoniana ‘Whittaker’, and the hybrids ‘South Dakota’ and ‘Hennepin’ exhibited high germination, vigorous growth, moderate to low herbivore pressure, and produced | Recorded with moderate to low herbivore pressure and some root suckers. | cultivar 1405 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_pedigree | Apricot P. armeniaca L. 'Debbie's Gold' HRC x 8 7 | Listed as Apricot cultivar Debbie's Gold of species Prunus armeniaca L. | cultivar 1488 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_location | Apricot P. armeniaca L. 'Debbie's Gold' HRC x 8 7 | Collection/source code is HRC for this entry. | cultivar 1488 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | source_reference_abbreviation | Apricot P. armeniaca L. 'Debbie's Gold' HRC x 8 7 | HRC is expanded in the table header as the University of Minnesota research plots in Excelsior, MN. | cultivar 1488 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | description_snippet | Apricot P. armeniaca L. 'Debbie's Gold' HRC x 8 7 | Table row includes Experiment III replication counts in two numeric columns shown as 8 and 7 (greenhouse and field columns). | cultivar 1488 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_pedigree | Apricot ... P. armeniaca L. MN203 HRC x - - | Entry MN203 appears under Prunus armeniaca (Apricot) in the table of germplasm. | cultivar 1489 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_location | Apricot ... P. armeniaca L. MN203 HRC x - - | Collection/source code is HRC. | cultivar 1489 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | source_reference_abbreviation | Apricot ... P. armeniaca L. MN203 HRC x - - | HRC corresponds to the University of Minnesota research plots in Excelsior, MN. | cultivar 1489 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_pedigree | Apricot ... 'Moongold' HRC x x 8 8 | Listed as cultivar Moongold of Prunus armeniaca L. (Apricot). | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_location | Apricot ... 'Moongold' HRC x x 8 8 | Collection/source code is HRC. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | description_snippet | Apricot ... 'Moongold' HRC x x 8 8 | Row indicates seed collection flags and Experiment III replication values corresponding to two numbers, read as greenhouse 8 and field 8. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | source_reference_abbreviation | Apricot ... 'Moongold' HRC x x 8 8 | HRC = University of Minnesota research plots in Excelsior, MN. | cultivar 173 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_pedigree | Apricot ... 'Sungold' HRC x x 8 13 | Listed as cultivar Sungold of species Prunus armeniaca L. (Apricot). | cultivar 1469 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_location | Apricot ... 'Sungold' HRC x x 8 13 | Collection/source code is HRC. | cultivar 1469 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | description_snippet | Apricot ... 'Sungold' HRC x x 8 13 | Experiment III greenhouse/field replication values shown as 8 and 13 in the row. | cultivar 1469 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_pedigree | Apricot ... 'Westcot' HRC x x 15 10 | Listed as cultivar Westcot of Prunus armeniaca L. (Apricot). | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_location | Apricot ... 'Westcot' HRC x x 15 10 | Collection/source code is HRC. | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | description_snippet | Apricot ... 'Westcot' HRC x x 15 10 | Experiment III replication values in the row are shown as 15 and 10. | cultivar 1487 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_pedigree | Tart Cherry P. cerasus L. 'Bali' HRC x 12 8 | Listed as cultivar Bali of Tart Cherry, species Prunus cerasus L. | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | entry_location | Tart Cherry P. cerasus L. 'Bali' HRC x 12 8 | Collection/source code is HRC. | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | description_snippet | Tart Cherry P. cerasus L. 'Bali' HRC x 12 8 | Experiment III replication values in this row read as 12 and 8. | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 70 | source_reference_abbreviation | Tart Cherry P. cerasus L. 'Bali' HRC x 12 8 | HRC expanded as the University of Minnesota research plots in Excelsior, MN. | cultivar 1490 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | Tart Cherry P. cerasus "Mesabi' HRC x - - | This cultivar is listed as a Table 1 entry under Tart Cherry (Prunus cerasus) with collection location HRC. | cultivar 1512 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | Tart Cherry P. cerasus "Mesabi' HRC x - - | Row text shows seed-year markers as 'x' for 2012 and '-' for 2013 and 2014. | cultivar 1512 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | entry_location | Tart Cherry P. cerasus "Mesabi' HRC x - - | Collection location field is HRC. | cultivar 1512 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | "Meteor' HRC x x 10 7 | This tart cherry entry is located in HRC for collection metadata. | cultivar 1471 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | "Meteor' HRC x x 10 7 | Year markers appear as two 'x' values and greenhouse/field replication values are 10 and 7. | cultivar 1471 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | entry_location | N81755 HRC Xx x 13 10 | Collection location is HRC. | cultivar 1493 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | N81755 HRC Xx x 13 10 | Table row includes collection-year markers rendered as Xx/x (OCR indicates an 'x'-style value pattern) with greenhouse and field replication | cultivar 1493 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | ‘Northstar’ Saint Paul, MN x xX 11 3 | Collection location for this row is Saint Paul, MN. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | ‘Northstar’ Saint Paul, MN x xX 11 3 | Seed-year marker fields display as x x, and greenhouse/field replication values read as 11 and 3. | cultivar 1470 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | “Suda! HRC Xx x 10 10 | Collection location is HRC. | cultivar 1491 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | “Suda! HRC Xx x 10 10 | Collection-year area appears as an x/x pattern with greenhouse and field counts recorded as 10 and 10. | cultivar 1491 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | taxon_context | Plum P. americana L. ‘Hazel’ HRC x x 12 14 | Species context is P. americana L. within the plum section. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | Plum P. americana L. ‘Hazel’ HRC x x 12 14 | Collection location is HRC. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | Plum P. americana L. ‘Hazel’ HRC x x 12 14 | Collection-year values are marked with x in the first two year columns; greenhouse and field replications are 12 and 14. | cultivar 1403 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | entry_pedigree | P. besseyi x P. hortulana L. ‘Compass’ HRC x x 11 9 | Species column explicitly lists an interspecific cross: P. besseyi x P. hortulana. | cultivar 394 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | P. besseyi x P. hortulana L. ‘Compass’ HRC x x 11 9 | Collection location is HRC. | cultivar 394 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | P. besseyi x P. hortulana L. ‘Compass’ HRC x x 11 9 | Seed-year row shows x markers and replication counts 11 (greenhouse) and 9 (field). | cultivar 394 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | selection_origin_reference | P. domestica L. ‘Mount Royal' HRC & UMN x x 7 5 | Collection locations are listed as HRC and UMN. | cultivar 1419 | Open Review parse |
| 71 | description_snippet | P. domestica L. ‘Mount Royal' HRC & UMN x x 7 5 | Seed-year year columns show x values, with greenhouse/field replications of 7 and 5. | cultivar 1419 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | taxon_context | P. munsoniana Wright and Hedrick 'Whittaker' HRC x x 16 17 | Species is Prunus munsoniana (Wright and Hedrick). | cultivar 1501 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_pedigree | P. munsoniana Wright and Hedrick 'Whittaker' HRC x x 16 17 | Cultivar name is Whittaker. | cultivar 1501 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_location | P. munsoniana Wright and Hedrick 'Whittaker' HRC x x 16 17 | Collection/source marker indicates HRC and a second x marker before replication counts. | cultivar 1501 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | taxon_context | P. nigra Aiton 'Bounty' HRC x x 7 5 | Species is Prunus nigra Aiton. | cultivar 1513 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_pedigree | P. nigra Aiton 'Bounty' HRC x x 7 5 | Cultivar is Bounty. | cultivar 1513 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | taxon_context | Prunus spp. L. 'Alderman' HRC x x 14 12 | Species is identified as Prunus spp. L. (species-level not specified in row). | cultivar 1514 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_pedigree | Prunus spp. L. 'Alderman' HRC x x 14 12 | Cultivar is Alderman. | cultivar 1514 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_location | Prunus spp. L. 'Alderman' HRC x x 14 12 | Collection/source includes HRC; row includes secondary x marker and replication-like values 14 and 12. | cultivar 1514 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | taxon_context | 'Gracious' HRC x x 16 16 | Species label is not explicitly printed on this line; nearest-context row indicates Prunus spp. category. | cultivar 1515 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_pedigree | 'Gracious' HRC x x 16 16 | Cultivar is Gracious. | cultivar 1515 | Open Review parse |
| 72 | entry_location | 'Gracious' HRC x x 16 16 | Row shows HRC and final two values as 16 and 16, with an x marker before them. | cultivar 1515 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | Prunus spp. Hennepin HRC x x 13 2 | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 1409 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | Prunus spp. Hennepin HRC x x 13 2 | The row shows table data for Hennepin with sequence 'HRC x x 13 2' in the row's year/replication columns. | cultivar 1409 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | La Crescent HRC x - - | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 1397 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | La Crescent HRC x - - | The row is captured as 'La Crescent HRC x - -', with limited year/replication values shown beyond the collection source. | cultivar 1397 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | MNS98 HRC x - - | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 1516 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | MNS98 HRC x - - | The row appears as 'MNS98 HRC x - -'; OCR confidence is lower than other entries and token may potentially represent MN598. | cultivar 1516 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | Monitor HRC x x 13 2 | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | Monitor HRC x x 13 2 | The row is captured as 'Monitor HRC x x 13 2'. | cultivar 143 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | Pipestone HRC x x 6 4 | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 146 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | Pipestone HRC x x 6 4 | The row is captured as 'Pipestone HRC x x 6 4'. | cultivar 146 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | Redcoat HRC x x - - | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 290 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | Redcoat HRC x x - - | The row is captured as 'Redcoat HRC x x - -'. | cultivar 290 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | South Dakota HRC x x 16 15 | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 1405 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | South Dakota HRC x x 16 15 | The row is captured as 'South Dakota HRC x x 16 15'. | cultivar 1405 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | Superior HRC x - - | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 140 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | Superior HRC x - - | The row is captured as 'Superior HRC x - -'. | cultivar 140 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | entry_location | Toka HRC x - - | Collection/source field on this row is HRC. | cultivar 157 | Open Review parse |
| 73 | description_snippet | Toka HRC x - - | The row is captured as 'Toka HRC x - -'. | cultivar 157 | Open Review parse |
| 74 | entry_location | Plum Prunus spp. 'Underwood' HRC x - - | Collection location on this row is HRC. | cultivar 142 | Open Review parse |
| 74 | taxon_context | Plum Prunus spp. 'Underwood' HRC x - - | Fruit type is Plum and taxon is Prunus spp. | cultivar 142 | Open Review parse |
| 74 | description_snippet | Plum Prunus spp. 'Underwood' HRC x - - | Row data includes marks 'x - -' in the year/replication columns after HRC. | cultivar 142 | Open Review parse |
| 74 | entry_location | Plum Prunus spp. 'Winona' HRC x x 6 7 | Collection location on this row is HRC. | cultivar 1498 | Open Review parse |
| 74 | taxon_context | Plum Prunus spp. 'Winona' HRC x x 6 7 | Fruit type is Plum and taxon is Prunus spp. | cultivar 1498 | Open Review parse |
| 74 | description_snippet | Plum Prunus spp. 'Winona' HRC x x 6 7 | Row data includes symbols after HRC in the pattern 'x x 6 7'. | cultivar 1498 | Open Review parse |
| 77 | description_snippet | Apricot "Moongold" 100.0 a 83.3 20.8 b 2.0 a 1.0 | In Table 3 for Experiment I, Apricot 'Moongold' reports non-scarified greenhouse germination of 100.0% and scarified greenhouse germination | cultivar 1517 | Open Review parse |
| 77 | description_snippet | ‘Sungold' 83.3 a 66.7 66.7 a 0.7 b 0.5 | In Table 3 for Experiment I, Apricot 'Sungold' reports non-scarified greenhouse germination of 83.3% and scarified greenhouse germination of | cultivar 1518 | Open Review parse |
| 78 | description_snippet | Apricot 'Westcot' | Avg. % Germ. Non-Scarified 33.3 (b), Scarified 58.3 ; Germination Field 25.0 (b); Avg. # of Weeks for Germ: Non-Scarified 0.6 (b), Scarified 0.4 | In Table 3 (continued), Apricot 'Westcot' is reported with non-scarified germination 33.3 and scarified germination 58.3 in greenhouse condi | cultivar 1519 | Open Review parse |
Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.
| ID | Cultivar | Evidence / Claims | Relationships | History / Pages | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1470 | Northstar | 37 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 173 | Moongold | 33 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 143 | Monitor | 31 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1419 | Mount Royal | 31 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1469 | Sungold | 31 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1405 | South Dakota | 30 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1471 | Meteor | 29 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1403 | Hazel | 28 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1487 | Westcot | 27 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 394 | Compass | 26 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1475 | Whittaker | 26 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1409 | Hennepin | 25 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1490 | Bali | 25 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1491 | Suda | 25 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1494 | Gracious | 24 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1472 | Alderman | 23 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 140 | Superior | 20 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1397 | La Crescent | 20 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 157 | Toka | 19 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1488 | Debbie'S Gold | 18 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1493 | Nbi755 | 16 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1498 | Winona | 16 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1499 | Todd | 16 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1489 | Mnzo3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 142 | Underwood | 13 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 146 | Pipestone | 12 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1474 | Prunus Americana | 12 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1473 | Prunus Serotina | 11 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1512 | Mesabi | 9 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1501 | Prunus Munsoniana 'Whittaker' | 8 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1549 | Surecrop | 8 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1492 | Nb7155 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 170 | Montmorency | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1504 | Prunus Cerasus 'Stevnsbaer Brigitte' | 5 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 257 | Pioneer | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 290 | Redcoat | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1476 | Prunus Cerasus | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1479 | Prunus Angustifolia | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1500 | Prunus Americana 'Hazel' | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1503 | Prunus Domestica 'Mount Royal' | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1506 | Prunus Spp | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1509 | Prunus Spp 'South Dakota' | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1516 | Mns98 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1484 | Prunus Armeniaca | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1505 | Tart Cherry Cultivars | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1508 | Prunus Spp 'Winona' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1510 | Prunus Spp 'Hennepin' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1513 | Prunus Nigra 'Bounty' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1514 | Prunus Spp 'Alderman' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1515 | Prunus Spp 'Gracious' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1517 | Apricot 'Moongold' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1518 | Apricot 'Sungold' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1531 | Plum 'Whittaker' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1537 | Plum 'Monitor' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1538 | Plum 'South Dakota' | 3 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 656 | Dakota | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1478 | Prunus Domestica | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1485 | Prunus Persica Batsch | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1497 | Tecomseh | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1502 | Japanese-American Hybrid 'South Dakota' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1507 | Prunus Domestica 'Todd' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1511 | Prunus Munsoniana | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1519 | Apricot 'Westcot' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1520 | Tart Cherry 'Bali' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1525 | Plum 'Hazel' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1526 | Plum 'Compass' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1527 | Plum 'Mount Royal' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1528 | Plum 'Opal' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1529 | Plum 'Stanley' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1530 | Plum 'Todd' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1532 | Plum 'Bounty' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1533 | Plum 'Alderman' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1534 | Plum 'Gracious' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1535 | Prunus Spp 'Monitor' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1536 | Prunus Spp 'Pipestone' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1539 | Plum 'Hennepin' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1540 | Plum 'Pipestone' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1541 | Plum 'Winona' | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1548 | P. Nigra | 2 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1477 | Prunus Persica | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1480 | Prunus Cerasifera | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1481 | Prunus Spinosa | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1482 | Prunus Virginiana | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1483 | Prunus Campanulata | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1486 | Prunus Angustifolia Marsh | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1495 | Opal | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1496 | Stanley | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1521 | Tart Cherry 'Mesabi' | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1522 | Tart Cherry 'Meteor' | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1523 | Tart Cherry 'Nbi755' | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1524 | Tart Cherry 'Suda' | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1542 | P. Armeniaca | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1543 | P. Cerasus | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1544 | P. Americana | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1545 | P. Besseyi X. Prunus Spp | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1546 | P. Domestica | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1547 | P. Munsoniana | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| 1550 | Kutahya | 1 | 0 | 0 | Open cultivar |
| parsed only | 'Alderman' | 9 | 0 | 84, 86, 88, 97, 122 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Gracious' | 9 | 0 | 84, 86, 88, 97, 122 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Northstar' | 9 | 0 | 30, 85, 90, 97, 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Compass' | 8 | 0 | 86, 88, 97, 122 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Monitor' | 8 | 0 | 84, 86, 88, 122 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Moongold' | 7 | 0 | 82, 85, 90, 97, 120 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Mount Royal' | 7 | 0 | 86, 88, 97, 123 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Suda' | 7 | 0 | 85, 88, 97, 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Sungold' | 7 | 0 | 82, 85, 90, 97, 120 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Westcot' | 7 | 0 | 82, 85, 90, 97, 120 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Winona' | 7 | 0 | 81, 84, 86 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Bali' | 6 | 0 | 85, 90, 97, 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Debbie'S Gold' | 6 | 0 | 82, 85, 97 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Hazel' | 6 | 0 | 86, 88, 97 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Hennepin' | 6 | 0 | 84, 86, 88 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Meteor' | 6 | 0 | 85, 90, 97, 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Toka' | 6 | 0 | 119, 123 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Underwood' | 6 | 0 | 119, 123 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Whittaker' | 6 | 0 | 86, 88, 97 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'South Dakota' | 5 | 0 | 84, 86, 123 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Todd' | 5 | 0 | 86, 88, 97 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Pipestone' | 4 | 0 | 84, 86 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | P. domestica 'Opal' | 3 | 0 | 72 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | P. domestica 'Stanley' | 3 | 0 | 72 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | P. domestica 'Todd' | 3 | 0 | 72 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Debbie’S Gold' | 2 | 0 | 90 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'La Crescent' | 2 | 0 | 122 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Mesabi' | 2 | 0 | 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Nbi755' | 2 | 0 | 121 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Surecrop' | 2 | 0 | 122 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Prunus virginiana L | 2 | 0 | 55 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | ‘Monitor’ | 2 | 0 | 52 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | ‘Montmorency’ | 2 | 0 | 13 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Pioneer' | 1 | 0 | 120 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | 'Superior' | 1 | 0 | 123 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Prunus cerasus L | 1 | 0 | 28 | No staging cultivar page yet |
| parsed only | Prunus domestica L | 1 | 0 | 28 | No staging cultivar page yet |
Relationships: 0
History events: 24
These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.
| Status | License | Holder |
|---|---|---|
| unknown |
| Tier | Score | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| tier_1 | 88 | auto | Academic institutional domain |
| Source Lang | Target Lang | Method | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation records. | ||||
| Translation ID | Score | Risk | Assessor | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No translation assessments. | ||||
| Status | Visibility | Reviewer | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| No publication records. | |||
| Type | Value | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| taxon_keyword | prunus | 0.75 |
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | From public gardens to homeowners, Prunus species provide a multitude of options for ornamental use. | 0.54 |
| description_snippet | avium L.) and tart (P. | 0.54 |
| ornamental_use | ornamental use | 0.56 |
| culinary_use | jelly and dried fruit | 0.56 |
| storage_duration | storage………………………………………………………………………111 | 0.56 |
| storage_duration | storage……………………………………………………………………………………73 | 0.56 |
| storage_duration | storage on pollen viability in winter-hardy | 0.56 |
| selection_origin_reference | western Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P | 0.57 |
| selection_origin_reference | Europe to North America to | 0.57 |
| selection_origin_reference | China not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al | 0.57 |
| release_year_reference | 2015 | 0.68 |
| breeding_cross | germination in the field environments of E x periments I or II | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | germination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | Greenhouse environment of E x periment I | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | environments of E x periment I | 0.65 |
| breeding_cross | and cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I | 0.65 |
| year_reference | 2004 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 1996 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2013 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 1993 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2001 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2008 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2012 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 1994 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2011 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2015 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2014 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 1926 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2009 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 1941 | 0.55 |
| year_reference | 2016 | 0.55 |