Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits

Document 112

Title: Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits

Source URL: https://sherwoods-forests.com/Downloads/UMinnAgExpStation-Stone_Fruit-Pollenation.pdf

Archive provenance: manual stone fruit pollination pilot import | source_site=Sherwoods Forests | institution=University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station | local_archive=/usr/local/var/www/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/stone_fruit_pollination_pilot/UMinnAgExpStation-Stone_Fruit-Pollenation.pdf

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 400

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 4

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station

Publisher: University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station

Site: Sherwoods Forests

Year: 1951

Page count: 9

Type: technical bulletin

Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1

Relationship Records

ID	Relation	Source	Target	Source Doc
398	pollinizer_good_for	Compass	Convoy	112
397	pollinizer_good_for	Sapalta	Convoy	112
396	pollinizer_good_for	Sapa	Convoy	112
395	pollinizer_poor_for	Opata	Convoy	112
394	pollinizer_fair_for	Oka	Convoy	112
393	pollinizer_fair_for	Manor	Convoy	112
392	pollinizer_good_for	Compass	Sapalta	112
391	pollinizer_good_for	Convoy	Sapalta	112
390	pollinizer_poor_for	Sapa	Sapalta	112
389	pollinizer_good_for	Opata	Sapalta	112
388	pollinizer_good_for	Oka	Sapalta	112
387	pollinizer_poor_for	Manor	Sapalta	112
386	pollinizer_good_for	Compass	Opata	112
385	pollinizer_good_for	Convoy	Opata	112
384	pollinizer_good_for	Sapalta	Opata	112
383	pollinizer_good_for	Sapa	Opata	112
382	pollinizer_good_for	Oka	Opata	112
381	pollinizer_good_for	Manor	Opata	112
380	pollinizer_good_for	Convoy	Oka	112
379	pollinizer_good_for	Sapa	Oka	112
378	pollinizer_good_for	Opata	Oka	112
377	pollinizer_good_for	Compass	Manor	112
376	pollinizer_good_for	Convoy	Manor	112
375	pollinizer_good_for	Sapalta	Manor	112
374	pollinizer_good_for	Sapa	Manor	112
373	pollinizer_fair_for	Opata	Manor	112
372	pollinizer_good_for	Oka	Manor	112
371	pollinizer_good_for	Zumbra	Sapa	112
370	pollinizer_good_for	Wachampa	Sapa	112
369	pollinizer_poor_for	Sapalta	Sapa	112
368	pollinizer_good_for	Opata	Sapa	112
367	pollinizer_fair_for	Oka	Sapa	112
366	pollinizer_good_for	Nicollet	Sapa	112
365	pollinizer_good_for	Manor	Sapa	112
364	pollinizer_good_for	Dura	Sapa	112
363	pollinizer_good_for	Convoy	Sapa	112
362	pollinizer_good_for	Compass	Sapa	112
361	mentioned_in_document	Farm	Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits	112
360	mentioned_in_document	Weir Fruit Breeding Farm	Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits	112
359	mentioned_in_document	University Of Minnesota	Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits	112

History Records

ID	Type	Year	Label
786	year_reference	1930	Year reference 1930
788	year_reference	1931	Year reference 1931
787	year_reference	1932	Year reference 1932
785	year_reference	1951	Year reference 1951
789	institution_mention	1951	University Of Minnesota
790	nursery_mention	1951	Weir Fruit Breeding Farm
791	nursery_mention	1951	Farm

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

1 additional parsed name from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Select a linked cultivar to inspect the raw parsed details from this document beside the source PDF.

Citation focus: page focus: 4 | quote focus: Redglow 10 Medium P. salicina x P. Munsoniana

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

Page	Type	Quote	Claim	Entity	Jump
3	entry_pedigree	Elliot — P. salicina hybrid	Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid.	cultivar 141	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	Elliot — P. salicina hybrid	Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.	cultivar 141	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	La Crescent — P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina hybrid x P. americana.	cultivar 1397	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	La Crescent — P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.	cultivar 1397	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Monitor — P. salicina hybrid	Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid.	cultivar 143	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	Monitor — P. salicina hybrid	Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.	cultivar 143	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Red Wing — P. salicina x P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina x P. americana.	cultivar 1144	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	Red Wing — P. salicina x P. americana	Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.	cultivar 1144	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Tom Thumb — P. Besseyi hybrid	Listed in Table 2 as a P. Besseyi hybrid.	cultivar 1398	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	Tom Thumb — P. Besseyi hybrid	Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.	cultivar 1398	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Underwood — P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina hybrid x P. americana.	cultivar 142	Open Review parse
3	description_snippet	Underwood — P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Placed among varieties showing very low pollen germination in Table 2.	cultivar 142	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Fiebing — P. salicina hybrid	Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid.	cultivar 149	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Radisson — P. salicina hybrid	Listed in Table 2 as a P. salicina hybrid.	cultivar 148	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Superior — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)	Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii).	cultivar 140	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	Superior — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)	Among the hybrids mentioned in Table 2, only Superior proved to have any value as a pollinizer.	cultivar 140	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 195 — P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)	Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii).	cultivar 1399	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Assiniboine — P. nigra	Listed in Table 2 as P. nigra.	cultivar 165	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	Assiniboine — P. nigra	Native varieties proved to be good pollinizers for hybrid plums that bloomed at the same time.	cultivar 165	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	De Soto — P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. americana.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	De Soto — P. americana	Native varieties proved to be good pollinizers for hybrid plums that bloomed at the same time.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Nicollet — P. Besseyi hybrid	Listed in Table 2 as a P. Besseyi hybrid.	cultivar 1400	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	Nicollet — P. Besseyi hybrid	Nicollet ranked with the native species in viability and proved to be a fairly good pollinizer.	cultivar 1400	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Rollingstone — P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. americana.	cultivar 452	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	Rollingstone — P. americana	Native varieties proved to be good pollinizers for hybrid plums that bloomed at the same time.	cultivar 452	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Surprise — P. hortulana Minerii	Listed in Table 2 with species designation P. hortulana Minerii.	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Tonka — P. salicina x P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. salicina x P. americana.	cultivar 144	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	Tonka — P. salicina x P. americana	Tonka ranked with the native species in viability, but proved to be a very poor pollinizer.	cultivar 144	Open Review parse
3	entry_pedigree	Wolf — P. americana	Listed in Table 2 as P. americana.	cultivar 458	Open Review parse
3	recommendation_context	Wolf — P. americana	Native varieties proved to be good pollinizers for hybrid plums that bloomed at the same time.	cultivar 458	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Assiniboine 7 Early P. nigra	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 165	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Assiniboine 7 Early P. nigra	Pollinated 7 varieties tested.	cultivar 165	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Assiniboine 7 Early P. nigra	Species/background listed as P. nigra.	cultivar 165	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Compass 2 Very late P. Besseyi x P. hortulana Mineri	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 394	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Compass 2 Very late P. Besseyi x P. hortulana Mineri	Pollinated 2 varieties tested.	cultivar 394	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Compass 2 Very late P. Besseyi x P. hortulana Mineri	Species/background listed as P. besseyi x P. hortulana Mineri.	cultivar 394	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Convoy 3 Late P. Besseyi hybrid	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Convoy 3 Late P. Besseyi hybrid	Pollinated 3 varieties tested.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Convoy 3 Late P. Besseyi hybrid	Species/background listed as P. besseyi hybrid.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	De Soto 15 Late P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	De Soto 15 Late P. americana	Pollinated 15 varieties tested.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	De Soto 15 Late P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Goff 16 Late P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 1402	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Goff 16 Late P. americana	Pollinated 16 varieties tested.	cultivar 1402	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Goff 16 Late P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 1402	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Hazel 14 Medium P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 1403	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Hazel 14 Medium P. americana	Pollinated 14 varieties tested.	cultivar 1403	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Hazel 14 Medium P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 1403	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Kaga 26 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 155	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Kaga 26 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Pollinated 26 varieties tested.	cultivar 155	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Kaga 26 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Species/background listed as P. americana x P. simonii.	cultivar 155	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	New Ulm 12 Late P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 431	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	New Ulm 12 Late P. americana	Pollinated 12 varieties tested.	cultivar 431	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	New Ulm 12 Late P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 431	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Older 18 Medium P. salicina hybrid	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 1404	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Older 18 Medium P. salicina hybrid	Pollinated 18 varieties tested.	cultivar 1404	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Older 18 Medium P. salicina hybrid	Species/background listed as P. salicina hybrid.	cultivar 1404	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Olson 3 Early P. nigra	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 436	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Olson 3 Early P. nigra	Pollinated 3 varieties tested.	cultivar 436	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Olson 3 Early P. nigra	Species/background listed as P. nigra.	cultivar 436	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Rollingstone 12 Late P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 452	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Rollingstone 12 Late P. americana	Pollinated 12 varieties tested.	cultivar 452	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Rollingstone 12 Late P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 452	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	South Dakota 27 Medium late P. americana or P. americana hybrid	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	South Dakota 27 Medium late P. americana or P. americana hybrid	Pollinated 27 varieties tested.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	South Dakota 27 Medium late P. americana or P. americana hybrid	Species/background listed as P. americana or P. americana hybrid.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Surprise 31 Late P. hortulana Mineri	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Surprise 31 Late P. hortulana Mineri	Pollinated 31 varieties tested.	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Surprise 31 Late P. hortulana Mineri	Species/background listed as P. hortulana Mineri.	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Toka 22 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Toka 22 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Pollinated 22 varieties tested.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Toka 22 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Species/background listed as P. americana x P. simonii.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Wolf 13 Late P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 458	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Wolf 13 Late P. americana	Pollinated 13 varieties tested.	cultivar 458	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Wolf 13 Late P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 458	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Wyant 14 Late P. americana	Rated as a good pollinizer in Table 3.	cultivar 163	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Wyant 14 Late P. americana	Pollinated 14 varieties tested.	cultivar 163	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Wyant 14 Late P. americana	Species/background listed as P. americana.	cultivar 163	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Pollinated 24 varieties tested.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Ember 24 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Species/background listed as P. salicina hybrid x P. americana.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Golden Rod 3 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 1406	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Golden Rod 3 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Pollinated 3 varieties tested.	cultivar 1406	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Golden Rod 3 Medium P. salicina hybrid x P. americana	Species/background listed as P. salicina hybrid x P. americana.	cultivar 1406	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Hanska 17 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 156	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Hanska 17 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Pollinated 17 varieties tested.	cultivar 156	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Hanska 17 Early P. americana x P. Simonii	Species/background listed as P. americana x P. simonii.	cultivar 156	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Loring 3 Early P. salicina hybrid	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 1407	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Loring 3 Early P. salicina hybrid	Pollinated 3 varieties tested.	cultivar 1407	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Loring 3 Early P. salicina hybrid	Species/background listed as P. salicina hybrid.	cultivar 1407	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Redglow 10 Medium P. salicina x P. Munsoniana	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 1408	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Redglow 10 Medium P. salicina x P. Munsoniana	Pollinated 10 varieties tested.	cultivar 1408	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Redglow 10 Medium P. salicina x P. Munsoniana	Species/background listed as P. salicina x P. munsoniana.	cultivar 1408	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 140	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)	Pollinated 18 varieties tested.	cultivar 140	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Superior 18 Medium early P. salicina x (P. americana x P. Simonii)	Species/background listed as P. salicina x (P. americana x P. simonii).	cultivar 140	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Shiro 1 Very late P. americana hybrid	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 91	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Shiro 1 Very late P. americana hybrid	Pollinated 1 variety tested.	cultivar 91	Open Review parse
4	taxon_context	Shiro 1 Very late P. americana hybrid	Species/background appears to be listed as P. americana hybrid.	cultivar 91	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Terry 4 P. salicina x P. americana	Rated as a fair pollinizer in Table 4.	cultivar 161	Open Review parse
4	description_snippet	Terry 4 P. salicina x P. americana	Pollinated 4 varieties tested.	cultivar 161	Open Review parse
4	entry_pedigree	Terry 4 P. salicina x P. americana	Species/background listed as P. salicina x P. americana.	cultivar 161	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Anoka	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 524	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Elliot	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 141	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Fiebing	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 149	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Hennepin	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1409	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	La Crescent	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1397	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Monitor	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 143	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Mendota	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1410	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Opata	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 159	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Pembina	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1411	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Pipestone	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 146	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Radisson	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 148	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Redcoat	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 290	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Redwing	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1412	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Sapa	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 158	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	St. Anthony	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1413	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Tecumseh	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 89	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Toka	Table 5 appears to also list Toka among named varieties rated as poor, despite Toka being listed in Table 3 as a good pollinizer elsewhere o	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Underwood	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 142	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Wachampa	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1414	Open Review parse
4	recommendation_context	Wesota	Listed among named varieties in Table 5, pollinizers tested and rated as poor.	cultivar 1415	Open Review parse
5	entry_pedigree	15 Burbank x Kaga ... 24 Burbank x Nine varieties ... 1 Burbank x De Soto	Table 7 groups hybrid pollinizer varieties derived from Burbank used as the female parent with Kaga, De Soto, and nine additional male-paren	cultivar 386	Open Review parse
5	recommendation_context	15 Burbank x Kaga ... 24 Burbank x Nine varieties ... 1 Burbank x De Soto	In the Burbank x Kaga group, 15 varieties were tested and their pollinizer effectiveness was summarized as 4 good, 4 fair, and 7 poor.	cultivar 386	Open Review parse
5	description_snippet	15 Burbank x Kaga ... 24 Burbank x Nine varieties ... 1 Burbank x De Soto	In the broader Burbank x nine-varieties group, 24 derived varieties were summarized as mostly poor pollinizers.	cultivar 386	Open Review parse
5	entry_pedigree	15 Burbank x Kaga ... In 15 of these the male parent is Kaga ... In a cross of P. japonica x Kaga (P. americana x P. Simonii) plum	Kaga appears as the male parent in a 15-variety Burbank-derived group summarized in Table 7.	cultivar 155	Open Review parse
5	taxon_context	15 Burbank x Kaga ... In 15 of these the male parent is Kaga ... In a cross of P. japonica x Kaga (P. americana x P. Simonii) plum	The page identifies Kaga as a P. americana x P. Simonii plum in the discussion of a P. japonica x Kaga cross.	cultivar 155	Open Review parse
5	description_snippet	15 Burbank x Kaga ... In 15 of these the male parent is Kaga ... In a cross of P. japonica x Kaga (P. americana x P. Simonii) plum	The author suggests Kaga with its heritage from P. Simonii may be largely responsible for the high percentage of good pollinizers in the Bur	cultivar 155	Open Review parse
5	entry_pedigree	1 De Soto x Burbank ... 1 Burbank x De Soto	Table 7 includes one tested variety derived from De Soto x Burbank and one from Burbank x De Soto.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
5	description_snippet	1 De Soto x Burbank ... 1 Burbank x De Soto	These reciprocal Burbank and De Soto combinations are treated as separate parental-origin groups in the pollinizer summary table.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
5	entry_pedigree	16 Shiro x Eight varieties ... 4 Three varieties x Shiro	Table 7 summarizes 16 tested varieties derived from Shiro used as the female parent with eight different male parents.	cultivar 91	Open Review parse
5	description_snippet	16 Shiro x Eight varieties ... 4 Three varieties x Shiro	The author notes that in 16 varieties with Shiro as maternal parent, some account may need to be taken of blood pollinizers because Shiro it	cultivar 91	Open Review parse
5	entry_pedigree	2 South Dakota x Two varieties ... 2 Minn. No. 89 x South Dakota	Table 7 includes two tested varieties derived from South Dakota x two varieties and two tested varieties from Minn. No. 89 x South Dakota.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
5	description_snippet	2 South Dakota x Two varieties ... 2 Minn. No. 89 x South Dakota	South Dakota is one of the named parental varieties used to classify hybrid plum pollinizers by origin.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
5	entry_pedigree	2 Minn. No. 89 x South Dakota	Table 7 includes two tested varieties derived from Minn. No. 89 x South Dakota.	cultivar 1416	Open Review parse
5	selection_origin_reference	2 Minn. No. 89 x South Dakota	The name format indicates a numbered Minnesota selection rather than a standard named commercial cultivar.	cultivar 1416	Open Review parse
5	taxon_context	It may be noted that two cherry-plums, Convoy and Sapa, are included among the pollinizers.	Convoy is identified on this page as a cherry-plum.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
5	recommendation_context	It may be noted that two cherry-plums, Convoy and Sapa, are included among the pollinizers.	Convoy is noted as one of the pollinizers included in the forthcoming practical compatibility discussion.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
6	recommendation_context	South Dakota is rated good on all varieties on which it was used and nearly all other pollinizers are good on South Dakota.	Rated good on all varieties on which it was used in the compatibility discussion on this page.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	South Dakota is rated good on all varieties on which it was used and nearly all other pollinizers are good on South Dakota.	The text says South Dakota and Toka are worth growing for their horticultural value in any plum planting.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
6	recommendation_context	South Dakota and Toka are probably the best general pollinizers in the group and are worth growing for their horticultural value in any plum planting.	Identified as probably one of the best general pollinizers in the group.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	South Dakota and Toka are probably the best general pollinizers in the group and are worth growing for their horticultural value in any plum planting.	The page states Toka is worth growing for horticultural value in any plum planting.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
6	recommendation_context	Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility.	Included among orchard pollinizers despite only fair compatibility from the standpoint of the discussion text.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
6	entry_hardiness_observation	Ember, Redglow, and Superior are included among the pollinizers even though they rate only fair from the standpoint of compatibility.	The text suggests Ember may not be fully winter hardy in northern Minnesota.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
6	recommendation_context	Table 9. Varieties of Plums Suggested for Home or Commercial Planting Showing Interaction of Pollinizers	Listed in Table 9 as a suggested planting variety.	cultivar 142	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	Table 9. Varieties of Plums Suggested for Home or Commercial Planting Showing Interaction of Pollinizers	Season of bloom shown as mid-season.	cultivar 142	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	Redglow Mid-season	Table 9 gives the season of bloom as mid-season.	cultivar 1408	Open Review parse
6	recommendation_context	Redglow Mid-season	Shown in Table 9 as a suggested planting variety and also as a pollinizer column.	cultivar 1408	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	Toka Early	Table 9 gives the season of bloom as early.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	Ember Mid-season	Table 9 gives the season of bloom as mid-season.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
6	taxon_context	Table 10. Self and Cross Fertility in European Plums	Table 10 identifies Dietz as Prunus domestica.	cultivar 1417	Open Review parse
6	description_snippet	Table 10. Self and Cross Fertility in European Plums	Table 10 shows Dietz with a good self-fruit or compatibility rating.	cultivar 1417	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Compass 22 G Late Good P. Besseyi x Miner plum	Parentage is given as P. besseyi x Miner plum.	cultivar 394	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Compass 22 G Late Good P. Besseyi x Miner plum	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 22 varieties.	cultivar 394	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Compass 22 G Late Good P. Besseyi x Miner plum	The narrative states Compass shows good compatibility with 13 out of 22 varieties, fair with two, and poor with seven.	cultivar 394	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Convoy 8 G Medium Good Sand cherry hybrid	Described as a sand cherry hybrid.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Convoy 8 G Medium Good Sand cherry hybrid	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 8 varieties.	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Convoy 8 G Medium Good Sand cherry hybrid	The narrative states Convoy is the only pollinizer which rates good on all varieties on which it has been tested, but the tests had been lim	cultivar 1401	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Dura 6 G Medium Medium Sapa seedling	Listed as a Sapa seedling.	cultivar 1421	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Dura 6 G Medium Medium Sapa seedling	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 6 varieties.	cultivar 1421	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Dura 6 G Medium Medium Sapa seedling	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 1421	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Manor 12 F Early Good Sapa seedling	Listed as a Sapa seedling.	cultivar 1422	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Manor 12 F Early Good Sapa seedling	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 12 varieties.	cultivar 1422	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Manor 12 F Early Good Sapa seedling	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 1422	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Nicollet 14 G Medium Good Sand cherry hybrid	Described as a sand cherry hybrid.	cultivar 1400	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Nicollet 14 G Medium Good Sand cherry hybrid	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 14 varieties.	cultivar 1400	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Nicollet 14 G Medium Good Sand cherry hybrid	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 1400	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Oka 16 F Early Medium Sand cherry hybrid	Described as a sand cherry hybrid.	cultivar 160	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Oka 16 F Early Medium Sand cherry hybrid	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 16 varieties.	cultivar 160	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Oka 16 F Early Medium Sand cherry hybrid	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 160	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Opata 18 F Early Good P. Besseyi x Gold plum	Parentage is given as P. besseyi x Gold plum.	cultivar 159	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Opata 18 F Early Good P. Besseyi x Gold plum	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 18 varieties.	cultivar 159	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Opata 18 F Early Good P. Besseyi x Gold plum	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 159	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Sapa 21 G Early-medium Medium P. Besseyi x Sultan plum	Parentage is given as P. besseyi x Sultan plum.	cultivar 158	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Sapa 21 G Early-medium Medium P. Besseyi x Sultan plum	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 21 varieties.	cultivar 158	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Sapa 21 G Early-medium Medium P. Besseyi x Sultan plum	The narrative states Sapa is good with eight varieties, fair with three, and poor with ten.	cultivar 158	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Sapalta 7 G Medium Good Sapa seedling	Listed as a Sapa seedling.	cultivar 1423	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Sapalta 7 G Medium Good Sapa seedling	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 7 varieties.	cultivar 1423	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Sapalta 7 G Medium Good Sapa seedling	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 1423	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Wachampa 5 F Medium Medium P. Besseyi x Sultan plum	Parentage is given as P. besseyi x Sultan plum.	cultivar 1414	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Wachampa 5 F Medium Medium P. Besseyi x Sultan plum	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 5 varieties.	cultivar 1414	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Wachampa 5 F Medium Medium P. Besseyi x Sultan plum	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 1414	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybrid	Described as a sand cherry hybrid.	cultivar 1424	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybrid	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 14 varieties.	cultivar 1424	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybrid	Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.	cultivar 1424	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Brooks 8 F Very late Medium P. Besseyi	Parentage or taxon note is given as P. besseyi.	cultivar 1425	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Brooks 8 F Very late Medium P. Besseyi	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 8 varieties.	cultivar 1425	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 155 7 G Medium Medium Compass x Formosa plum	Parentage is given as Compass x Formosa plum.	cultivar 1426	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Minn. No. 155 7 G Medium Medium Compass x Formosa plum	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 7 varieties.	cultivar 1426	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 220 5 F Medium Medium (Sand cherry x Climax) x (Sand cherry x Formosa)	Parentage is given as (sand cherry x Climax) x (sand cherry x Formosa).	cultivar 1427	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Minn. No. 220 5 F Medium Medium (Sand cherry x Climax) x (Sand cherry x Formosa)	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 5 varieties.	cultivar 1427	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 376 5 F Medium Medium Zumbra open	Parentage note indicates Zumbra open pollinated.	cultivar 1428	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Minn. No. 376 5 F Medium Medium Zumbra open	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 5 varieties.	cultivar 1428	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Morden No. 117 2 F Medium Medium Sapa seedling	Listed as a Sapa seedling.	cultivar 1429	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Morden No. 117 2 F Medium Medium Sapa seedling	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 2 varieties.	cultivar 1429	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Morden No. 118 17 F Early-medium Medium Sapa seedling	Listed as a Sapa seedling.	cultivar 1430	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Morden No. 118 17 F Early-medium Medium Sapa seedling	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 17 varieties.	cultivar 1430	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	N3782 8 F Medium Medium Sand cherry hybrid	Described as a sand cherry hybrid.	cultivar 1431	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	N3782 8 F Medium Medium Sand cherry hybrid	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 8 varieties.	cultivar 1431	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	N3794 7 F Early Medium Oka seedling	Listed as an Oka seedling.	cultivar 1432	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	N3794 7 F Early Medium Oka seedling	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 7 varieties.	cultivar 1432	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Q-8A-55 Morden 4 F Early Poor Sapa seedling	Listed as a Sapa seedling.	cultivar 1433	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Q-8A-55 Morden 4 F Early Poor Sapa seedling	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 4 varieties.	cultivar 1433	Open Review parse
7	taxon_context	De Soto plum 4 F Early Good P. americana	Taxon note given as P. americana.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	De Soto plum 4 F Early Good P. americana	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 4 cherry-plum varieties.	cultivar 391	Open Review parse
7	taxon_context	Older plum 3 F Too early Good Hybrid plum	Described as a hybrid plum.	cultivar 1404	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Older plum 3 F Too early Good Hybrid plum	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 3 cherry-plum varieties.	cultivar 1404	Open Review parse
7	taxon_context	South Dakota plum 7 G Early Good P. americana	Taxon note given as P. americana.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	South Dakota plum 7 G Early Good P. americana	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 7 cherry-plum varieties.	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	South Dakota plum 7 G Early Good P. americana	Narrative notes that in some seasons South Dakota or Surprise would bloom late enough to overlap the flowering of early-blooming cherry-plum	cultivar 1405	Open Review parse
7	taxon_context	Surprise plum 2 G Very early Good P. hortulana Mineri	Taxon note is printed as P. hortulana Mineri or similar OCR-corrupted form.	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Surprise plum 2 G Very early Good P. hortulana Mineri	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 2 cherry-plum varieties.	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Surprise plum 2 G Very early Good P. hortulana Mineri	Narrative notes that in some seasons South Dakota or Surprise would bloom late enough to overlap the flowering of early-blooming cherry-plum	cultivar 92	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Toka plum 4 G Very early Good P. americana x P. simonii	Parentage is given as P. americana x P. simonii.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Toka plum 4 G Very early Good P. americana x P. simonii	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 4 cherry-plum varieties.	cultivar 157	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 84 plum 1 F Early Good P. americana x Shiro	Parentage is given as P. americana x Shiro.	cultivar 1434	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Minn. No. 84 plum 1 F Early Good P. americana x Shiro	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 1 cherry-plum variety.	cultivar 1434	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 89 plum 5 G Early Good Wastesa x First	Parentage appears to read Wastesa x First in the OCR, but the exact names are uncertain from the scan.	cultivar 1416	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Minn. No. 89 plum 5 G Early Good Wastesa x First	Rated good as a pollinizer in tests on 5 cherry-plum varieties.	cultivar 1416	Open Review parse
7	entry_pedigree	Minn. No. 107 plum 1 F Early Good De Soto x Burbank	Parentage is given as De Soto x Burbank.	cultivar 1435	Open Review parse
7	description_snippet	Minn. No. 107 plum 1 F Early Good De Soto x Burbank	Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 1 cherry-plum variety.	cultivar 1435	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Ember plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 139	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Goff plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1402	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Hanska plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 156	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Superior plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 140	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Tokato plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1436	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Minn. No. 202 cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1437	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Minn. No. 340 cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1438	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Minn. No. 66 Nanking cherry hybrid	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1439	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Minn. No. 120 cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1440	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Minn. No. 123 cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1441	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Minn. No. 44 Nanking cherry hybrid	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1442	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Gordon cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1443	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Red Cortland cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1444	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: St. Anthony cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1445	Open Review parse
7	recommendation_context	Table 12. Varieties Rated as Poor Pollinizers for Cherry-Plums: Tom Thumb cherry-plum	Listed in Table 12 among varieties rated as poor pollinizers for cherry-plums.	cultivar 1446	Open Review parse
7	pollinizer_compatibility	Sapa row: G G G G G F G - P G G	Compass is rated good as a pollinizer for Sapa in Table 13.	cultivar 158	Open Review parse
7	pollinizer_compatibility	Manor row: - G F G G Gt Gt	Oka is rated good as a pollinizer for Manor in Table 14.	cultivar 1422	Open Review parse
7	pollinizer_compatibility	Oka row: - - G G - Gt -	Opata is rated good as a pollinizer for Oka in Table 14.	cultivar 160	Open Review parse
7	pollinizer_compatibility	Opata row: G G - G G G Gt	Manor is rated good as a pollinizer for Opata in Table 14.	cultivar 159	Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

ID	Cultivar	Evidence / Claims	Relationships	History / Pages	Link
158	Sapa	30	15	0	Open cultivar
1401	Convoy	22	11	0	Open cultivar
159	Opata	14	11	0	Open cultivar
1422	Manor	15	10	0	Open cultivar
1423	Sapalta	13	10	0	Open cultivar
160	Oka	10	8	0	Open cultivar
394	Compass	12	5	0	Open cultivar
1405	South Dakota	16	0	0	Open cultivar
157	Toka	14	0	0	Open cultivar
139	Ember	12	0	0	Open cultivar
391	De Soto	12	0	0	Open cultivar
140	Superior	11	0	0	Open cultivar
92	Surprise	10	0	0	Open cultivar
142	Underwood	9	0	0	Open cultivar
1408	Redglow	9	0	0	Open cultivar
1400	Nicollet	7	1	0	Open cultivar
1404	Older	8	0	0	Open cultivar
91	Shiro	7	0	0	Open cultivar
155	Kaga	7	0	0	Open cultivar
1414	Wachampa	6	1	0	Open cultivar
165	Assiniboine	6	0	0	Open cultivar
452	Rollingstone	6	0	0	Open cultivar
458	Wolf	6	0	0	Open cultivar
1416	Minn No 89	6	0	0	Open cultivar
1421	Dura	5	1	0	Open cultivar
1424	Zumbra	5	1	0	Open cultivar
156	Hanska	5	0	0	Open cultivar
290	Redcoat	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1402	Goff	5	0	0	Open cultivar
1409	Hennepin	5	0	0	Open cultivar
163	Wyant	4	0	0	Open cultivar
431	New Ulm	4	0	0	Open cultivar
436	Olson	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1403	Hazel	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1406	Golden Rod	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1407	Loring	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1425	Brooks	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1426	Minn No 155	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1427	Minn No 220	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1428	Minn No 376	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1429	Morden No 117	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1430	Morden No 118	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1431	N3782	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1432	N3794	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1433	Q-Ba-55 Morden	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1434	Minn No 84	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1435	Minn No 107	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1447	Drilea	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1448	Orient (Minn No 63)	4	0	0	Open cultivar
1451	Nzsi	4	0	0	Open cultivar
141	Elliot	3	0	0	Open cultivar
143	Monitor	3	0	0	Open cultivar
161	Terry	3	0	0	Open cultivar
386	Burbank	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1397	La Crescent	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1449	Minn No 64	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1450	Minn No 65	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1454	Minn No 20	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1458	Minn No 60	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1464	Minn No 23	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1466	Minn No 57	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1467	Minn No 88	3	0	0	Open cultivar
1468	Minn No 99	3	0	0	Open cultivar
144	Tonka	2	0	0	Open cultivar
148	Radisson	2	0	0	Open cultivar
149	Fiebing	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1144	Red Wing	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1398	Tom Thumb	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1417	Dietz	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1418	Krikon	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1419	Mount Royal	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1420	Bonne St Anne	2	0	0	Open cultivar
1465	Minn No 46	2	0	0	Open cultivar
89	Tecumseh	1	0	0	Open cultivar
146	Pipestone	1	0	0	Open cultivar
524	Anoka	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1399	Minn No 195	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1410	Mendota	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1411	Pembina	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1412	Redwing	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1413	St Anthony	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1415	Wesota	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1436	Tokato	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1437	Minn No 202 Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1438	Minn No 340 Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1439	Minn No 66 Nanking Cherry Hybrid	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1440	Minn No 120 Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1441	Minn No 123 Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1442	Minn No 44 Nanking Cherry Hybrid	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1443	Gordon Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1444	Red Cortland Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1445	St Anthony Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1446	Tom Thumb Cherry-Plum	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1452	Minn No 59	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1453	Minn No 41	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1455	Minn No 21	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1456	Minn No 22	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1457	Minn No 42	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1459	Minn No 61	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1460	Minn No 62	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1461	N4081	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1462	Minn No 17	1	0	0	Open cultivar
1463	N4082	1	0	0	Open cultivar
parsed only	Minn. No. 5	1	0	8	No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 40

History events: 7

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

Status	License	Holder
unknown

Credibility Records

Tier	Score	Assessor	Rationale
tier_3	60	auto	Commercial domain; treat as secondary evidence

Translation Records

Source Lang	Target Lang	Method	Status	Note
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation ID	Score	Risk	Assessor	Rationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

Status	Visibility	Reviewer	Note
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

Type	Value	Confidence
nursery_candidate	Farm	0.58
nursery_candidate	Weir Fruit Breeding Farm	0.58
institution_candidate	University of Minnesota	0.60
taxon_keyword	prunus	0.65
taxon_keyword	pyrus	0.65

Extracted Claims

Type	Claim	Confidence
description_snippet	11 many species of stone fr uits , par ti cularly in plums, sweet cherries, and the cultivated forms of s an d cherries .	0.54
ornamental_use	pollinator varieti es and t o deter house wher e tempe ratu re and o ther enmine What combinations of v ar ieti es vi ro nmen ta	0.56
nursery_reference	Farm	0.58
nursery_reference	Weir Fruit Breeding Farm	0.58
institution_reference	University of Minnesota	0.60
year_reference	1931	0.55
year_reference	1932	0.55
year_reference	1930	0.55
year_reference	1951	0.55